Cargando…

Modeling Viscosity of CO(2)–N(2) Gaseous Mixtures Using Robust Tree-Based Techniques: Extra Tree, Random Forest, GBoost, and LightGBM

[Image: see text] Carbon dioxide (CO(2)) has an essential role in most enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods in the oil industry. Oil swelling and viscosity reduction are the dominant mechanisms in an immiscible CO(2)-EOR process. Besides numerous CO(2) applications in EOR, most oil reservoirs do not...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Haimin, Mahmoudzadeh, Atena, Amiri-Ramsheh, Behnam, Hemmati-Sarapardeh, Abdolhossein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10116627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37091404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00228
_version_ 1785028465627496448
author Zheng, Haimin
Mahmoudzadeh, Atena
Amiri-Ramsheh, Behnam
Hemmati-Sarapardeh, Abdolhossein
author_facet Zheng, Haimin
Mahmoudzadeh, Atena
Amiri-Ramsheh, Behnam
Hemmati-Sarapardeh, Abdolhossein
author_sort Zheng, Haimin
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Carbon dioxide (CO(2)) has an essential role in most enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods in the oil industry. Oil swelling and viscosity reduction are the dominant mechanisms in an immiscible CO(2)-EOR process. Besides numerous CO(2) applications in EOR, most oil reservoirs do not have access to natural CO(2), and capturing it from flue gas and other sources is costly. Flue gases are available in huge quantities at a significantly lower price and can be considered economically viable agents for EOR operations. In this work, four powerful machine learning algorithms, namely, extra tree (ET), random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GBoost), and light gradient boosted machine (LightGBM) were utilized to accurately estimate the viscosity of CO(2)–N(2) mixtures. To this aim, a databank was employed, containing 3036 data points over wide ranges of pressures and temperatures. Temperature, pressure, and CO(2) mole fraction were applied as input parameters, and the viscosity of the CO(2)–N(2) mixture was the output. The RF smart model had the highest precision with the lowest average absolute percent relative error (AAPRE) of 1.58%, root mean square error (RMSE) of 2.221, and determination coefficient (R(2)) of 0.9993. The trend analysis showed that the RF model could precisely predict the real physical behavior of the CO(2)–N(2) viscosity variation. Finally, the outlier detection was performed using the leverage approach to demonstrate the validity of the utilized databank and the applicability area of the developed RF model. Accordingly, nearly 96% of the data points seemed to be dependable and valid, and the rest of them were located in the suspected and out-of-leverage data zones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10116627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101166272023-04-21 Modeling Viscosity of CO(2)–N(2) Gaseous Mixtures Using Robust Tree-Based Techniques: Extra Tree, Random Forest, GBoost, and LightGBM Zheng, Haimin Mahmoudzadeh, Atena Amiri-Ramsheh, Behnam Hemmati-Sarapardeh, Abdolhossein ACS Omega [Image: see text] Carbon dioxide (CO(2)) has an essential role in most enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods in the oil industry. Oil swelling and viscosity reduction are the dominant mechanisms in an immiscible CO(2)-EOR process. Besides numerous CO(2) applications in EOR, most oil reservoirs do not have access to natural CO(2), and capturing it from flue gas and other sources is costly. Flue gases are available in huge quantities at a significantly lower price and can be considered economically viable agents for EOR operations. In this work, four powerful machine learning algorithms, namely, extra tree (ET), random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GBoost), and light gradient boosted machine (LightGBM) were utilized to accurately estimate the viscosity of CO(2)–N(2) mixtures. To this aim, a databank was employed, containing 3036 data points over wide ranges of pressures and temperatures. Temperature, pressure, and CO(2) mole fraction were applied as input parameters, and the viscosity of the CO(2)–N(2) mixture was the output. The RF smart model had the highest precision with the lowest average absolute percent relative error (AAPRE) of 1.58%, root mean square error (RMSE) of 2.221, and determination coefficient (R(2)) of 0.9993. The trend analysis showed that the RF model could precisely predict the real physical behavior of the CO(2)–N(2) viscosity variation. Finally, the outlier detection was performed using the leverage approach to demonstrate the validity of the utilized databank and the applicability area of the developed RF model. Accordingly, nearly 96% of the data points seemed to be dependable and valid, and the rest of them were located in the suspected and out-of-leverage data zones. American Chemical Society 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10116627/ /pubmed/37091404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00228 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Zheng, Haimin
Mahmoudzadeh, Atena
Amiri-Ramsheh, Behnam
Hemmati-Sarapardeh, Abdolhossein
Modeling Viscosity of CO(2)–N(2) Gaseous Mixtures Using Robust Tree-Based Techniques: Extra Tree, Random Forest, GBoost, and LightGBM
title Modeling Viscosity of CO(2)–N(2) Gaseous Mixtures Using Robust Tree-Based Techniques: Extra Tree, Random Forest, GBoost, and LightGBM
title_full Modeling Viscosity of CO(2)–N(2) Gaseous Mixtures Using Robust Tree-Based Techniques: Extra Tree, Random Forest, GBoost, and LightGBM
title_fullStr Modeling Viscosity of CO(2)–N(2) Gaseous Mixtures Using Robust Tree-Based Techniques: Extra Tree, Random Forest, GBoost, and LightGBM
title_full_unstemmed Modeling Viscosity of CO(2)–N(2) Gaseous Mixtures Using Robust Tree-Based Techniques: Extra Tree, Random Forest, GBoost, and LightGBM
title_short Modeling Viscosity of CO(2)–N(2) Gaseous Mixtures Using Robust Tree-Based Techniques: Extra Tree, Random Forest, GBoost, and LightGBM
title_sort modeling viscosity of co(2)–n(2) gaseous mixtures using robust tree-based techniques: extra tree, random forest, gboost, and lightgbm
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10116627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37091404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00228
work_keys_str_mv AT zhenghaimin modelingviscosityofco2n2gaseousmixturesusingrobusttreebasedtechniquesextratreerandomforestgboostandlightgbm
AT mahmoudzadehatena modelingviscosityofco2n2gaseousmixturesusingrobusttreebasedtechniquesextratreerandomforestgboostandlightgbm
AT amiriramshehbehnam modelingviscosityofco2n2gaseousmixturesusingrobusttreebasedtechniquesextratreerandomforestgboostandlightgbm
AT hemmatisarapardehabdolhossein modelingviscosityofco2n2gaseousmixturesusingrobusttreebasedtechniquesextratreerandomforestgboostandlightgbm