Cargando…

Increasing Undergraduate Student Knowledge about Journal Peer Review Using Outside Reading and In-Class Discussion

Peer review is an important part of the scientific publishing process that serves as a key quality control step. Learning that scientific publications go through peer review builds scientific literacy and may increase trust in published findings. Though the publication and peer review process is an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Barry, Rachael M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10117125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37089232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00156-22
_version_ 1785028562373312512
author Barry, Rachael M.
author_facet Barry, Rachael M.
author_sort Barry, Rachael M.
collection PubMed
description Peer review is an important part of the scientific publishing process that serves as a key quality control step. Learning that scientific publications go through peer review builds scientific literacy and may increase trust in published findings. Though the publication and peer review process is an established part of the practice of communicating science, this topic is not commonly taught at the undergraduate level, even in classes that regularly require students to read primary literature or author manuscripts. Often, undergraduate course lessons on peer review focus on the practice of performing peer review on other students’ writing rather than explaining how this process works for independent scientists publishing their novel work as primary literature articles. As a result, there is a need for more resources related to teaching about publication and peer review. This work presents a plan for out-of-class reading and an in-class lesson on peer review practices in biology. In this module, students learn the order of events in scientific publishing and consider the relationship between peer review and public trust in science by analyzing survey data. Students completing this activity reported knowledge gains related to scientific publishing and peer review and demonstrated their knowledge on an in-class assessment. Though this activity was developed for a biochemistry course, it may be implemented in various life sciences classes from introductory to advanced levels to improve student scientific literacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10117125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101171252023-04-21 Increasing Undergraduate Student Knowledge about Journal Peer Review Using Outside Reading and In-Class Discussion Barry, Rachael M. J Microbiol Biol Educ Tips and Tools Peer review is an important part of the scientific publishing process that serves as a key quality control step. Learning that scientific publications go through peer review builds scientific literacy and may increase trust in published findings. Though the publication and peer review process is an established part of the practice of communicating science, this topic is not commonly taught at the undergraduate level, even in classes that regularly require students to read primary literature or author manuscripts. Often, undergraduate course lessons on peer review focus on the practice of performing peer review on other students’ writing rather than explaining how this process works for independent scientists publishing their novel work as primary literature articles. As a result, there is a need for more resources related to teaching about publication and peer review. This work presents a plan for out-of-class reading and an in-class lesson on peer review practices in biology. In this module, students learn the order of events in scientific publishing and consider the relationship between peer review and public trust in science by analyzing survey data. Students completing this activity reported knowledge gains related to scientific publishing and peer review and demonstrated their knowledge on an in-class assessment. Though this activity was developed for a biochemistry course, it may be implemented in various life sciences classes from introductory to advanced levels to improve student scientific literacy. American Society for Microbiology 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10117125/ /pubmed/37089232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00156-22 Text en Copyright © 2023 Barry. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Tips and Tools
Barry, Rachael M.
Increasing Undergraduate Student Knowledge about Journal Peer Review Using Outside Reading and In-Class Discussion
title Increasing Undergraduate Student Knowledge about Journal Peer Review Using Outside Reading and In-Class Discussion
title_full Increasing Undergraduate Student Knowledge about Journal Peer Review Using Outside Reading and In-Class Discussion
title_fullStr Increasing Undergraduate Student Knowledge about Journal Peer Review Using Outside Reading and In-Class Discussion
title_full_unstemmed Increasing Undergraduate Student Knowledge about Journal Peer Review Using Outside Reading and In-Class Discussion
title_short Increasing Undergraduate Student Knowledge about Journal Peer Review Using Outside Reading and In-Class Discussion
title_sort increasing undergraduate student knowledge about journal peer review using outside reading and in-class discussion
topic Tips and Tools
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10117125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37089232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00156-22
work_keys_str_mv AT barryrachaelm increasingundergraduatestudentknowledgeaboutjournalpeerreviewusingoutsidereadingandinclassdiscussion