Cargando…
Modeling Viscosity of CO(2)–N(2) Gaseous Mixtures Using Robust Tree-Based Techniques: Extra Tree, Random Forest, GBoost, and LightGBM
[Image: see text] Carbon dioxide (CO(2)) has an essential role in most enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods in the oil industry. Oil swelling and viscosity reduction are the dominant mechanisms in an immiscible CO(2)-EOR process. Besides numerous CO(2) applications in EOR, most oil reservoirs do not...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10116627/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37091404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00228 |
_version_ | 1785028465627496448 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, Haimin Mahmoudzadeh, Atena Amiri-Ramsheh, Behnam Hemmati-Sarapardeh, Abdolhossein |
author_facet | Zheng, Haimin Mahmoudzadeh, Atena Amiri-Ramsheh, Behnam Hemmati-Sarapardeh, Abdolhossein |
author_sort | Zheng, Haimin |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Carbon dioxide (CO(2)) has an essential role in most enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods in the oil industry. Oil swelling and viscosity reduction are the dominant mechanisms in an immiscible CO(2)-EOR process. Besides numerous CO(2) applications in EOR, most oil reservoirs do not have access to natural CO(2), and capturing it from flue gas and other sources is costly. Flue gases are available in huge quantities at a significantly lower price and can be considered economically viable agents for EOR operations. In this work, four powerful machine learning algorithms, namely, extra tree (ET), random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GBoost), and light gradient boosted machine (LightGBM) were utilized to accurately estimate the viscosity of CO(2)–N(2) mixtures. To this aim, a databank was employed, containing 3036 data points over wide ranges of pressures and temperatures. Temperature, pressure, and CO(2) mole fraction were applied as input parameters, and the viscosity of the CO(2)–N(2) mixture was the output. The RF smart model had the highest precision with the lowest average absolute percent relative error (AAPRE) of 1.58%, root mean square error (RMSE) of 2.221, and determination coefficient (R(2)) of 0.9993. The trend analysis showed that the RF model could precisely predict the real physical behavior of the CO(2)–N(2) viscosity variation. Finally, the outlier detection was performed using the leverage approach to demonstrate the validity of the utilized databank and the applicability area of the developed RF model. Accordingly, nearly 96% of the data points seemed to be dependable and valid, and the rest of them were located in the suspected and out-of-leverage data zones. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10116627 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101166272023-04-21 Modeling Viscosity of CO(2)–N(2) Gaseous Mixtures Using Robust Tree-Based Techniques: Extra Tree, Random Forest, GBoost, and LightGBM Zheng, Haimin Mahmoudzadeh, Atena Amiri-Ramsheh, Behnam Hemmati-Sarapardeh, Abdolhossein ACS Omega [Image: see text] Carbon dioxide (CO(2)) has an essential role in most enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods in the oil industry. Oil swelling and viscosity reduction are the dominant mechanisms in an immiscible CO(2)-EOR process. Besides numerous CO(2) applications in EOR, most oil reservoirs do not have access to natural CO(2), and capturing it from flue gas and other sources is costly. Flue gases are available in huge quantities at a significantly lower price and can be considered economically viable agents for EOR operations. In this work, four powerful machine learning algorithms, namely, extra tree (ET), random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GBoost), and light gradient boosted machine (LightGBM) were utilized to accurately estimate the viscosity of CO(2)–N(2) mixtures. To this aim, a databank was employed, containing 3036 data points over wide ranges of pressures and temperatures. Temperature, pressure, and CO(2) mole fraction were applied as input parameters, and the viscosity of the CO(2)–N(2) mixture was the output. The RF smart model had the highest precision with the lowest average absolute percent relative error (AAPRE) of 1.58%, root mean square error (RMSE) of 2.221, and determination coefficient (R(2)) of 0.9993. The trend analysis showed that the RF model could precisely predict the real physical behavior of the CO(2)–N(2) viscosity variation. Finally, the outlier detection was performed using the leverage approach to demonstrate the validity of the utilized databank and the applicability area of the developed RF model. Accordingly, nearly 96% of the data points seemed to be dependable and valid, and the rest of them were located in the suspected and out-of-leverage data zones. American Chemical Society 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10116627/ /pubmed/37091404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00228 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Zheng, Haimin Mahmoudzadeh, Atena Amiri-Ramsheh, Behnam Hemmati-Sarapardeh, Abdolhossein Modeling Viscosity of CO(2)–N(2) Gaseous Mixtures Using Robust Tree-Based Techniques: Extra Tree, Random Forest, GBoost, and LightGBM |
title | Modeling Viscosity
of CO(2)–N(2) Gaseous Mixtures Using Robust
Tree-Based Techniques: Extra
Tree, Random Forest, GBoost, and LightGBM |
title_full | Modeling Viscosity
of CO(2)–N(2) Gaseous Mixtures Using Robust
Tree-Based Techniques: Extra
Tree, Random Forest, GBoost, and LightGBM |
title_fullStr | Modeling Viscosity
of CO(2)–N(2) Gaseous Mixtures Using Robust
Tree-Based Techniques: Extra
Tree, Random Forest, GBoost, and LightGBM |
title_full_unstemmed | Modeling Viscosity
of CO(2)–N(2) Gaseous Mixtures Using Robust
Tree-Based Techniques: Extra
Tree, Random Forest, GBoost, and LightGBM |
title_short | Modeling Viscosity
of CO(2)–N(2) Gaseous Mixtures Using Robust
Tree-Based Techniques: Extra
Tree, Random Forest, GBoost, and LightGBM |
title_sort | modeling viscosity
of co(2)–n(2) gaseous mixtures using robust
tree-based techniques: extra
tree, random forest, gboost, and lightgbm |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10116627/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37091404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00228 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhenghaimin modelingviscosityofco2n2gaseousmixturesusingrobusttreebasedtechniquesextratreerandomforestgboostandlightgbm AT mahmoudzadehatena modelingviscosityofco2n2gaseousmixturesusingrobusttreebasedtechniquesextratreerandomforestgboostandlightgbm AT amiriramshehbehnam modelingviscosityofco2n2gaseousmixturesusingrobusttreebasedtechniquesextratreerandomforestgboostandlightgbm AT hemmatisarapardehabdolhossein modelingviscosityofco2n2gaseousmixturesusingrobusttreebasedtechniquesextratreerandomforestgboostandlightgbm |