Cargando…

Effects of poverty on mental health in the UK working-age population: causal analyses of the UK Household Longitudinal Study

BACKGROUND: Addressing poverty through taxation or welfare policies is likely important for public mental health; however, few studies assess poverty’s effects using causal epidemiology. We estimated the effect of poverty on mental health. METHODS: We used data on working-age adults (25–64 years) fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomson, Rachel M, Kopasker, Daniel, Leyland, Alastair, Pearce, Anna, Katikireddi, S Vittal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10114108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36479855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyac226
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Addressing poverty through taxation or welfare policies is likely important for public mental health; however, few studies assess poverty’s effects using causal epidemiology. We estimated the effect of poverty on mental health. METHODS: We used data on working-age adults (25–64 years) from nine waves of the UK Household Longitudinal Survey (2009–19; n = 45 497/observations = 202 207 following multiple imputation). We defined poverty as a household equivalized income <60% median, and the outcome likely common mental disorder (CMD) as a General Health Questionnaire-12 score ≥4. We used double-robust marginal structural modelling with inverse probability of treatment weights to generate absolute and relative effects. Supplementary analyses separated transitions into/out of poverty, and stratified by gender, education, and age. We quantified potential impact through population attributable fractions (PAFs) with bootstrapped standard errors. RESULTS: Good balance of confounders was achieved between exposure groups, with 45 830 observations (22.65%) reporting poverty. The absolute effect of poverty on CMD prevalence was 2.15% [%-point change; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45, 2.84]; prevalence in those unexposed was 20.59% (95% CI 20.29%, 20.88%), and the odds ratio was 1.17 (95% CI 1.12, 1.24). There was a larger absolute effect for transitions into poverty [2.46% (95% CI 1.56, 3.36)] than transitions out of poverty [–1.49% (95% CI –2.46, –0.53)]. Effects were also slightly larger in women than men [2.34% (95% CI 1.41, 3.26) versus 1.73% (95% CI 0.72, 2.74)]. The PAF for moving into poverty was 6.34% (95% CI 4.23, 8.45). CONCLUSIONS: PAFs derived from our causal estimates suggest moves into poverty account for just over 6% of the burden of CMD in the UK working-age population, with larger effects in women.