Cargando…

A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation of a Food Hygiene Intervention in Low-Income Informal Neighbourhoods of Kisumu, Kenya

OBJECTIVES: Diarrhoea is a leading cause of infant mortality with the main transmission pathways being unsafe water and contaminated food, surfaces and hands. The ‘Safe Start’ trial evaluated a food hygiene intervention implemented in a peri-urban settlement of Kisumu, Kenya, with the aim of reducin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simiyu, Sheillah, Aseyo, Evalyne, Anderson, John, Cumming, Oliver, Baker, Kelly K., Dreibelbis, Robert, Mumma, Jane Awiti Odhiambo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10115704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-022-03548-6
_version_ 1785028266352967680
author Simiyu, Sheillah
Aseyo, Evalyne
Anderson, John
Cumming, Oliver
Baker, Kelly K.
Dreibelbis, Robert
Mumma, Jane Awiti Odhiambo
author_facet Simiyu, Sheillah
Aseyo, Evalyne
Anderson, John
Cumming, Oliver
Baker, Kelly K.
Dreibelbis, Robert
Mumma, Jane Awiti Odhiambo
author_sort Simiyu, Sheillah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Diarrhoea is a leading cause of infant mortality with the main transmission pathways being unsafe water and contaminated food, surfaces and hands. The ‘Safe Start’ trial evaluated a food hygiene intervention implemented in a peri-urban settlement of Kisumu, Kenya, with the aim of reducing diarrhoeagenic enteric infections among infants. Four food hygiene behaviours were targeted: handwashing with soap before preparation and feeding, boiling infant food before feeding, storing infant food in sealed containers, and exclusive use of designated utensils during feeding. METHODS: A process evaluation of the intervention was guided by a theory of change describing the hypothesised implementation and receipt of the intervention, mechanisms of change, and the context. These were assessed by qualitative and quantitative data that included debriefing sessions with the delivery teams and Community Health Volunteers (CHVs), and structured observations during food preparation. RESULTS: The intervention achieved high coverage and fidelity with over 90% of 814 eligible caregivers participating in the intervention. Caregivers in the intervention arm demonstrated an understanding of the intervention messages, and had 1.38 (95% CI: 1.02–1.87) times the odds of washing hands before food preparation and 3.5 (95% CI: 1.91–6.56) times the odds of using a feeding utensil compared to caregivers in the control group. Contextual factors, especially the movement of caregivers within and outside the study area and time constraints faced by caregivers influenced uptake of some intervention behaviours. CONCLUSION: Future interventions should seek to explicitly target contextual factors such as secondary caregivers and promote food hygiene interventions as independent of each other.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10115704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101157042023-04-21 A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation of a Food Hygiene Intervention in Low-Income Informal Neighbourhoods of Kisumu, Kenya Simiyu, Sheillah Aseyo, Evalyne Anderson, John Cumming, Oliver Baker, Kelly K. Dreibelbis, Robert Mumma, Jane Awiti Odhiambo Matern Child Health J Article OBJECTIVES: Diarrhoea is a leading cause of infant mortality with the main transmission pathways being unsafe water and contaminated food, surfaces and hands. The ‘Safe Start’ trial evaluated a food hygiene intervention implemented in a peri-urban settlement of Kisumu, Kenya, with the aim of reducing diarrhoeagenic enteric infections among infants. Four food hygiene behaviours were targeted: handwashing with soap before preparation and feeding, boiling infant food before feeding, storing infant food in sealed containers, and exclusive use of designated utensils during feeding. METHODS: A process evaluation of the intervention was guided by a theory of change describing the hypothesised implementation and receipt of the intervention, mechanisms of change, and the context. These were assessed by qualitative and quantitative data that included debriefing sessions with the delivery teams and Community Health Volunteers (CHVs), and structured observations during food preparation. RESULTS: The intervention achieved high coverage and fidelity with over 90% of 814 eligible caregivers participating in the intervention. Caregivers in the intervention arm demonstrated an understanding of the intervention messages, and had 1.38 (95% CI: 1.02–1.87) times the odds of washing hands before food preparation and 3.5 (95% CI: 1.91–6.56) times the odds of using a feeding utensil compared to caregivers in the control group. Contextual factors, especially the movement of caregivers within and outside the study area and time constraints faced by caregivers influenced uptake of some intervention behaviours. CONCLUSION: Future interventions should seek to explicitly target contextual factors such as secondary caregivers and promote food hygiene interventions as independent of each other. Springer US 2022-11-09 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10115704/ /pubmed/36352283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-022-03548-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Simiyu, Sheillah
Aseyo, Evalyne
Anderson, John
Cumming, Oliver
Baker, Kelly K.
Dreibelbis, Robert
Mumma, Jane Awiti Odhiambo
A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation of a Food Hygiene Intervention in Low-Income Informal Neighbourhoods of Kisumu, Kenya
title A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation of a Food Hygiene Intervention in Low-Income Informal Neighbourhoods of Kisumu, Kenya
title_full A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation of a Food Hygiene Intervention in Low-Income Informal Neighbourhoods of Kisumu, Kenya
title_fullStr A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation of a Food Hygiene Intervention in Low-Income Informal Neighbourhoods of Kisumu, Kenya
title_full_unstemmed A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation of a Food Hygiene Intervention in Low-Income Informal Neighbourhoods of Kisumu, Kenya
title_short A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation of a Food Hygiene Intervention in Low-Income Informal Neighbourhoods of Kisumu, Kenya
title_sort mixed methods process evaluation of a food hygiene intervention in low-income informal neighbourhoods of kisumu, kenya
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10115704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36352283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-022-03548-6
work_keys_str_mv AT simiyusheillah amixedmethodsprocessevaluationofafoodhygieneinterventioninlowincomeinformalneighbourhoodsofkisumukenya
AT aseyoevalyne amixedmethodsprocessevaluationofafoodhygieneinterventioninlowincomeinformalneighbourhoodsofkisumukenya
AT andersonjohn amixedmethodsprocessevaluationofafoodhygieneinterventioninlowincomeinformalneighbourhoodsofkisumukenya
AT cummingoliver amixedmethodsprocessevaluationofafoodhygieneinterventioninlowincomeinformalneighbourhoodsofkisumukenya
AT bakerkellyk amixedmethodsprocessevaluationofafoodhygieneinterventioninlowincomeinformalneighbourhoodsofkisumukenya
AT dreibelbisrobert amixedmethodsprocessevaluationofafoodhygieneinterventioninlowincomeinformalneighbourhoodsofkisumukenya
AT mummajaneawitiodhiambo amixedmethodsprocessevaluationofafoodhygieneinterventioninlowincomeinformalneighbourhoodsofkisumukenya
AT simiyusheillah mixedmethodsprocessevaluationofafoodhygieneinterventioninlowincomeinformalneighbourhoodsofkisumukenya
AT aseyoevalyne mixedmethodsprocessevaluationofafoodhygieneinterventioninlowincomeinformalneighbourhoodsofkisumukenya
AT andersonjohn mixedmethodsprocessevaluationofafoodhygieneinterventioninlowincomeinformalneighbourhoodsofkisumukenya
AT cummingoliver mixedmethodsprocessevaluationofafoodhygieneinterventioninlowincomeinformalneighbourhoodsofkisumukenya
AT bakerkellyk mixedmethodsprocessevaluationofafoodhygieneinterventioninlowincomeinformalneighbourhoodsofkisumukenya
AT dreibelbisrobert mixedmethodsprocessevaluationofafoodhygieneinterventioninlowincomeinformalneighbourhoodsofkisumukenya
AT mummajaneawitiodhiambo mixedmethodsprocessevaluationofafoodhygieneinterventioninlowincomeinformalneighbourhoodsofkisumukenya