Tools for the investigation of adverse events: scoping review (*)

OBJECTIVE: To map, in the literature, the risk management tools aimed at investigating health adverse events. METHOD: Scoping review according to the Joanna Brigss Institute, with acronym PCC (Population: hospitalized patients, Concept: tools for the investigation of adverse events, and Context: hea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Mello, Lucas Rodrigo Garcia, Christovam, Barbara Pompeu, Moreira, Ana Paula Amorim, de Moraes, Erica Brandão, Paes, Graciele Oroski, Prates, Cassiana Gil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem 2022
Materias:
Review
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10114091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35724262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2021-0519en
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To map, in the literature, the risk management tools aimed at investigating health adverse events. METHOD: Scoping review according to the Joanna Brigss Institute, with acronym PCC (Population: hospitalized patients, Concept: tools for the investigation of adverse events, and Context: health institutions) carried out in MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, LILACS, Scopus, CINAHL, and gray literature. RESULTS: The search totaled 825 scientific productions, 31 of which met the objective of the study, which consisted of 27 scientific articles and 4 expert consensus. It was possible to carry out a synthesis of the necessary steps for the investigation of adverse events and use of the tools according to the extent of damage. CONCLUSION: The practice of investigating adverse events should be guided by a thorough understanding of contributing factors, a fair culture, and the involvement of senior leadership.

Ejemplares similares