Cargando…

Tumor Area Positivity (TAP) score of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1): a novel visual estimation method for combined tumor cell and immune cell scoring

BACKGROUND: Determination of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein expression level in tumor cells and tumor-associated immune cells is critical for identifying patients eligible for immunotherapy. PD-L1 manual scoring algorithms can generally be divided into two categories: cell counting and vi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Chunyan, Fang, Fang, Kong, Ying, ElGabry, Ehab A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10114344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37076889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-023-01318-8
_version_ 1785027996123398144
author Liu, Chunyan
Fang, Fang
Kong, Ying
ElGabry, Ehab A.
author_facet Liu, Chunyan
Fang, Fang
Kong, Ying
ElGabry, Ehab A.
author_sort Liu, Chunyan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Determination of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein expression level in tumor cells and tumor-associated immune cells is critical for identifying patients eligible for immunotherapy. PD-L1 manual scoring algorithms can generally be divided into two categories: cell counting and visual estimation. Cell counting can be time-consuming and is not in sync with pathology practice, which classically uses a Gestalt approach based on pattern recognition and visual estimation. In this study, we introduce the Tumor Area Positivity (TAP) score, which is a novel, straightforward method for scoring tumor cells and immune cells together using visual estimation. METHODS: To demonstrate the reproducibility of TAP scoring among pathologists, between- and within-reader precision studies were performed both within (internal) and outside of (external) our organization. We also compared the TAP score to the Combined Positive Score (CPS), which is based on cell counting, for concordance and time efficacy. RESULTS: The average positive agreement, average negative agreement, and overall percent agreement between and within readers were all above 85% for both internal and combined external reader precision studies. TAP score had high concordance rate at 5% cutoff compared with CPS at cutoff 1: positive percent agreement, negative percent agreement, and overall percent agreement were all above 85%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed the TAP scoring method to be straightforward, significantly less time-consuming, and highly reproducible with a high concordance rate between TAP score and CPS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13000-023-01318-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10114344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101143442023-04-20 Tumor Area Positivity (TAP) score of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1): a novel visual estimation method for combined tumor cell and immune cell scoring Liu, Chunyan Fang, Fang Kong, Ying ElGabry, Ehab A. Diagn Pathol Research BACKGROUND: Determination of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein expression level in tumor cells and tumor-associated immune cells is critical for identifying patients eligible for immunotherapy. PD-L1 manual scoring algorithms can generally be divided into two categories: cell counting and visual estimation. Cell counting can be time-consuming and is not in sync with pathology practice, which classically uses a Gestalt approach based on pattern recognition and visual estimation. In this study, we introduce the Tumor Area Positivity (TAP) score, which is a novel, straightforward method for scoring tumor cells and immune cells together using visual estimation. METHODS: To demonstrate the reproducibility of TAP scoring among pathologists, between- and within-reader precision studies were performed both within (internal) and outside of (external) our organization. We also compared the TAP score to the Combined Positive Score (CPS), which is based on cell counting, for concordance and time efficacy. RESULTS: The average positive agreement, average negative agreement, and overall percent agreement between and within readers were all above 85% for both internal and combined external reader precision studies. TAP score had high concordance rate at 5% cutoff compared with CPS at cutoff 1: positive percent agreement, negative percent agreement, and overall percent agreement were all above 85%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed the TAP scoring method to be straightforward, significantly less time-consuming, and highly reproducible with a high concordance rate between TAP score and CPS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13000-023-01318-8. BioMed Central 2023-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10114344/ /pubmed/37076889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-023-01318-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Liu, Chunyan
Fang, Fang
Kong, Ying
ElGabry, Ehab A.
Tumor Area Positivity (TAP) score of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1): a novel visual estimation method for combined tumor cell and immune cell scoring
title Tumor Area Positivity (TAP) score of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1): a novel visual estimation method for combined tumor cell and immune cell scoring
title_full Tumor Area Positivity (TAP) score of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1): a novel visual estimation method for combined tumor cell and immune cell scoring
title_fullStr Tumor Area Positivity (TAP) score of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1): a novel visual estimation method for combined tumor cell and immune cell scoring
title_full_unstemmed Tumor Area Positivity (TAP) score of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1): a novel visual estimation method for combined tumor cell and immune cell scoring
title_short Tumor Area Positivity (TAP) score of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1): a novel visual estimation method for combined tumor cell and immune cell scoring
title_sort tumor area positivity (tap) score of programmed death-ligand 1 (pd-l1): a novel visual estimation method for combined tumor cell and immune cell scoring
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10114344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37076889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-023-01318-8
work_keys_str_mv AT liuchunyan tumorareapositivitytapscoreofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1anovelvisualestimationmethodforcombinedtumorcellandimmunecellscoring
AT fangfang tumorareapositivitytapscoreofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1anovelvisualestimationmethodforcombinedtumorcellandimmunecellscoring
AT kongying tumorareapositivitytapscoreofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1anovelvisualestimationmethodforcombinedtumorcellandimmunecellscoring
AT elgabryehaba tumorareapositivitytapscoreofprogrammeddeathligand1pdl1anovelvisualestimationmethodforcombinedtumorcellandimmunecellscoring