Cargando…

Methane emissions from oil and gas production sites and their storage tanks in West Virginia

A measurement campaign characterized methane and other emissions from 15 natural gas production sites. Sites were surveyed using optical gas imaging (OGI) cameras to identify fugitive and vented emissions, with the methane mass emission rate quantified using a full flow sampler. We present storage t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Derek, Clark, Nigel, Heltzel, Robert, Darzi, Mahdi, Footer, Tracey L., Herndon, Scott, Thoma, Eben D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10116818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37091901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2022.100193
_version_ 1785145842221449216
author Johnson, Derek
Clark, Nigel
Heltzel, Robert
Darzi, Mahdi
Footer, Tracey L.
Herndon, Scott
Thoma, Eben D.
author_facet Johnson, Derek
Clark, Nigel
Heltzel, Robert
Darzi, Mahdi
Footer, Tracey L.
Herndon, Scott
Thoma, Eben D.
author_sort Johnson, Derek
collection PubMed
description A measurement campaign characterized methane and other emissions from 15 natural gas production sites. Sites were surveyed using optical gas imaging (OGI) cameras to identify fugitive and vented emissions, with the methane mass emission rate quantified using a full flow sampler. We present storage tank emissions in context of all site emissions, followed by a detailed account of the former. In total, 224 well pad emission sources at 15 sites were quantified yielding a total emission rate of 57.5 ± 2.89 kg/hr for all sites. Site specific emissions ranged from 0.4 to 10.5 kg/hr with arithmetic and geometric means of 3.8 and 2.2 kg/hr, respectively. The two largest categories of emissions by mass were pneumatic devices (35 kg/hr or ~61% of total) and tanks (14.3 kg/hr or ~25% of total). Produced water and condensate tanks at all sites employed emissions control devices. Nevertheless, tanks may still lose gas via component leaks as observed in this study. The total number of tanks at all sites was 153. One site experienced a major malfunction and direct tank measurements were not conducted due to safety concerns and may have represented a super-emitter as found in other studies. The remaining sites had 143 tanks, which accounted for 42 emissions sources. Leaks on controlled tanks were associated with ERVs, PRVs, and thief hatches. Since measurements represented snapshots-in-time and could only be compared with modeled tank emission data, it was difficult to assess real capture efficiencies accurately. Our estimates suggest that capture efficiency ranged from 63 to 92% for controlled tanks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10116818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101168182023-12-01 Methane emissions from oil and gas production sites and their storage tanks in West Virginia Johnson, Derek Clark, Nigel Heltzel, Robert Darzi, Mahdi Footer, Tracey L. Herndon, Scott Thoma, Eben D. Atmos Environ X Article A measurement campaign characterized methane and other emissions from 15 natural gas production sites. Sites were surveyed using optical gas imaging (OGI) cameras to identify fugitive and vented emissions, with the methane mass emission rate quantified using a full flow sampler. We present storage tank emissions in context of all site emissions, followed by a detailed account of the former. In total, 224 well pad emission sources at 15 sites were quantified yielding a total emission rate of 57.5 ± 2.89 kg/hr for all sites. Site specific emissions ranged from 0.4 to 10.5 kg/hr with arithmetic and geometric means of 3.8 and 2.2 kg/hr, respectively. The two largest categories of emissions by mass were pneumatic devices (35 kg/hr or ~61% of total) and tanks (14.3 kg/hr or ~25% of total). Produced water and condensate tanks at all sites employed emissions control devices. Nevertheless, tanks may still lose gas via component leaks as observed in this study. The total number of tanks at all sites was 153. One site experienced a major malfunction and direct tank measurements were not conducted due to safety concerns and may have represented a super-emitter as found in other studies. The remaining sites had 143 tanks, which accounted for 42 emissions sources. Leaks on controlled tanks were associated with ERVs, PRVs, and thief hatches. Since measurements represented snapshots-in-time and could only be compared with modeled tank emission data, it was difficult to assess real capture efficiencies accurately. Our estimates suggest that capture efficiency ranged from 63 to 92% for controlled tanks. 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10116818/ /pubmed/37091901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2022.100193 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Johnson, Derek
Clark, Nigel
Heltzel, Robert
Darzi, Mahdi
Footer, Tracey L.
Herndon, Scott
Thoma, Eben D.
Methane emissions from oil and gas production sites and their storage tanks in West Virginia
title Methane emissions from oil and gas production sites and their storage tanks in West Virginia
title_full Methane emissions from oil and gas production sites and their storage tanks in West Virginia
title_fullStr Methane emissions from oil and gas production sites and their storage tanks in West Virginia
title_full_unstemmed Methane emissions from oil and gas production sites and their storage tanks in West Virginia
title_short Methane emissions from oil and gas production sites and their storage tanks in West Virginia
title_sort methane emissions from oil and gas production sites and their storage tanks in west virginia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10116818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37091901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2022.100193
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonderek methaneemissionsfromoilandgasproductionsitesandtheirstoragetanksinwestvirginia
AT clarknigel methaneemissionsfromoilandgasproductionsitesandtheirstoragetanksinwestvirginia
AT heltzelrobert methaneemissionsfromoilandgasproductionsitesandtheirstoragetanksinwestvirginia
AT darzimahdi methaneemissionsfromoilandgasproductionsitesandtheirstoragetanksinwestvirginia
AT footertraceyl methaneemissionsfromoilandgasproductionsitesandtheirstoragetanksinwestvirginia
AT herndonscott methaneemissionsfromoilandgasproductionsitesandtheirstoragetanksinwestvirginia
AT thomaebend methaneemissionsfromoilandgasproductionsitesandtheirstoragetanksinwestvirginia