Cargando…

Sex differences in childhood cancer risk among children with major birth defects: a Nordic population-based nested case-control study

BACKGROUND: Childhood cancer is more common among children with birth defects, suggesting a common aetiology. Whether this association differs by sex is unclear. METHODS: We performed a population-based nested case-control study using nationwide health registries in four Nordic countries. We include...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daltveit, Dagrun Slettebø, Klungsøyr, Kari, Engeland, Anders, Ekbom, Anders, Gissler, Mika, Glimelius, Ingrid, Grotmol, Tom, Madanat-Harjuoja, Laura, Ording, Anne Gulbech, Sørensen, Henrik Toft, Troisi, Rebecca, Bjørge, Tone
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10114053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36179253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyac192
_version_ 1785027950035337216
author Daltveit, Dagrun Slettebø
Klungsøyr, Kari
Engeland, Anders
Ekbom, Anders
Gissler, Mika
Glimelius, Ingrid
Grotmol, Tom
Madanat-Harjuoja, Laura
Ording, Anne Gulbech
Sørensen, Henrik Toft
Troisi, Rebecca
Bjørge, Tone
author_facet Daltveit, Dagrun Slettebø
Klungsøyr, Kari
Engeland, Anders
Ekbom, Anders
Gissler, Mika
Glimelius, Ingrid
Grotmol, Tom
Madanat-Harjuoja, Laura
Ording, Anne Gulbech
Sørensen, Henrik Toft
Troisi, Rebecca
Bjørge, Tone
author_sort Daltveit, Dagrun Slettebø
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Childhood cancer is more common among children with birth defects, suggesting a common aetiology. Whether this association differs by sex is unclear. METHODS: We performed a population-based nested case-control study using nationwide health registries in four Nordic countries. We included 21 898 cancer cases (0–19 years) and 218 980 matched population controls, born 1967–2014. Associations between childhood cancer and major birth defects were calculated as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using logistic regression models. Effect modification was evaluated using a counterfactual framework to estimate confidence intervals and P-values for the natural indirect effects. RESULTS: Birth defects were present for 5.1% (1117/21 898) of childhood cancer cases and 2.2% (4873/218 980) of controls; OR of cancer was higher for chromosomal (OR = 10, 95% CI = 8.6–12) than for non-chromosomal defects (OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.8–2.1), strongest between genetic syndromes/microdeletion and renal tumours, Down syndrome and leukaemia, and nervous system defects and central nervous system tumours. The association between birth defects and cancer was stronger among females (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 2.6–3.1) than males (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.9–2.2, P(interaction) <0.001). Male sex was an independent risk factor for childhood cancer, but very little of the overall association between sex and childhood cancer was mediated through birth defects (4.8%, P(NIE) <0.001), although more at younger ages (10% below years and 28% below 1 year). CONCLUSIONS: The birth defect–cancer associations were generally stronger among females than males. Birth defects did not act as a strong mediator for the modest differences in childhood cancer risk by sex, suggesting that other biological pathways are involved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10114053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101140532023-04-20 Sex differences in childhood cancer risk among children with major birth defects: a Nordic population-based nested case-control study Daltveit, Dagrun Slettebø Klungsøyr, Kari Engeland, Anders Ekbom, Anders Gissler, Mika Glimelius, Ingrid Grotmol, Tom Madanat-Harjuoja, Laura Ording, Anne Gulbech Sørensen, Henrik Toft Troisi, Rebecca Bjørge, Tone Int J Epidemiol Infant and Child Health BACKGROUND: Childhood cancer is more common among children with birth defects, suggesting a common aetiology. Whether this association differs by sex is unclear. METHODS: We performed a population-based nested case-control study using nationwide health registries in four Nordic countries. We included 21 898 cancer cases (0–19 years) and 218 980 matched population controls, born 1967–2014. Associations between childhood cancer and major birth defects were calculated as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using logistic regression models. Effect modification was evaluated using a counterfactual framework to estimate confidence intervals and P-values for the natural indirect effects. RESULTS: Birth defects were present for 5.1% (1117/21 898) of childhood cancer cases and 2.2% (4873/218 980) of controls; OR of cancer was higher for chromosomal (OR = 10, 95% CI = 8.6–12) than for non-chromosomal defects (OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.8–2.1), strongest between genetic syndromes/microdeletion and renal tumours, Down syndrome and leukaemia, and nervous system defects and central nervous system tumours. The association between birth defects and cancer was stronger among females (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 2.6–3.1) than males (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.9–2.2, P(interaction) <0.001). Male sex was an independent risk factor for childhood cancer, but very little of the overall association between sex and childhood cancer was mediated through birth defects (4.8%, P(NIE) <0.001), although more at younger ages (10% below years and 28% below 1 year). CONCLUSIONS: The birth defect–cancer associations were generally stronger among females than males. Birth defects did not act as a strong mediator for the modest differences in childhood cancer risk by sex, suggesting that other biological pathways are involved. Oxford University Press 2022-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10114053/ /pubmed/36179253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyac192 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Infant and Child Health
Daltveit, Dagrun Slettebø
Klungsøyr, Kari
Engeland, Anders
Ekbom, Anders
Gissler, Mika
Glimelius, Ingrid
Grotmol, Tom
Madanat-Harjuoja, Laura
Ording, Anne Gulbech
Sørensen, Henrik Toft
Troisi, Rebecca
Bjørge, Tone
Sex differences in childhood cancer risk among children with major birth defects: a Nordic population-based nested case-control study
title Sex differences in childhood cancer risk among children with major birth defects: a Nordic population-based nested case-control study
title_full Sex differences in childhood cancer risk among children with major birth defects: a Nordic population-based nested case-control study
title_fullStr Sex differences in childhood cancer risk among children with major birth defects: a Nordic population-based nested case-control study
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in childhood cancer risk among children with major birth defects: a Nordic population-based nested case-control study
title_short Sex differences in childhood cancer risk among children with major birth defects: a Nordic population-based nested case-control study
title_sort sex differences in childhood cancer risk among children with major birth defects: a nordic population-based nested case-control study
topic Infant and Child Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10114053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36179253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyac192
work_keys_str_mv AT daltveitdagrunslettebø sexdifferencesinchildhoodcancerriskamongchildrenwithmajorbirthdefectsanordicpopulationbasednestedcasecontrolstudy
AT klungsøyrkari sexdifferencesinchildhoodcancerriskamongchildrenwithmajorbirthdefectsanordicpopulationbasednestedcasecontrolstudy
AT engelandanders sexdifferencesinchildhoodcancerriskamongchildrenwithmajorbirthdefectsanordicpopulationbasednestedcasecontrolstudy
AT ekbomanders sexdifferencesinchildhoodcancerriskamongchildrenwithmajorbirthdefectsanordicpopulationbasednestedcasecontrolstudy
AT gisslermika sexdifferencesinchildhoodcancerriskamongchildrenwithmajorbirthdefectsanordicpopulationbasednestedcasecontrolstudy
AT glimeliusingrid sexdifferencesinchildhoodcancerriskamongchildrenwithmajorbirthdefectsanordicpopulationbasednestedcasecontrolstudy
AT grotmoltom sexdifferencesinchildhoodcancerriskamongchildrenwithmajorbirthdefectsanordicpopulationbasednestedcasecontrolstudy
AT madanatharjuojalaura sexdifferencesinchildhoodcancerriskamongchildrenwithmajorbirthdefectsanordicpopulationbasednestedcasecontrolstudy
AT ordingannegulbech sexdifferencesinchildhoodcancerriskamongchildrenwithmajorbirthdefectsanordicpopulationbasednestedcasecontrolstudy
AT sørensenhenriktoft sexdifferencesinchildhoodcancerriskamongchildrenwithmajorbirthdefectsanordicpopulationbasednestedcasecontrolstudy
AT troisirebecca sexdifferencesinchildhoodcancerriskamongchildrenwithmajorbirthdefectsanordicpopulationbasednestedcasecontrolstudy
AT bjørgetone sexdifferencesinchildhoodcancerriskamongchildrenwithmajorbirthdefectsanordicpopulationbasednestedcasecontrolstudy