Cargando…
Efficacy of electrical cranial stimulation for treatment of psychiatric symptoms in patients with anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic effects of electrical cranial stimulation (CES) in patients suffering from anxiety remained unclear. This meta-analysis aimed at investigating acceptability and therapeutic efficacy of CES against anxiety, depression, and insomnia for patients who experienced symptoms of anxi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10115990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37091717 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1157473 |
_version_ | 1785028326192054272 |
---|---|
author | Chung, Feng-Chin Sun, Cheuk-Kwan Chen, Yi Cheng, Yu-Shian Chung, Weilun Tzang, Ruu-Fen Chiu, Hsien-Jane Wang, Ming-Yu Cheng, Ying-Chih Hung, Kuo-Chuan |
author_facet | Chung, Feng-Chin Sun, Cheuk-Kwan Chen, Yi Cheng, Yu-Shian Chung, Weilun Tzang, Ruu-Fen Chiu, Hsien-Jane Wang, Ming-Yu Cheng, Ying-Chih Hung, Kuo-Chuan |
author_sort | Chung, Feng-Chin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Therapeutic effects of electrical cranial stimulation (CES) in patients suffering from anxiety remained unclear. This meta-analysis aimed at investigating acceptability and therapeutic efficacy of CES against anxiety, depression, and insomnia for patients who experienced symptoms of anxiety. METHODS: Major electronic databases were searched from inception until December 10, 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) focusing on therapeutic effectiveness of CES in patients whose primary complaints included anxiety. Effect sizes (ES) for different treatment outcomes were estimated by using generic inverse variance method. RESULTS: Eight RCTs were identified including a total of 337 participants. The therapeutic effectiveness of CES was significantly better than that in the control groups for anxiety (ES=-0.96, p <0.00001, eight trials, 337 patients), depression (ES=-0.69, p=0.003, five trials), and insomnia (ES=-1.02, p = 0.0006, three trials) in those who presented with symptoms of anxiety. Subgroup analyses found that CES was equally effective regardless of comorbid presentation of depressive symptoms (ES=-0.94 in patients with anxiety only vs. ES=-1.06 in those with depression and anxiety) and whether CES was used as monotherapy or add-on therapy to medications (ES = −0.88 vs. ES = −1.12, respectively). Moreover, subgroup analysis of RCTs using the same device “Alpha-Stim” for CES was more effective in alleviating anxiety than sham controls (ES = −0.88, p < 0.00001, four trials, 230 patients). Regarding acceptability, the use of CES did not increase the risk of treatment-related dropout compared to the control group (RR = 1.26, p = 0.57, I(2) = 0%, four trials, 324 patients). CONCLUSION: Our study supported the use of CES for symptoms of anxiety, depression, and insomnia in those suffering from anxiety with fair acceptability and demonstrated the efficacy of “Alpha-Stim”, the most commonly used device for CES, in this patient population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022382619. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10115990 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101159902023-04-21 Efficacy of electrical cranial stimulation for treatment of psychiatric symptoms in patients with anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis Chung, Feng-Chin Sun, Cheuk-Kwan Chen, Yi Cheng, Yu-Shian Chung, Weilun Tzang, Ruu-Fen Chiu, Hsien-Jane Wang, Ming-Yu Cheng, Ying-Chih Hung, Kuo-Chuan Front Psychiatry Psychiatry BACKGROUND: Therapeutic effects of electrical cranial stimulation (CES) in patients suffering from anxiety remained unclear. This meta-analysis aimed at investigating acceptability and therapeutic efficacy of CES against anxiety, depression, and insomnia for patients who experienced symptoms of anxiety. METHODS: Major electronic databases were searched from inception until December 10, 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) focusing on therapeutic effectiveness of CES in patients whose primary complaints included anxiety. Effect sizes (ES) for different treatment outcomes were estimated by using generic inverse variance method. RESULTS: Eight RCTs were identified including a total of 337 participants. The therapeutic effectiveness of CES was significantly better than that in the control groups for anxiety (ES=-0.96, p <0.00001, eight trials, 337 patients), depression (ES=-0.69, p=0.003, five trials), and insomnia (ES=-1.02, p = 0.0006, three trials) in those who presented with symptoms of anxiety. Subgroup analyses found that CES was equally effective regardless of comorbid presentation of depressive symptoms (ES=-0.94 in patients with anxiety only vs. ES=-1.06 in those with depression and anxiety) and whether CES was used as monotherapy or add-on therapy to medications (ES = −0.88 vs. ES = −1.12, respectively). Moreover, subgroup analysis of RCTs using the same device “Alpha-Stim” for CES was more effective in alleviating anxiety than sham controls (ES = −0.88, p < 0.00001, four trials, 230 patients). Regarding acceptability, the use of CES did not increase the risk of treatment-related dropout compared to the control group (RR = 1.26, p = 0.57, I(2) = 0%, four trials, 324 patients). CONCLUSION: Our study supported the use of CES for symptoms of anxiety, depression, and insomnia in those suffering from anxiety with fair acceptability and demonstrated the efficacy of “Alpha-Stim”, the most commonly used device for CES, in this patient population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022382619. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10115990/ /pubmed/37091717 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1157473 Text en Copyright © 2023 Chung, Sun, Chen, Cheng, Chung, Tzang, Chiu, Wang, Cheng and Hung. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Chung, Feng-Chin Sun, Cheuk-Kwan Chen, Yi Cheng, Yu-Shian Chung, Weilun Tzang, Ruu-Fen Chiu, Hsien-Jane Wang, Ming-Yu Cheng, Ying-Chih Hung, Kuo-Chuan Efficacy of electrical cranial stimulation for treatment of psychiatric symptoms in patients with anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy of electrical cranial stimulation for treatment of psychiatric symptoms in patients with anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy of electrical cranial stimulation for treatment of psychiatric symptoms in patients with anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of electrical cranial stimulation for treatment of psychiatric symptoms in patients with anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of electrical cranial stimulation for treatment of psychiatric symptoms in patients with anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy of electrical cranial stimulation for treatment of psychiatric symptoms in patients with anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy of electrical cranial stimulation for treatment of psychiatric symptoms in patients with anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10115990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37091717 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1157473 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chungfengchin efficacyofelectricalcranialstimulationfortreatmentofpsychiatricsymptomsinpatientswithanxietyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT suncheukkwan efficacyofelectricalcranialstimulationfortreatmentofpsychiatricsymptomsinpatientswithanxietyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chenyi efficacyofelectricalcranialstimulationfortreatmentofpsychiatricsymptomsinpatientswithanxietyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chengyushian efficacyofelectricalcranialstimulationfortreatmentofpsychiatricsymptomsinpatientswithanxietyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chungweilun efficacyofelectricalcranialstimulationfortreatmentofpsychiatricsymptomsinpatientswithanxietyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT tzangruufen efficacyofelectricalcranialstimulationfortreatmentofpsychiatricsymptomsinpatientswithanxietyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chiuhsienjane efficacyofelectricalcranialstimulationfortreatmentofpsychiatricsymptomsinpatientswithanxietyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangmingyu efficacyofelectricalcranialstimulationfortreatmentofpsychiatricsymptomsinpatientswithanxietyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chengyingchih efficacyofelectricalcranialstimulationfortreatmentofpsychiatricsymptomsinpatientswithanxietyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hungkuochuan efficacyofelectricalcranialstimulationfortreatmentofpsychiatricsymptomsinpatientswithanxietyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |