Cargando…

Improving detection performance of hepatocellular carcinoma and interobserver agreement for liver imaging reporting and data system on CT using deep learning reconstruction

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection performance, interobserver agreement for Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) categories, and image quality between deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and conventional hybrid iterative reconstruction (Hybr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okimoto, Naomasa, Yasaka, Koichiro, Kaiume, Masafumi, Kanemaru, Noriko, Suzuki, Yuichi, Abe, Osamu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10115733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36757454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03834-z
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection performance, interobserver agreement for Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) categories, and image quality between deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and conventional hybrid iterative reconstruction (Hybrid IR) in CT. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced CT between October 2021 and March 2022. Arterial, portal, and delayed phase images were reconstructed using DLR and Hybrid IR. Two blinded readers independently read the image sets with detecting HCCs, scoring LI-RADS, and evaluating image quality. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients with HCC (mean age, 73 years ± 12.3) and 23 patients without HCC (mean age, 66 years ± 14.7) were included. The figures of merit (FOM) for the jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis in detecting HCC averaged for the readers were 0.925 (reader 1, 0.937; reader 2, 0.913) in DLR and 0.878 (reader 1, 0.904; reader 2, 0.851) in Hybrid IR, and the FOM in DLR were significantly higher than that in Hybrid IR (p = 0.038). The interobserver agreement (Cohen’s weighted kappa statistics) for LI-RADS categories was moderate for DLR (0.595; 95% CI, 0.585–0.605) and significantly superior to Hybrid IR (0.568; 95% CI, 0.553–0.582). According to both readers, DLR was significantly superior to Hybrid IR in terms of image quality (p ≤ 0.021). CONCLUSION: DLR improved HCC detection, interobserver agreement for LI-RADS categories, and image quality in evaluations of HCC compared to Hybrid IR in abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced CT. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]