Cargando…
Clinical and patient-reported outcome after patient-specific 3D printer-assisted cranioplasty
Various cranioplasty techniques exist for the reconstruction of cranial bone defects. Patient-specific implants can be produced in-house using a recently developed 3D printer-assisted cranioplasty technique. However, the resulting cosmetic outcomes from the patient’s perspective are underreported. W...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10115682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37074490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-02000-9 |
_version_ | 1785028262026543104 |
---|---|
author | Ebel, Florian Schön, Stephan Sharma, Neha Guzman, Raphael Mariani, Luigi Thieringer, Florian M. Soleman, Jehuda |
author_facet | Ebel, Florian Schön, Stephan Sharma, Neha Guzman, Raphael Mariani, Luigi Thieringer, Florian M. Soleman, Jehuda |
author_sort | Ebel, Florian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Various cranioplasty techniques exist for the reconstruction of cranial bone defects. Patient-specific implants can be produced in-house using a recently developed 3D printer-assisted cranioplasty technique. However, the resulting cosmetic outcomes from the patient’s perspective are underreported. With our case series, we aim to present the clinical outcome, morbidity rate, patient-reported cosmetic results, and cost-effectiveness of patient-specific3D printer-assisted cranioplasty technique. This is a consecutive retrospective case series of adult patients undergoing cranioplasty using the patient-specific 3D printer-assisted technique. As primary endpoint, the functional outcome based on modified Rankin scale (mRS) at discharge and follow-up was assessed. A prospective telephone survey was conducted to collect and provide patient-reported outcomes. Thirty-one patients underwent patient-specific 3D printer-assisted cranioplasty, mostly to reconstruct frontotemporoparietal (61.3%) and frontotemporal defects with orbital involvement (19.4%). Good functional outcome (mRS ≤ 2) at discharge and during the last follow-up was achieved in 54.8% (n = 17) and 58.1% (n = 18) patients. Overall, the rate of clinically relevant surgery-related complications was 35.5% (n = 11). Postoperative epidural hematoma/collection (16.1%) and infections (12.9%) were the most frequent complications. Permanent morbidity occurred in one patient (3.2%) with postoperative acute ipsilateral vision loss after frontotemporal cranioplasty with orbital involvement. No surgery-related mortality occurred. The mean patient-reported cosmetic satisfaction score was 7.8 ± 1.5, with 80% of patients reporting satisfying or very satisfying cosmetic results. No significant differences were seen between the different defect localization regarding the cosmetic outcome. The mean manufacturing costs of a patient-specific 3D printer-assisted implant ranged from 748 to 1129 USD. Based on our case series, patient-specific 3D printer-assisted cranioplasty is cost-effective and leads to satisfying cosmetic results, especially in large defects and/or defects with complex geometry. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10143-023-02000-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10115682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101156822023-04-21 Clinical and patient-reported outcome after patient-specific 3D printer-assisted cranioplasty Ebel, Florian Schön, Stephan Sharma, Neha Guzman, Raphael Mariani, Luigi Thieringer, Florian M. Soleman, Jehuda Neurosurg Rev Research Various cranioplasty techniques exist for the reconstruction of cranial bone defects. Patient-specific implants can be produced in-house using a recently developed 3D printer-assisted cranioplasty technique. However, the resulting cosmetic outcomes from the patient’s perspective are underreported. With our case series, we aim to present the clinical outcome, morbidity rate, patient-reported cosmetic results, and cost-effectiveness of patient-specific3D printer-assisted cranioplasty technique. This is a consecutive retrospective case series of adult patients undergoing cranioplasty using the patient-specific 3D printer-assisted technique. As primary endpoint, the functional outcome based on modified Rankin scale (mRS) at discharge and follow-up was assessed. A prospective telephone survey was conducted to collect and provide patient-reported outcomes. Thirty-one patients underwent patient-specific 3D printer-assisted cranioplasty, mostly to reconstruct frontotemporoparietal (61.3%) and frontotemporal defects with orbital involvement (19.4%). Good functional outcome (mRS ≤ 2) at discharge and during the last follow-up was achieved in 54.8% (n = 17) and 58.1% (n = 18) patients. Overall, the rate of clinically relevant surgery-related complications was 35.5% (n = 11). Postoperative epidural hematoma/collection (16.1%) and infections (12.9%) were the most frequent complications. Permanent morbidity occurred in one patient (3.2%) with postoperative acute ipsilateral vision loss after frontotemporal cranioplasty with orbital involvement. No surgery-related mortality occurred. The mean patient-reported cosmetic satisfaction score was 7.8 ± 1.5, with 80% of patients reporting satisfying or very satisfying cosmetic results. No significant differences were seen between the different defect localization regarding the cosmetic outcome. The mean manufacturing costs of a patient-specific 3D printer-assisted implant ranged from 748 to 1129 USD. Based on our case series, patient-specific 3D printer-assisted cranioplasty is cost-effective and leads to satisfying cosmetic results, especially in large defects and/or defects with complex geometry. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10143-023-02000-9. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-04-19 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10115682/ /pubmed/37074490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-02000-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Ebel, Florian Schön, Stephan Sharma, Neha Guzman, Raphael Mariani, Luigi Thieringer, Florian M. Soleman, Jehuda Clinical and patient-reported outcome after patient-specific 3D printer-assisted cranioplasty |
title | Clinical and patient-reported outcome after patient-specific 3D printer-assisted cranioplasty |
title_full | Clinical and patient-reported outcome after patient-specific 3D printer-assisted cranioplasty |
title_fullStr | Clinical and patient-reported outcome after patient-specific 3D printer-assisted cranioplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical and patient-reported outcome after patient-specific 3D printer-assisted cranioplasty |
title_short | Clinical and patient-reported outcome after patient-specific 3D printer-assisted cranioplasty |
title_sort | clinical and patient-reported outcome after patient-specific 3d printer-assisted cranioplasty |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10115682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37074490 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-02000-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ebelflorian clinicalandpatientreportedoutcomeafterpatientspecific3dprinterassistedcranioplasty AT schonstephan clinicalandpatientreportedoutcomeafterpatientspecific3dprinterassistedcranioplasty AT sharmaneha clinicalandpatientreportedoutcomeafterpatientspecific3dprinterassistedcranioplasty AT guzmanraphael clinicalandpatientreportedoutcomeafterpatientspecific3dprinterassistedcranioplasty AT marianiluigi clinicalandpatientreportedoutcomeafterpatientspecific3dprinterassistedcranioplasty AT thieringerflorianm clinicalandpatientreportedoutcomeafterpatientspecific3dprinterassistedcranioplasty AT solemanjehuda clinicalandpatientreportedoutcomeafterpatientspecific3dprinterassistedcranioplasty |