Cargando…
Distinctive characteristics of prolonged standing low back pain developers’ and the associated risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis
Pain developers (PDs) are considered a pre-clinical low back pain (LBP) population at risk of clinical LBP development and thus exacting great social and economic costs. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively investigate their distinctive characteristics and the risk factors of standing-induc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10115839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37076546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33590-5 |
_version_ | 1785028293633769472 |
---|---|
author | Khoshroo, Fatemeh Seidi, Foad Bayattork, Mohammad Moghadas-Tabrizi, Yousef Nelson-Wong, Erika |
author_facet | Khoshroo, Fatemeh Seidi, Foad Bayattork, Mohammad Moghadas-Tabrizi, Yousef Nelson-Wong, Erika |
author_sort | Khoshroo, Fatemeh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pain developers (PDs) are considered a pre-clinical low back pain (LBP) population at risk of clinical LBP development and thus exacting great social and economic costs. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively investigate their distinctive characteristics and the risk factors of standing-induced LBP based on which appropriate preventive measures can be planned. Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases as well as Google Scholar and ProQuest were systematically searched from inception through 14 July 2022 using a combination of terms relevant to ‘standing’ and ‘LBP’. Studies with low risk of bias in English and Persian using a methodological quality scoring system were deemed eligible for inclusion if they were laboratory studies using prolonged standing duration greater than 42 min to classify adult PDs and non-pain developers (NPDs) without a history of LBP. PDs were compared with NPDs in demographics, biomechanical, and psychological outcomes. Weighted or standardized mean differences, and Hedge’s g were generated to determine the pooled effect sizes using STATA software version 17. 52 papers and theses involving 1070 participants (528 PDs and 542 NPDs) were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review 33 of which were used in meta-analyses. Significant differences between PDs and NPDs in terms of movement patterns, muscular, postural, psychological, structural, and anthropometric variables were evidenced. The following factors were found to have a statistically significant association with standing-induced LBP: lumbar fidgets (Hedge’s g − 0.72, 95% CI − 1.35 to − 0.08, P = 0.03), lumbar lordosis in participants over 25 years (Hedge’s g 2.75, 95% CI 1.89–3.61, P < 0.001), AHAbd test (WMD 0.7, 95% CI 0.36–1.05, P < 0.001), GMed co-activation (Hedge’s g 4.24, 95% CI 3.18–5.3, P < 0.001), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (WMD 2.85, 95% CI 0.51–5.19, P = 0.02). Altered motor control displayed in AHAbd test and higher lumbar lordosis in individuals over 25 years seem to be probable risk factors for standing-induced LBP. In order to detect standing-induced LBP risk factors, future researchers should investigate the association of the reported distinctive characteristics to the standing-induced LBP and that whether they are manipulable through various interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10115839 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101158392023-04-21 Distinctive characteristics of prolonged standing low back pain developers’ and the associated risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis Khoshroo, Fatemeh Seidi, Foad Bayattork, Mohammad Moghadas-Tabrizi, Yousef Nelson-Wong, Erika Sci Rep Article Pain developers (PDs) are considered a pre-clinical low back pain (LBP) population at risk of clinical LBP development and thus exacting great social and economic costs. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively investigate their distinctive characteristics and the risk factors of standing-induced LBP based on which appropriate preventive measures can be planned. Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases as well as Google Scholar and ProQuest were systematically searched from inception through 14 July 2022 using a combination of terms relevant to ‘standing’ and ‘LBP’. Studies with low risk of bias in English and Persian using a methodological quality scoring system were deemed eligible for inclusion if they were laboratory studies using prolonged standing duration greater than 42 min to classify adult PDs and non-pain developers (NPDs) without a history of LBP. PDs were compared with NPDs in demographics, biomechanical, and psychological outcomes. Weighted or standardized mean differences, and Hedge’s g were generated to determine the pooled effect sizes using STATA software version 17. 52 papers and theses involving 1070 participants (528 PDs and 542 NPDs) were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review 33 of which were used in meta-analyses. Significant differences between PDs and NPDs in terms of movement patterns, muscular, postural, psychological, structural, and anthropometric variables were evidenced. The following factors were found to have a statistically significant association with standing-induced LBP: lumbar fidgets (Hedge’s g − 0.72, 95% CI − 1.35 to − 0.08, P = 0.03), lumbar lordosis in participants over 25 years (Hedge’s g 2.75, 95% CI 1.89–3.61, P < 0.001), AHAbd test (WMD 0.7, 95% CI 0.36–1.05, P < 0.001), GMed co-activation (Hedge’s g 4.24, 95% CI 3.18–5.3, P < 0.001), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (WMD 2.85, 95% CI 0.51–5.19, P = 0.02). Altered motor control displayed in AHAbd test and higher lumbar lordosis in individuals over 25 years seem to be probable risk factors for standing-induced LBP. In order to detect standing-induced LBP risk factors, future researchers should investigate the association of the reported distinctive characteristics to the standing-induced LBP and that whether they are manipulable through various interventions. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10115839/ /pubmed/37076546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33590-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Khoshroo, Fatemeh Seidi, Foad Bayattork, Mohammad Moghadas-Tabrizi, Yousef Nelson-Wong, Erika Distinctive characteristics of prolonged standing low back pain developers’ and the associated risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Distinctive characteristics of prolonged standing low back pain developers’ and the associated risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Distinctive characteristics of prolonged standing low back pain developers’ and the associated risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Distinctive characteristics of prolonged standing low back pain developers’ and the associated risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Distinctive characteristics of prolonged standing low back pain developers’ and the associated risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Distinctive characteristics of prolonged standing low back pain developers’ and the associated risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | distinctive characteristics of prolonged standing low back pain developers’ and the associated risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10115839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37076546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33590-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khoshroofatemeh distinctivecharacteristicsofprolongedstandinglowbackpaindevelopersandtheassociatedriskfactorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT seidifoad distinctivecharacteristicsofprolongedstandinglowbackpaindevelopersandtheassociatedriskfactorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bayattorkmohammad distinctivecharacteristicsofprolongedstandinglowbackpaindevelopersandtheassociatedriskfactorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT moghadastabriziyousef distinctivecharacteristicsofprolongedstandinglowbackpaindevelopersandtheassociatedriskfactorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT nelsonwongerika distinctivecharacteristicsofprolongedstandinglowbackpaindevelopersandtheassociatedriskfactorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |