Cargando…

Efficacy of electrical cranial stimulation for treatment of psychiatric symptoms in patients with anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic effects of electrical cranial stimulation (CES) in patients suffering from anxiety remained unclear. This meta-analysis aimed at investigating acceptability and therapeutic efficacy of CES against anxiety, depression, and insomnia for patients who experienced symptoms of anxi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Feng-Chin, Sun, Cheuk-Kwan, Chen, Yi, Cheng, Yu-Shian, Chung, Weilun, Tzang, Ruu-Fen, Chiu, Hsien-Jane, Wang, Ming-Yu, Cheng, Ying-Chih, Hung, Kuo-Chuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10115990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37091717
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1157473
_version_ 1785028326192054272
author Chung, Feng-Chin
Sun, Cheuk-Kwan
Chen, Yi
Cheng, Yu-Shian
Chung, Weilun
Tzang, Ruu-Fen
Chiu, Hsien-Jane
Wang, Ming-Yu
Cheng, Ying-Chih
Hung, Kuo-Chuan
author_facet Chung, Feng-Chin
Sun, Cheuk-Kwan
Chen, Yi
Cheng, Yu-Shian
Chung, Weilun
Tzang, Ruu-Fen
Chiu, Hsien-Jane
Wang, Ming-Yu
Cheng, Ying-Chih
Hung, Kuo-Chuan
author_sort Chung, Feng-Chin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Therapeutic effects of electrical cranial stimulation (CES) in patients suffering from anxiety remained unclear. This meta-analysis aimed at investigating acceptability and therapeutic efficacy of CES against anxiety, depression, and insomnia for patients who experienced symptoms of anxiety. METHODS: Major electronic databases were searched from inception until December 10, 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) focusing on therapeutic effectiveness of CES in patients whose primary complaints included anxiety. Effect sizes (ES) for different treatment outcomes were estimated by using generic inverse variance method. RESULTS: Eight RCTs were identified including a total of 337 participants. The therapeutic effectiveness of CES was significantly better than that in the control groups for anxiety (ES=-0.96, p <0.00001, eight trials, 337 patients), depression (ES=-0.69, p=0.003, five trials), and insomnia (ES=-1.02, p = 0.0006, three trials) in those who presented with symptoms of anxiety. Subgroup analyses found that CES was equally effective regardless of comorbid presentation of depressive symptoms (ES=-0.94 in patients with anxiety only vs. ES=-1.06 in those with depression and anxiety) and whether CES was used as monotherapy or add-on therapy to medications (ES = −0.88 vs. ES = −1.12, respectively). Moreover, subgroup analysis of RCTs using the same device “Alpha-Stim” for CES was more effective in alleviating anxiety than sham controls (ES = −0.88, p < 0.00001, four trials, 230 patients). Regarding acceptability, the use of CES did not increase the risk of treatment-related dropout compared to the control group (RR = 1.26, p = 0.57, I(2) = 0%, four trials, 324 patients). CONCLUSION: Our study supported the use of CES for symptoms of anxiety, depression, and insomnia in those suffering from anxiety with fair acceptability and demonstrated the efficacy of “Alpha-Stim”, the most commonly used device for CES, in this patient population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022382619.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10115990
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101159902023-04-21 Efficacy of electrical cranial stimulation for treatment of psychiatric symptoms in patients with anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis Chung, Feng-Chin Sun, Cheuk-Kwan Chen, Yi Cheng, Yu-Shian Chung, Weilun Tzang, Ruu-Fen Chiu, Hsien-Jane Wang, Ming-Yu Cheng, Ying-Chih Hung, Kuo-Chuan Front Psychiatry Psychiatry BACKGROUND: Therapeutic effects of electrical cranial stimulation (CES) in patients suffering from anxiety remained unclear. This meta-analysis aimed at investigating acceptability and therapeutic efficacy of CES against anxiety, depression, and insomnia for patients who experienced symptoms of anxiety. METHODS: Major electronic databases were searched from inception until December 10, 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) focusing on therapeutic effectiveness of CES in patients whose primary complaints included anxiety. Effect sizes (ES) for different treatment outcomes were estimated by using generic inverse variance method. RESULTS: Eight RCTs were identified including a total of 337 participants. The therapeutic effectiveness of CES was significantly better than that in the control groups for anxiety (ES=-0.96, p <0.00001, eight trials, 337 patients), depression (ES=-0.69, p=0.003, five trials), and insomnia (ES=-1.02, p = 0.0006, three trials) in those who presented with symptoms of anxiety. Subgroup analyses found that CES was equally effective regardless of comorbid presentation of depressive symptoms (ES=-0.94 in patients with anxiety only vs. ES=-1.06 in those with depression and anxiety) and whether CES was used as monotherapy or add-on therapy to medications (ES = −0.88 vs. ES = −1.12, respectively). Moreover, subgroup analysis of RCTs using the same device “Alpha-Stim” for CES was more effective in alleviating anxiety than sham controls (ES = −0.88, p < 0.00001, four trials, 230 patients). Regarding acceptability, the use of CES did not increase the risk of treatment-related dropout compared to the control group (RR = 1.26, p = 0.57, I(2) = 0%, four trials, 324 patients). CONCLUSION: Our study supported the use of CES for symptoms of anxiety, depression, and insomnia in those suffering from anxiety with fair acceptability and demonstrated the efficacy of “Alpha-Stim”, the most commonly used device for CES, in this patient population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42022382619. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10115990/ /pubmed/37091717 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1157473 Text en Copyright © 2023 Chung, Sun, Chen, Cheng, Chung, Tzang, Chiu, Wang, Cheng and Hung. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Chung, Feng-Chin
Sun, Cheuk-Kwan
Chen, Yi
Cheng, Yu-Shian
Chung, Weilun
Tzang, Ruu-Fen
Chiu, Hsien-Jane
Wang, Ming-Yu
Cheng, Ying-Chih
Hung, Kuo-Chuan
Efficacy of electrical cranial stimulation for treatment of psychiatric symptoms in patients with anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy of electrical cranial stimulation for treatment of psychiatric symptoms in patients with anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy of electrical cranial stimulation for treatment of psychiatric symptoms in patients with anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of electrical cranial stimulation for treatment of psychiatric symptoms in patients with anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of electrical cranial stimulation for treatment of psychiatric symptoms in patients with anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy of electrical cranial stimulation for treatment of psychiatric symptoms in patients with anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of electrical cranial stimulation for treatment of psychiatric symptoms in patients with anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10115990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37091717
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1157473
work_keys_str_mv AT chungfengchin efficacyofelectricalcranialstimulationfortreatmentofpsychiatricsymptomsinpatientswithanxietyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT suncheukkwan efficacyofelectricalcranialstimulationfortreatmentofpsychiatricsymptomsinpatientswithanxietyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chenyi efficacyofelectricalcranialstimulationfortreatmentofpsychiatricsymptomsinpatientswithanxietyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chengyushian efficacyofelectricalcranialstimulationfortreatmentofpsychiatricsymptomsinpatientswithanxietyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chungweilun efficacyofelectricalcranialstimulationfortreatmentofpsychiatricsymptomsinpatientswithanxietyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tzangruufen efficacyofelectricalcranialstimulationfortreatmentofpsychiatricsymptomsinpatientswithanxietyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chiuhsienjane efficacyofelectricalcranialstimulationfortreatmentofpsychiatricsymptomsinpatientswithanxietyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangmingyu efficacyofelectricalcranialstimulationfortreatmentofpsychiatricsymptomsinpatientswithanxietyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chengyingchih efficacyofelectricalcranialstimulationfortreatmentofpsychiatricsymptomsinpatientswithanxietyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hungkuochuan efficacyofelectricalcranialstimulationfortreatmentofpsychiatricsymptomsinpatientswithanxietyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis