Cargando…
Effects of China’s low-carbon policy under stochastic shocks—a multi-agent DSGE model analysis
China has announced a target of achieving carbon peaking by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060. Therefore, it is important to assess the economic impacts and emission reduction effects of China’s low-carbon policies. In this paper, a multi-agent dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model is...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10116111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37079231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26942-1 |
_version_ | 1785028353128923136 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Xiaodan Xiao, Bowen |
author_facet | Guo, Xiaodan Xiao, Bowen |
author_sort | Guo, Xiaodan |
collection | PubMed |
description | China has announced a target of achieving carbon peaking by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060. Therefore, it is important to assess the economic impacts and emission reduction effects of China’s low-carbon policies. In this paper, a multi-agent dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model is established. We analyze the effects of carbon tax and carbon cap-and-trade policies under both deterministic and stochastic conditions, as well as their ability to cope with stochastic shocks. We found that (1) from a deterministic perspective, these two policies have the same effect. Every 1% cut in CO(2) emissions will bring a 0.12% output loss, a 0.5% drop in demand for fossil fuels, and a 0.05% rise in demand for renewable energy; (2) from a stochastic perspective, effects of these two policies are different. This is mainly because economic uncertainty does not change the cost of CO(2) emissions under a carbon tax policy, but it does change the price of CO(2) quotas and the emission reduction behaviors under a carbon cap-and-trade policy; (3) from an economic volatility perspective, both two policies can act as automatic stabilizers. Compared to a carbon tax, a cap-and-trade policy can better ease economic fluctuations. The results of this study provide implications for policy-making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10116111 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101161112023-04-25 Effects of China’s low-carbon policy under stochastic shocks—a multi-agent DSGE model analysis Guo, Xiaodan Xiao, Bowen Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Research Article China has announced a target of achieving carbon peaking by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060. Therefore, it is important to assess the economic impacts and emission reduction effects of China’s low-carbon policies. In this paper, a multi-agent dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model is established. We analyze the effects of carbon tax and carbon cap-and-trade policies under both deterministic and stochastic conditions, as well as their ability to cope with stochastic shocks. We found that (1) from a deterministic perspective, these two policies have the same effect. Every 1% cut in CO(2) emissions will bring a 0.12% output loss, a 0.5% drop in demand for fossil fuels, and a 0.05% rise in demand for renewable energy; (2) from a stochastic perspective, effects of these two policies are different. This is mainly because economic uncertainty does not change the cost of CO(2) emissions under a carbon tax policy, but it does change the price of CO(2) quotas and the emission reduction behaviors under a carbon cap-and-trade policy; (3) from an economic volatility perspective, both two policies can act as automatic stabilizers. Compared to a carbon tax, a cap-and-trade policy can better ease economic fluctuations. The results of this study provide implications for policy-making. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-04-20 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10116111/ /pubmed/37079231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26942-1 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Guo, Xiaodan Xiao, Bowen Effects of China’s low-carbon policy under stochastic shocks—a multi-agent DSGE model analysis |
title | Effects of China’s low-carbon policy under stochastic shocks—a multi-agent DSGE model analysis |
title_full | Effects of China’s low-carbon policy under stochastic shocks—a multi-agent DSGE model analysis |
title_fullStr | Effects of China’s low-carbon policy under stochastic shocks—a multi-agent DSGE model analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of China’s low-carbon policy under stochastic shocks—a multi-agent DSGE model analysis |
title_short | Effects of China’s low-carbon policy under stochastic shocks—a multi-agent DSGE model analysis |
title_sort | effects of china’s low-carbon policy under stochastic shocks—a multi-agent dsge model analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10116111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37079231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26942-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guoxiaodan effectsofchinaslowcarbonpolicyunderstochasticshocksamultiagentdsgemodelanalysis AT xiaobowen effectsofchinaslowcarbonpolicyunderstochasticshocksamultiagentdsgemodelanalysis |