Cargando…

Stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: Results of a single-arm monocenter Phase-II trial

INTRODUCTION: Since radical treatments in low risk prostate cancer do not improve overall survival in comparison to active surveillance, preserving quality of life (QOL) remains the key objective. Active surveillance of indolent prostate cancer avoids curative treatment side-effects but necessitates...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Paul V., Donneaux, Bertrand, Louis, Céline, Bodgal, Zsuzsa, Philippi, Sven, Biver, Sylvie, Frederick, Bérangère, Harzé, Ludovic, Lasar, Yves, Vogin, Guillaume, Nickers, Philippe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10118035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37091187
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1143716
_version_ 1785028721383571456
author Nguyen, Paul V.
Donneaux, Bertrand
Louis, Céline
Bodgal, Zsuzsa
Philippi, Sven
Biver, Sylvie
Frederick, Bérangère
Harzé, Ludovic
Lasar, Yves
Vogin, Guillaume
Nickers, Philippe
author_facet Nguyen, Paul V.
Donneaux, Bertrand
Louis, Céline
Bodgal, Zsuzsa
Philippi, Sven
Biver, Sylvie
Frederick, Bérangère
Harzé, Ludovic
Lasar, Yves
Vogin, Guillaume
Nickers, Philippe
author_sort Nguyen, Paul V.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Since radical treatments in low risk prostate cancer do not improve overall survival in comparison to active surveillance, preserving quality of life (QOL) remains the key objective. Active surveillance of indolent prostate cancer avoids curative treatment side-effects but necessitates repeated biopsies. Focal stereotactic body radiation therapy (focal SBRT) may be an alternative. This non-randomized Phase-II trial examined the feasibility and safety of focal SBRT for low and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: Patients were recruited in 2016–2019 if they had: localized CAPRA ≤ 3 prostate adenocarcinoma; an isolated PIRADS≥4 macroscopic tumor on MRI; WHO Performance Status 0-1; and no major urinary symptoms. 36.25 Gy (80% isodose prescription) were delivered in 5 fractions every other day. Primary outcome was delay between focal SBRT and salvage-treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes were: acute/late genitourinary/rectal toxicity; biological, clinical and MRI local control; and change in QOL measures. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 36 months, salvage prostatectomy in the 24 eligible patients was never required. Three-year biochemical progression-free survival was 96%. The single biochemical recurrence was a small (2-mm) Gleason 6 (3 + 3) lesion in the non-irradiated lobe. All 19 patients with ≥1 post-treatment MRI evaluations demonstrated complete radiological response. Acute/late grade ≥3 toxicities did not occur: all acute toxicities were grade-1 genitourinary (38% patients), grade-2 genitourinary (8%), or grade-1 rectal (13%) toxicities. There was one (4%) late grade-1 genitourinary toxicity. QOL was unchanged at last follow-up, as shown by IPSS (2.86 to 3.29, p>0.05), U-QOL (0.71 to 0.67, p>0.05), and IIEF5 (the 14 initially potent patients maintained potency (IIEF5 > 16)). CONCLUSION: Focal SBRT is feasible, well-tolerated, and preserves QOL. This innovative robotized approach challenges active surveillance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10118035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101180352023-04-21 Stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: Results of a single-arm monocenter Phase-II trial Nguyen, Paul V. Donneaux, Bertrand Louis, Céline Bodgal, Zsuzsa Philippi, Sven Biver, Sylvie Frederick, Bérangère Harzé, Ludovic Lasar, Yves Vogin, Guillaume Nickers, Philippe Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: Since radical treatments in low risk prostate cancer do not improve overall survival in comparison to active surveillance, preserving quality of life (QOL) remains the key objective. Active surveillance of indolent prostate cancer avoids curative treatment side-effects but necessitates repeated biopsies. Focal stereotactic body radiation therapy (focal SBRT) may be an alternative. This non-randomized Phase-II trial examined the feasibility and safety of focal SBRT for low and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: Patients were recruited in 2016–2019 if they had: localized CAPRA ≤ 3 prostate adenocarcinoma; an isolated PIRADS≥4 macroscopic tumor on MRI; WHO Performance Status 0-1; and no major urinary symptoms. 36.25 Gy (80% isodose prescription) were delivered in 5 fractions every other day. Primary outcome was delay between focal SBRT and salvage-treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes were: acute/late genitourinary/rectal toxicity; biological, clinical and MRI local control; and change in QOL measures. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 36 months, salvage prostatectomy in the 24 eligible patients was never required. Three-year biochemical progression-free survival was 96%. The single biochemical recurrence was a small (2-mm) Gleason 6 (3 + 3) lesion in the non-irradiated lobe. All 19 patients with ≥1 post-treatment MRI evaluations demonstrated complete radiological response. Acute/late grade ≥3 toxicities did not occur: all acute toxicities were grade-1 genitourinary (38% patients), grade-2 genitourinary (8%), or grade-1 rectal (13%) toxicities. There was one (4%) late grade-1 genitourinary toxicity. QOL was unchanged at last follow-up, as shown by IPSS (2.86 to 3.29, p>0.05), U-QOL (0.71 to 0.67, p>0.05), and IIEF5 (the 14 initially potent patients maintained potency (IIEF5 > 16)). CONCLUSION: Focal SBRT is feasible, well-tolerated, and preserves QOL. This innovative robotized approach challenges active surveillance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10118035/ /pubmed/37091187 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1143716 Text en Copyright © 2023 Nguyen, Donneaux, Louis, Bodgal, Philippi, Biver, Frederick, Harzé, Lasar, Vogin and Nickers https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Nguyen, Paul V.
Donneaux, Bertrand
Louis, Céline
Bodgal, Zsuzsa
Philippi, Sven
Biver, Sylvie
Frederick, Bérangère
Harzé, Ludovic
Lasar, Yves
Vogin, Guillaume
Nickers, Philippe
Stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: Results of a single-arm monocenter Phase-II trial
title Stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: Results of a single-arm monocenter Phase-II trial
title_full Stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: Results of a single-arm monocenter Phase-II trial
title_fullStr Stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: Results of a single-arm monocenter Phase-II trial
title_full_unstemmed Stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: Results of a single-arm monocenter Phase-II trial
title_short Stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: Results of a single-arm monocenter Phase-II trial
title_sort stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: results of a single-arm monocenter phase-ii trial
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10118035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37091187
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1143716
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenpaulv stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial
AT donneauxbertrand stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial
AT louisceline stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial
AT bodgalzsuzsa stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial
AT philippisven stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial
AT biversylvie stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial
AT frederickberangere stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial
AT harzeludovic stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial
AT lasaryves stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial
AT voginguillaume stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial
AT nickersphilippe stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial