Cargando…

Higher performance for women than men in MRI-based Alzheimer’s disease detection

INTRODUCTION: Although machine learning classifiers have been frequently used to detect Alzheimer’s disease (AD) based on structural brain MRI data, potential bias with respect to sex and age has not yet been addressed. Here, we examine a state-of-the-art AD classifier for potential sex and age bias...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klingenberg, Malte, Stark, Didem, Eitel, Fabian, Budding, Céline, Habes, Mohamad, Ritter, Kerstin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10116672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37081528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-023-01225-6
_version_ 1785028476846211072
author Klingenberg, Malte
Stark, Didem
Eitel, Fabian
Budding, Céline
Habes, Mohamad
Ritter, Kerstin
author_facet Klingenberg, Malte
Stark, Didem
Eitel, Fabian
Budding, Céline
Habes, Mohamad
Ritter, Kerstin
author_sort Klingenberg, Malte
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Although machine learning classifiers have been frequently used to detect Alzheimer’s disease (AD) based on structural brain MRI data, potential bias with respect to sex and age has not yet been addressed. Here, we examine a state-of-the-art AD classifier for potential sex and age bias even in the case of balanced training data. METHODS: Based on an age- and sex-balanced cohort of 432 subjects (306 healthy controls, 126 subjects with AD) extracted from the ADNI data base, we trained a convolutional neural network to detect AD in MRI brain scans and performed ten different random training-validation-test splits to increase robustness of the results. Classifier decisions for single subjects were explained using layer-wise relevance propagation. RESULTS: The classifier performed significantly better for women (balanced accuracy [Formula: see text] ) than for men ([Formula: see text] ). No significant differences were found in clinical AD scores, ruling out a disparity in disease severity as a cause for the performance difference. Analysis of the explanations revealed a larger variance in regional brain areas for male subjects compared to female subjects. DISCUSSION: The identified sex differences cannot be attributed to an imbalanced training dataset and therefore point to the importance of examining and reporting classifier performance across population subgroups to increase transparency and algorithmic fairness. Collecting more data especially among underrepresented subgroups and balancing the dataset are important but do not always guarantee a fair outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10116672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101166722023-04-21 Higher performance for women than men in MRI-based Alzheimer’s disease detection Klingenberg, Malte Stark, Didem Eitel, Fabian Budding, Céline Habes, Mohamad Ritter, Kerstin Alzheimers Res Ther Research INTRODUCTION: Although machine learning classifiers have been frequently used to detect Alzheimer’s disease (AD) based on structural brain MRI data, potential bias with respect to sex and age has not yet been addressed. Here, we examine a state-of-the-art AD classifier for potential sex and age bias even in the case of balanced training data. METHODS: Based on an age- and sex-balanced cohort of 432 subjects (306 healthy controls, 126 subjects with AD) extracted from the ADNI data base, we trained a convolutional neural network to detect AD in MRI brain scans and performed ten different random training-validation-test splits to increase robustness of the results. Classifier decisions for single subjects were explained using layer-wise relevance propagation. RESULTS: The classifier performed significantly better for women (balanced accuracy [Formula: see text] ) than for men ([Formula: see text] ). No significant differences were found in clinical AD scores, ruling out a disparity in disease severity as a cause for the performance difference. Analysis of the explanations revealed a larger variance in regional brain areas for male subjects compared to female subjects. DISCUSSION: The identified sex differences cannot be attributed to an imbalanced training dataset and therefore point to the importance of examining and reporting classifier performance across population subgroups to increase transparency and algorithmic fairness. Collecting more data especially among underrepresented subgroups and balancing the dataset are important but do not always guarantee a fair outcome. BioMed Central 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10116672/ /pubmed/37081528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-023-01225-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Klingenberg, Malte
Stark, Didem
Eitel, Fabian
Budding, Céline
Habes, Mohamad
Ritter, Kerstin
Higher performance for women than men in MRI-based Alzheimer’s disease detection
title Higher performance for women than men in MRI-based Alzheimer’s disease detection
title_full Higher performance for women than men in MRI-based Alzheimer’s disease detection
title_fullStr Higher performance for women than men in MRI-based Alzheimer’s disease detection
title_full_unstemmed Higher performance for women than men in MRI-based Alzheimer’s disease detection
title_short Higher performance for women than men in MRI-based Alzheimer’s disease detection
title_sort higher performance for women than men in mri-based alzheimer’s disease detection
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10116672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37081528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13195-023-01225-6
work_keys_str_mv AT klingenbergmalte higherperformanceforwomenthanmeninmribasedalzheimersdiseasedetection
AT starkdidem higherperformanceforwomenthanmeninmribasedalzheimersdiseasedetection
AT eitelfabian higherperformanceforwomenthanmeninmribasedalzheimersdiseasedetection
AT buddingceline higherperformanceforwomenthanmeninmribasedalzheimersdiseasedetection
AT habesmohamad higherperformanceforwomenthanmeninmribasedalzheimersdiseasedetection
AT ritterkerstin higherperformanceforwomenthanmeninmribasedalzheimersdiseasedetection
AT higherperformanceforwomenthanmeninmribasedalzheimersdiseasedetection