Cargando…

What multiplexing means for the interpretation of functional MRI data

Despite technology advances that have enabled routine acquisition of functional MRI data with sub-millimeter resolution, the inferences that cognitive neuroscientists must make to link fMRI data to behavior are complicated. Thus, a single dataset subjected to different analyses can be interpreted in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Olman, Cheryl A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10117671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37091812
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1134811
_version_ 1785028642026291200
author Olman, Cheryl A.
author_facet Olman, Cheryl A.
author_sort Olman, Cheryl A.
collection PubMed
description Despite technology advances that have enabled routine acquisition of functional MRI data with sub-millimeter resolution, the inferences that cognitive neuroscientists must make to link fMRI data to behavior are complicated. Thus, a single dataset subjected to different analyses can be interpreted in different ways. This article presents two optical analogies that can be useful for framing fMRI analyses in a way that allows for multiple interpretations of fMRI data to be valid simultaneously without undermining each other. The first is reflection: when an object is reflected in a mirrored surface, it appears as if the reflected object is sharing space with the mirrored object, but of course it is not. This analogy can be a good guide for interpreting the fMRI signal, since even at sub-millimeter resolutions the signal is determined by a mixture of local and long-range neural computations. The second is refraction. If we view an object through a multi-faceted prism or gemstone, our view will change–sometimes dramatically–depending on our viewing angle. In the same way, interpretation of fMRI data (inference of underlying neuronal activity) can and should be different depending on the analysis approach. Rather than representing a weakness of the methodology, or the superiority of one approach over the other (for example, simple regression analysis versus multi-voxel pattern analysis), this is an expected consequence of how information is multiplexed in the neural networks of the brain: multiple streams of information are simultaneously present in each location. The fact that any one analysis typically shows only one view of the data also puts some parentheses around fMRI practitioners’ constant search for ground truth against which to compare their data. By holding our interpretations lightly and understanding that many interpretations of the data can all be true at the same time, we do a better job of preparing ourselves to appreciate, and eventually understand, the complexity of the brain and the behavior it produces.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10117671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101176712023-04-21 What multiplexing means for the interpretation of functional MRI data Olman, Cheryl A. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Despite technology advances that have enabled routine acquisition of functional MRI data with sub-millimeter resolution, the inferences that cognitive neuroscientists must make to link fMRI data to behavior are complicated. Thus, a single dataset subjected to different analyses can be interpreted in different ways. This article presents two optical analogies that can be useful for framing fMRI analyses in a way that allows for multiple interpretations of fMRI data to be valid simultaneously without undermining each other. The first is reflection: when an object is reflected in a mirrored surface, it appears as if the reflected object is sharing space with the mirrored object, but of course it is not. This analogy can be a good guide for interpreting the fMRI signal, since even at sub-millimeter resolutions the signal is determined by a mixture of local and long-range neural computations. The second is refraction. If we view an object through a multi-faceted prism or gemstone, our view will change–sometimes dramatically–depending on our viewing angle. In the same way, interpretation of fMRI data (inference of underlying neuronal activity) can and should be different depending on the analysis approach. Rather than representing a weakness of the methodology, or the superiority of one approach over the other (for example, simple regression analysis versus multi-voxel pattern analysis), this is an expected consequence of how information is multiplexed in the neural networks of the brain: multiple streams of information are simultaneously present in each location. The fact that any one analysis typically shows only one view of the data also puts some parentheses around fMRI practitioners’ constant search for ground truth against which to compare their data. By holding our interpretations lightly and understanding that many interpretations of the data can all be true at the same time, we do a better job of preparing ourselves to appreciate, and eventually understand, the complexity of the brain and the behavior it produces. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10117671/ /pubmed/37091812 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1134811 Text en Copyright © 2023 Olman. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Olman, Cheryl A.
What multiplexing means for the interpretation of functional MRI data
title What multiplexing means for the interpretation of functional MRI data
title_full What multiplexing means for the interpretation of functional MRI data
title_fullStr What multiplexing means for the interpretation of functional MRI data
title_full_unstemmed What multiplexing means for the interpretation of functional MRI data
title_short What multiplexing means for the interpretation of functional MRI data
title_sort what multiplexing means for the interpretation of functional mri data
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10117671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37091812
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1134811
work_keys_str_mv AT olmancheryla whatmultiplexingmeansfortheinterpretationoffunctionalmridata