Cargando…
Improving detection performance of hepatocellular carcinoma and interobserver agreement for liver imaging reporting and data system on CT using deep learning reconstruction
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection performance, interobserver agreement for Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) categories, and image quality between deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and conventional hybrid iterative reconstruction (Hybr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10115733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36757454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03834-z |
_version_ | 1785028273161371648 |
---|---|
author | Okimoto, Naomasa Yasaka, Koichiro Kaiume, Masafumi Kanemaru, Noriko Suzuki, Yuichi Abe, Osamu |
author_facet | Okimoto, Naomasa Yasaka, Koichiro Kaiume, Masafumi Kanemaru, Noriko Suzuki, Yuichi Abe, Osamu |
author_sort | Okimoto, Naomasa |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection performance, interobserver agreement for Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) categories, and image quality between deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and conventional hybrid iterative reconstruction (Hybrid IR) in CT. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced CT between October 2021 and March 2022. Arterial, portal, and delayed phase images were reconstructed using DLR and Hybrid IR. Two blinded readers independently read the image sets with detecting HCCs, scoring LI-RADS, and evaluating image quality. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients with HCC (mean age, 73 years ± 12.3) and 23 patients without HCC (mean age, 66 years ± 14.7) were included. The figures of merit (FOM) for the jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis in detecting HCC averaged for the readers were 0.925 (reader 1, 0.937; reader 2, 0.913) in DLR and 0.878 (reader 1, 0.904; reader 2, 0.851) in Hybrid IR, and the FOM in DLR were significantly higher than that in Hybrid IR (p = 0.038). The interobserver agreement (Cohen’s weighted kappa statistics) for LI-RADS categories was moderate for DLR (0.595; 95% CI, 0.585–0.605) and significantly superior to Hybrid IR (0.568; 95% CI, 0.553–0.582). According to both readers, DLR was significantly superior to Hybrid IR in terms of image quality (p ≤ 0.021). CONCLUSION: DLR improved HCC detection, interobserver agreement for LI-RADS categories, and image quality in evaluations of HCC compared to Hybrid IR in abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced CT. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10115733 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101157332023-04-21 Improving detection performance of hepatocellular carcinoma and interobserver agreement for liver imaging reporting and data system on CT using deep learning reconstruction Okimoto, Naomasa Yasaka, Koichiro Kaiume, Masafumi Kanemaru, Noriko Suzuki, Yuichi Abe, Osamu Abdom Radiol (NY) Hepatobiliary PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection performance, interobserver agreement for Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) categories, and image quality between deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and conventional hybrid iterative reconstruction (Hybrid IR) in CT. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced CT between October 2021 and March 2022. Arterial, portal, and delayed phase images were reconstructed using DLR and Hybrid IR. Two blinded readers independently read the image sets with detecting HCCs, scoring LI-RADS, and evaluating image quality. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients with HCC (mean age, 73 years ± 12.3) and 23 patients without HCC (mean age, 66 years ± 14.7) were included. The figures of merit (FOM) for the jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis in detecting HCC averaged for the readers were 0.925 (reader 1, 0.937; reader 2, 0.913) in DLR and 0.878 (reader 1, 0.904; reader 2, 0.851) in Hybrid IR, and the FOM in DLR were significantly higher than that in Hybrid IR (p = 0.038). The interobserver agreement (Cohen’s weighted kappa statistics) for LI-RADS categories was moderate for DLR (0.595; 95% CI, 0.585–0.605) and significantly superior to Hybrid IR (0.568; 95% CI, 0.553–0.582). According to both readers, DLR was significantly superior to Hybrid IR in terms of image quality (p ≤ 0.021). CONCLUSION: DLR improved HCC detection, interobserver agreement for LI-RADS categories, and image quality in evaluations of HCC compared to Hybrid IR in abdominal dynamic contrast-enhanced CT. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer US 2023-02-09 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10115733/ /pubmed/36757454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03834-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Hepatobiliary Okimoto, Naomasa Yasaka, Koichiro Kaiume, Masafumi Kanemaru, Noriko Suzuki, Yuichi Abe, Osamu Improving detection performance of hepatocellular carcinoma and interobserver agreement for liver imaging reporting and data system on CT using deep learning reconstruction |
title | Improving detection performance of hepatocellular carcinoma and interobserver agreement for liver imaging reporting and data system on CT using deep learning reconstruction |
title_full | Improving detection performance of hepatocellular carcinoma and interobserver agreement for liver imaging reporting and data system on CT using deep learning reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Improving detection performance of hepatocellular carcinoma and interobserver agreement for liver imaging reporting and data system on CT using deep learning reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving detection performance of hepatocellular carcinoma and interobserver agreement for liver imaging reporting and data system on CT using deep learning reconstruction |
title_short | Improving detection performance of hepatocellular carcinoma and interobserver agreement for liver imaging reporting and data system on CT using deep learning reconstruction |
title_sort | improving detection performance of hepatocellular carcinoma and interobserver agreement for liver imaging reporting and data system on ct using deep learning reconstruction |
topic | Hepatobiliary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10115733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36757454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03834-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT okimotonaomasa improvingdetectionperformanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaandinterobserveragreementforliverimagingreportinganddatasystemonctusingdeeplearningreconstruction AT yasakakoichiro improvingdetectionperformanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaandinterobserveragreementforliverimagingreportinganddatasystemonctusingdeeplearningreconstruction AT kaiumemasafumi improvingdetectionperformanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaandinterobserveragreementforliverimagingreportinganddatasystemonctusingdeeplearningreconstruction AT kanemarunoriko improvingdetectionperformanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaandinterobserveragreementforliverimagingreportinganddatasystemonctusingdeeplearningreconstruction AT suzukiyuichi improvingdetectionperformanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaandinterobserveragreementforliverimagingreportinganddatasystemonctusingdeeplearningreconstruction AT abeosamu improvingdetectionperformanceofhepatocellularcarcinomaandinterobserveragreementforliverimagingreportinganddatasystemonctusingdeeplearningreconstruction |