Cargando…

Distinctive characteristics of prolonged standing low back pain developers’ and the associated risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis

Pain developers (PDs) are considered a pre-clinical low back pain (LBP) population at risk of clinical LBP development and thus exacting great social and economic costs. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively investigate their distinctive characteristics and the risk factors of standing-induc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khoshroo, Fatemeh, Seidi, Foad, Bayattork, Mohammad, Moghadas-Tabrizi, Yousef, Nelson-Wong, Erika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10115839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37076546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33590-5
_version_ 1785028293633769472
author Khoshroo, Fatemeh
Seidi, Foad
Bayattork, Mohammad
Moghadas-Tabrizi, Yousef
Nelson-Wong, Erika
author_facet Khoshroo, Fatemeh
Seidi, Foad
Bayattork, Mohammad
Moghadas-Tabrizi, Yousef
Nelson-Wong, Erika
author_sort Khoshroo, Fatemeh
collection PubMed
description Pain developers (PDs) are considered a pre-clinical low back pain (LBP) population at risk of clinical LBP development and thus exacting great social and economic costs. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively investigate their distinctive characteristics and the risk factors of standing-induced LBP based on which appropriate preventive measures can be planned. Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases as well as Google Scholar and ProQuest were systematically searched from inception through 14 July 2022 using a combination of terms relevant to ‘standing’ and ‘LBP’. Studies with low risk of bias in English and Persian using a methodological quality scoring system were deemed eligible for inclusion if they were laboratory studies using prolonged standing duration greater than 42 min to classify adult PDs and non-pain developers (NPDs) without a history of LBP. PDs were compared with NPDs in demographics, biomechanical, and psychological outcomes. Weighted or standardized mean differences, and Hedge’s g were generated to determine the pooled effect sizes using STATA software version 17. 52 papers and theses involving 1070 participants (528 PDs and 542 NPDs) were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review 33 of which were used in meta-analyses. Significant differences between PDs and NPDs in terms of movement patterns, muscular, postural, psychological, structural, and anthropometric variables were evidenced. The following factors were found to have a statistically significant association with standing-induced LBP: lumbar fidgets (Hedge’s g − 0.72, 95% CI − 1.35 to − 0.08, P = 0.03), lumbar lordosis in participants over 25 years (Hedge’s g 2.75, 95% CI 1.89–3.61, P < 0.001), AHAbd test (WMD 0.7, 95% CI 0.36–1.05, P < 0.001), GMed co-activation (Hedge’s g 4.24, 95% CI 3.18–5.3, P < 0.001), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (WMD 2.85, 95% CI 0.51–5.19, P = 0.02). Altered motor control displayed in AHAbd test and higher lumbar lordosis in individuals over 25 years seem to be probable risk factors for standing-induced LBP. In order to detect standing-induced LBP risk factors, future researchers should investigate the association of the reported distinctive characteristics to the standing-induced LBP and that whether they are manipulable through various interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10115839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101158392023-04-21 Distinctive characteristics of prolonged standing low back pain developers’ and the associated risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis Khoshroo, Fatemeh Seidi, Foad Bayattork, Mohammad Moghadas-Tabrizi, Yousef Nelson-Wong, Erika Sci Rep Article Pain developers (PDs) are considered a pre-clinical low back pain (LBP) population at risk of clinical LBP development and thus exacting great social and economic costs. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively investigate their distinctive characteristics and the risk factors of standing-induced LBP based on which appropriate preventive measures can be planned. Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases as well as Google Scholar and ProQuest were systematically searched from inception through 14 July 2022 using a combination of terms relevant to ‘standing’ and ‘LBP’. Studies with low risk of bias in English and Persian using a methodological quality scoring system were deemed eligible for inclusion if they were laboratory studies using prolonged standing duration greater than 42 min to classify adult PDs and non-pain developers (NPDs) without a history of LBP. PDs were compared with NPDs in demographics, biomechanical, and psychological outcomes. Weighted or standardized mean differences, and Hedge’s g were generated to determine the pooled effect sizes using STATA software version 17. 52 papers and theses involving 1070 participants (528 PDs and 542 NPDs) were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review 33 of which were used in meta-analyses. Significant differences between PDs and NPDs in terms of movement patterns, muscular, postural, psychological, structural, and anthropometric variables were evidenced. The following factors were found to have a statistically significant association with standing-induced LBP: lumbar fidgets (Hedge’s g − 0.72, 95% CI − 1.35 to − 0.08, P = 0.03), lumbar lordosis in participants over 25 years (Hedge’s g 2.75, 95% CI 1.89–3.61, P < 0.001), AHAbd test (WMD 0.7, 95% CI 0.36–1.05, P < 0.001), GMed co-activation (Hedge’s g 4.24, 95% CI 3.18–5.3, P < 0.001), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (WMD 2.85, 95% CI 0.51–5.19, P = 0.02). Altered motor control displayed in AHAbd test and higher lumbar lordosis in individuals over 25 years seem to be probable risk factors for standing-induced LBP. In order to detect standing-induced LBP risk factors, future researchers should investigate the association of the reported distinctive characteristics to the standing-induced LBP and that whether they are manipulable through various interventions. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10115839/ /pubmed/37076546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33590-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Khoshroo, Fatemeh
Seidi, Foad
Bayattork, Mohammad
Moghadas-Tabrizi, Yousef
Nelson-Wong, Erika
Distinctive characteristics of prolonged standing low back pain developers’ and the associated risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Distinctive characteristics of prolonged standing low back pain developers’ and the associated risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Distinctive characteristics of prolonged standing low back pain developers’ and the associated risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Distinctive characteristics of prolonged standing low back pain developers’ and the associated risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Distinctive characteristics of prolonged standing low back pain developers’ and the associated risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Distinctive characteristics of prolonged standing low back pain developers’ and the associated risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort distinctive characteristics of prolonged standing low back pain developers’ and the associated risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10115839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37076546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33590-5
work_keys_str_mv AT khoshroofatemeh distinctivecharacteristicsofprolongedstandinglowbackpaindevelopersandtheassociatedriskfactorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT seidifoad distinctivecharacteristicsofprolongedstandinglowbackpaindevelopersandtheassociatedriskfactorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bayattorkmohammad distinctivecharacteristicsofprolongedstandinglowbackpaindevelopersandtheassociatedriskfactorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT moghadastabriziyousef distinctivecharacteristicsofprolongedstandinglowbackpaindevelopersandtheassociatedriskfactorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nelsonwongerika distinctivecharacteristicsofprolongedstandinglowbackpaindevelopersandtheassociatedriskfactorssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis