Cargando…
Stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: Results of a single-arm monocenter Phase-II trial
INTRODUCTION: Since radical treatments in low risk prostate cancer do not improve overall survival in comparison to active surveillance, preserving quality of life (QOL) remains the key objective. Active surveillance of indolent prostate cancer avoids curative treatment side-effects but necessitates...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10118035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37091187 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1143716 |
_version_ | 1785028721383571456 |
---|---|
author | Nguyen, Paul V. Donneaux, Bertrand Louis, Céline Bodgal, Zsuzsa Philippi, Sven Biver, Sylvie Frederick, Bérangère Harzé, Ludovic Lasar, Yves Vogin, Guillaume Nickers, Philippe |
author_facet | Nguyen, Paul V. Donneaux, Bertrand Louis, Céline Bodgal, Zsuzsa Philippi, Sven Biver, Sylvie Frederick, Bérangère Harzé, Ludovic Lasar, Yves Vogin, Guillaume Nickers, Philippe |
author_sort | Nguyen, Paul V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Since radical treatments in low risk prostate cancer do not improve overall survival in comparison to active surveillance, preserving quality of life (QOL) remains the key objective. Active surveillance of indolent prostate cancer avoids curative treatment side-effects but necessitates repeated biopsies. Focal stereotactic body radiation therapy (focal SBRT) may be an alternative. This non-randomized Phase-II trial examined the feasibility and safety of focal SBRT for low and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: Patients were recruited in 2016–2019 if they had: localized CAPRA ≤ 3 prostate adenocarcinoma; an isolated PIRADS≥4 macroscopic tumor on MRI; WHO Performance Status 0-1; and no major urinary symptoms. 36.25 Gy (80% isodose prescription) were delivered in 5 fractions every other day. Primary outcome was delay between focal SBRT and salvage-treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes were: acute/late genitourinary/rectal toxicity; biological, clinical and MRI local control; and change in QOL measures. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 36 months, salvage prostatectomy in the 24 eligible patients was never required. Three-year biochemical progression-free survival was 96%. The single biochemical recurrence was a small (2-mm) Gleason 6 (3 + 3) lesion in the non-irradiated lobe. All 19 patients with ≥1 post-treatment MRI evaluations demonstrated complete radiological response. Acute/late grade ≥3 toxicities did not occur: all acute toxicities were grade-1 genitourinary (38% patients), grade-2 genitourinary (8%), or grade-1 rectal (13%) toxicities. There was one (4%) late grade-1 genitourinary toxicity. QOL was unchanged at last follow-up, as shown by IPSS (2.86 to 3.29, p>0.05), U-QOL (0.71 to 0.67, p>0.05), and IIEF5 (the 14 initially potent patients maintained potency (IIEF5 > 16)). CONCLUSION: Focal SBRT is feasible, well-tolerated, and preserves QOL. This innovative robotized approach challenges active surveillance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10118035 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101180352023-04-21 Stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: Results of a single-arm monocenter Phase-II trial Nguyen, Paul V. Donneaux, Bertrand Louis, Céline Bodgal, Zsuzsa Philippi, Sven Biver, Sylvie Frederick, Bérangère Harzé, Ludovic Lasar, Yves Vogin, Guillaume Nickers, Philippe Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: Since radical treatments in low risk prostate cancer do not improve overall survival in comparison to active surveillance, preserving quality of life (QOL) remains the key objective. Active surveillance of indolent prostate cancer avoids curative treatment side-effects but necessitates repeated biopsies. Focal stereotactic body radiation therapy (focal SBRT) may be an alternative. This non-randomized Phase-II trial examined the feasibility and safety of focal SBRT for low and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: Patients were recruited in 2016–2019 if they had: localized CAPRA ≤ 3 prostate adenocarcinoma; an isolated PIRADS≥4 macroscopic tumor on MRI; WHO Performance Status 0-1; and no major urinary symptoms. 36.25 Gy (80% isodose prescription) were delivered in 5 fractions every other day. Primary outcome was delay between focal SBRT and salvage-treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes were: acute/late genitourinary/rectal toxicity; biological, clinical and MRI local control; and change in QOL measures. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 36 months, salvage prostatectomy in the 24 eligible patients was never required. Three-year biochemical progression-free survival was 96%. The single biochemical recurrence was a small (2-mm) Gleason 6 (3 + 3) lesion in the non-irradiated lobe. All 19 patients with ≥1 post-treatment MRI evaluations demonstrated complete radiological response. Acute/late grade ≥3 toxicities did not occur: all acute toxicities were grade-1 genitourinary (38% patients), grade-2 genitourinary (8%), or grade-1 rectal (13%) toxicities. There was one (4%) late grade-1 genitourinary toxicity. QOL was unchanged at last follow-up, as shown by IPSS (2.86 to 3.29, p>0.05), U-QOL (0.71 to 0.67, p>0.05), and IIEF5 (the 14 initially potent patients maintained potency (IIEF5 > 16)). CONCLUSION: Focal SBRT is feasible, well-tolerated, and preserves QOL. This innovative robotized approach challenges active surveillance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10118035/ /pubmed/37091187 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1143716 Text en Copyright © 2023 Nguyen, Donneaux, Louis, Bodgal, Philippi, Biver, Frederick, Harzé, Lasar, Vogin and Nickers https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Nguyen, Paul V. Donneaux, Bertrand Louis, Céline Bodgal, Zsuzsa Philippi, Sven Biver, Sylvie Frederick, Bérangère Harzé, Ludovic Lasar, Yves Vogin, Guillaume Nickers, Philippe Stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: Results of a single-arm monocenter Phase-II trial |
title | Stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: Results of a single-arm monocenter Phase-II trial |
title_full | Stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: Results of a single-arm monocenter Phase-II trial |
title_fullStr | Stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: Results of a single-arm monocenter Phase-II trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: Results of a single-arm monocenter Phase-II trial |
title_short | Stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: Results of a single-arm monocenter Phase-II trial |
title_sort | stereotactic focal radiotherapy as an alternative treatment for low-risk prostate cancer: results of a single-arm monocenter phase-ii trial |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10118035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37091187 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1143716 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nguyenpaulv stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial AT donneauxbertrand stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial AT louisceline stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial AT bodgalzsuzsa stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial AT philippisven stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial AT biversylvie stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial AT frederickberangere stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial AT harzeludovic stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial AT lasaryves stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial AT voginguillaume stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial AT nickersphilippe stereotacticfocalradiotherapyasanalternativetreatmentforlowriskprostatecancerresultsofasinglearmmonocenterphaseiitrial |