Cargando…

Evaluating remote skin cancer multidisciplinary team meetings in the United Kingdom post-COVID-19

INTRODUCTION: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, there was concern that virtual or remote multidisciplinary teams (MDT) meetings represented a niche concept that was unlikely to replace traditional face-to-face meetings in the management of cancer. However, the sudden shift to virtual meetings during C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ali, Stephen R., Dobbs, Thomas D., Mohamedbhai, Hussein, Whitaker, Sairan, Hutchings, Hayley A., Whitaker, Iain S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10114315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37352621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2023.04.052
_version_ 1785027990001811456
author Ali, Stephen R.
Dobbs, Thomas D.
Mohamedbhai, Hussein
Whitaker, Sairan
Hutchings, Hayley A.
Whitaker, Iain S.
author_facet Ali, Stephen R.
Dobbs, Thomas D.
Mohamedbhai, Hussein
Whitaker, Sairan
Hutchings, Hayley A.
Whitaker, Iain S.
author_sort Ali, Stephen R.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, there was concern that virtual or remote multidisciplinary teams (MDT) meetings represented a niche concept that was unlikely to replace traditional face-to-face meetings in the management of cancer. However, the sudden shift to virtual meetings during COVID-19 has been one of the most dramatic changes since the inception of the MDT. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of virtual skin MDTs since the move to virtual meetings. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was sent to all Specialist Skin Cancer MDTs (SSMDTs) and the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgeons Skin Oncology Special Interest and Advisory Group. RESULTS: There were 68 responses (55.3% response rate) from 36 SSMDTs in the UK. Respondents felt communication, chairing, and decision-making were similar in virtual and in-person MDTs, but the team working was worse in virtual meetings. Recruitment, data security, and patient confidentiality were maintained in virtual MDTs. Most preferred a hybrid format for future MDTs, with the option to attend virtually. Recommendations for improvement included better connectivity, IT support, training, and staff integration. CONCLUSION: The virtual MDT is here to stay. We highlight the strengths and weaknesses of remote virtual skin MDTs. It is key that we look at ways to retain team working to ensure that the collegiate nature of MDT working, and therefore treatment options for patients, are not lost in this transformation in MDT delivery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10114315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101143152023-04-19 Evaluating remote skin cancer multidisciplinary team meetings in the United Kingdom post-COVID-19 Ali, Stephen R. Dobbs, Thomas D. Mohamedbhai, Hussein Whitaker, Sairan Hutchings, Hayley A. Whitaker, Iain S. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Article INTRODUCTION: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, there was concern that virtual or remote multidisciplinary teams (MDT) meetings represented a niche concept that was unlikely to replace traditional face-to-face meetings in the management of cancer. However, the sudden shift to virtual meetings during COVID-19 has been one of the most dramatic changes since the inception of the MDT. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of virtual skin MDTs since the move to virtual meetings. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was sent to all Specialist Skin Cancer MDTs (SSMDTs) and the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgeons Skin Oncology Special Interest and Advisory Group. RESULTS: There were 68 responses (55.3% response rate) from 36 SSMDTs in the UK. Respondents felt communication, chairing, and decision-making were similar in virtual and in-person MDTs, but the team working was worse in virtual meetings. Recruitment, data security, and patient confidentiality were maintained in virtual MDTs. Most preferred a hybrid format for future MDTs, with the option to attend virtually. Recommendations for improvement included better connectivity, IT support, training, and staff integration. CONCLUSION: The virtual MDT is here to stay. We highlight the strengths and weaknesses of remote virtual skin MDTs. It is key that we look at ways to retain team working to ensure that the collegiate nature of MDT working, and therefore treatment options for patients, are not lost in this transformation in MDT delivery. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. 2023-09 2023-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10114315/ /pubmed/37352621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2023.04.052 Text en © 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Ali, Stephen R.
Dobbs, Thomas D.
Mohamedbhai, Hussein
Whitaker, Sairan
Hutchings, Hayley A.
Whitaker, Iain S.
Evaluating remote skin cancer multidisciplinary team meetings in the United Kingdom post-COVID-19
title Evaluating remote skin cancer multidisciplinary team meetings in the United Kingdom post-COVID-19
title_full Evaluating remote skin cancer multidisciplinary team meetings in the United Kingdom post-COVID-19
title_fullStr Evaluating remote skin cancer multidisciplinary team meetings in the United Kingdom post-COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating remote skin cancer multidisciplinary team meetings in the United Kingdom post-COVID-19
title_short Evaluating remote skin cancer multidisciplinary team meetings in the United Kingdom post-COVID-19
title_sort evaluating remote skin cancer multidisciplinary team meetings in the united kingdom post-covid-19
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10114315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37352621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2023.04.052
work_keys_str_mv AT alistephenr evaluatingremoteskincancermultidisciplinaryteammeetingsintheunitedkingdompostcovid19
AT dobbsthomasd evaluatingremoteskincancermultidisciplinaryteammeetingsintheunitedkingdompostcovid19
AT mohamedbhaihussein evaluatingremoteskincancermultidisciplinaryteammeetingsintheunitedkingdompostcovid19
AT whitakersairan evaluatingremoteskincancermultidisciplinaryteammeetingsintheunitedkingdompostcovid19
AT hutchingshayleya evaluatingremoteskincancermultidisciplinaryteammeetingsintheunitedkingdompostcovid19
AT whitakeriains evaluatingremoteskincancermultidisciplinaryteammeetingsintheunitedkingdompostcovid19