Cargando…

The effectiveness of post-processing head and neck CT angiography using contrast enhancement boost technique

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the potential of contrast enhancement (CE)-boost technique in the head and neck computed tomography (CT) angiography in terms of the objective and subjective image quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent head and neck...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Otgonbaatar, Chuluunbaatar, Jeon, Pil-Hyun, Ryu, Jae-Kyun, Shim, Hackjoon, Jeon, Sang-Hyun, Ko, Sung Min, Kim, Hyunjung, Kim, Jin Woo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10118076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37079597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284793
_version_ 1785028728413224960
author Otgonbaatar, Chuluunbaatar
Jeon, Pil-Hyun
Ryu, Jae-Kyun
Shim, Hackjoon
Jeon, Sang-Hyun
Ko, Sung Min
Kim, Hyunjung
Kim, Jin Woo
author_facet Otgonbaatar, Chuluunbaatar
Jeon, Pil-Hyun
Ryu, Jae-Kyun
Shim, Hackjoon
Jeon, Sang-Hyun
Ko, Sung Min
Kim, Hyunjung
Kim, Jin Woo
author_sort Otgonbaatar, Chuluunbaatar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the potential of contrast enhancement (CE)-boost technique in the head and neck computed tomography (CT) angiography in terms of the objective and subjective image quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent head and neck CT angiography between May 2022 and July 2022 were included. The CE-boost images were generated by combining the subtracted iodinated image and contrast-enhanced image. The objective image analysis was compared for each image with and without CE-boost technique using the CT attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR), and image sharpness (full width at half width maximum, FWHM). The subjective image analysis was evaluated by two independent experienced radiologists in the following aspects: the overall image quality, motion artifact, vascular delineation, and vessel sharpness. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients (mean age, 59.48 ± 13.71 years; range, 24–87 years; 36 women) were included. The CT attenuation of the vertebrobasilar arteries was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in the images obtained using CE-boost technique than in conventional images. Image noise was significantly (p < 0.001) lower for CE-boost images (6.09 ± 1.93) than for conventional images (7.79 ± 1.73). Moreover, CE-boost technique yielded higher SNR (64.43 ± 17.17 vs. 121.37 ± 38.77, p < 0.001) and CNR (56.90 ± 18.79 vs. 116.65 ± 57.44, p < 0.001) than conventional images. CE-boost resulted in shorter FWHM than conventional images (p < 0.001). Higher subjective image quality scores were also demonstrated by the CE-boost than images without CE-boost technique. CONCLUSIONS: In both objective and subjective image analysis, the CE-boost technique provided higher image quality without increasing the flow rate and concentration of contrast media in the head and neck CT angiography. Furthermore, the vessel completeness and delineation were superior in CE-boost images than in conventional images.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10118076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101180762023-04-21 The effectiveness of post-processing head and neck CT angiography using contrast enhancement boost technique Otgonbaatar, Chuluunbaatar Jeon, Pil-Hyun Ryu, Jae-Kyun Shim, Hackjoon Jeon, Sang-Hyun Ko, Sung Min Kim, Hyunjung Kim, Jin Woo PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the potential of contrast enhancement (CE)-boost technique in the head and neck computed tomography (CT) angiography in terms of the objective and subjective image quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent head and neck CT angiography between May 2022 and July 2022 were included. The CE-boost images were generated by combining the subtracted iodinated image and contrast-enhanced image. The objective image analysis was compared for each image with and without CE-boost technique using the CT attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR), and image sharpness (full width at half width maximum, FWHM). The subjective image analysis was evaluated by two independent experienced radiologists in the following aspects: the overall image quality, motion artifact, vascular delineation, and vessel sharpness. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients (mean age, 59.48 ± 13.71 years; range, 24–87 years; 36 women) were included. The CT attenuation of the vertebrobasilar arteries was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in the images obtained using CE-boost technique than in conventional images. Image noise was significantly (p < 0.001) lower for CE-boost images (6.09 ± 1.93) than for conventional images (7.79 ± 1.73). Moreover, CE-boost technique yielded higher SNR (64.43 ± 17.17 vs. 121.37 ± 38.77, p < 0.001) and CNR (56.90 ± 18.79 vs. 116.65 ± 57.44, p < 0.001) than conventional images. CE-boost resulted in shorter FWHM than conventional images (p < 0.001). Higher subjective image quality scores were also demonstrated by the CE-boost than images without CE-boost technique. CONCLUSIONS: In both objective and subjective image analysis, the CE-boost technique provided higher image quality without increasing the flow rate and concentration of contrast media in the head and neck CT angiography. Furthermore, the vessel completeness and delineation were superior in CE-boost images than in conventional images. Public Library of Science 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10118076/ /pubmed/37079597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284793 Text en © 2023 Otgonbaatar et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Otgonbaatar, Chuluunbaatar
Jeon, Pil-Hyun
Ryu, Jae-Kyun
Shim, Hackjoon
Jeon, Sang-Hyun
Ko, Sung Min
Kim, Hyunjung
Kim, Jin Woo
The effectiveness of post-processing head and neck CT angiography using contrast enhancement boost technique
title The effectiveness of post-processing head and neck CT angiography using contrast enhancement boost technique
title_full The effectiveness of post-processing head and neck CT angiography using contrast enhancement boost technique
title_fullStr The effectiveness of post-processing head and neck CT angiography using contrast enhancement boost technique
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of post-processing head and neck CT angiography using contrast enhancement boost technique
title_short The effectiveness of post-processing head and neck CT angiography using contrast enhancement boost technique
title_sort effectiveness of post-processing head and neck ct angiography using contrast enhancement boost technique
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10118076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37079597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284793
work_keys_str_mv AT otgonbaatarchuluunbaatar theeffectivenessofpostprocessingheadandneckctangiographyusingcontrastenhancementboosttechnique
AT jeonpilhyun theeffectivenessofpostprocessingheadandneckctangiographyusingcontrastenhancementboosttechnique
AT ryujaekyun theeffectivenessofpostprocessingheadandneckctangiographyusingcontrastenhancementboosttechnique
AT shimhackjoon theeffectivenessofpostprocessingheadandneckctangiographyusingcontrastenhancementboosttechnique
AT jeonsanghyun theeffectivenessofpostprocessingheadandneckctangiographyusingcontrastenhancementboosttechnique
AT kosungmin theeffectivenessofpostprocessingheadandneckctangiographyusingcontrastenhancementboosttechnique
AT kimhyunjung theeffectivenessofpostprocessingheadandneckctangiographyusingcontrastenhancementboosttechnique
AT kimjinwoo theeffectivenessofpostprocessingheadandneckctangiographyusingcontrastenhancementboosttechnique
AT otgonbaatarchuluunbaatar effectivenessofpostprocessingheadandneckctangiographyusingcontrastenhancementboosttechnique
AT jeonpilhyun effectivenessofpostprocessingheadandneckctangiographyusingcontrastenhancementboosttechnique
AT ryujaekyun effectivenessofpostprocessingheadandneckctangiographyusingcontrastenhancementboosttechnique
AT shimhackjoon effectivenessofpostprocessingheadandneckctangiographyusingcontrastenhancementboosttechnique
AT jeonsanghyun effectivenessofpostprocessingheadandneckctangiographyusingcontrastenhancementboosttechnique
AT kosungmin effectivenessofpostprocessingheadandneckctangiographyusingcontrastenhancementboosttechnique
AT kimhyunjung effectivenessofpostprocessingheadandneckctangiographyusingcontrastenhancementboosttechnique
AT kimjinwoo effectivenessofpostprocessingheadandneckctangiographyusingcontrastenhancementboosttechnique