Cargando…

Prenatal screening tests and prevalence of fetal aneuploidies in a tertiary hospital in Thailand

This study evaluated prenatal screening test performance and the prevalence of common aneuploidies at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand. We collected data from screening tests which are first-trimester test, quadruple test, and noninvasive prenatal tests (NIPT) between January 2016 and December 2020. Thirt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wongkrajang, Preechaya, Jittikoon, Jiraphun, Sangroongruangsri, Sermsiri, Talungchit, Pattarawalai, Ruangvutilert, Pornpimol, Panchalee, Tachjaree, Chaikledkaew, Usa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10118185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37079630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284829
_version_ 1785028755052298240
author Wongkrajang, Preechaya
Jittikoon, Jiraphun
Sangroongruangsri, Sermsiri
Talungchit, Pattarawalai
Ruangvutilert, Pornpimol
Panchalee, Tachjaree
Chaikledkaew, Usa
author_facet Wongkrajang, Preechaya
Jittikoon, Jiraphun
Sangroongruangsri, Sermsiri
Talungchit, Pattarawalai
Ruangvutilert, Pornpimol
Panchalee, Tachjaree
Chaikledkaew, Usa
author_sort Wongkrajang, Preechaya
collection PubMed
description This study evaluated prenatal screening test performance and the prevalence of common aneuploidies at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand. We collected data from screening tests which are first-trimester test, quadruple test, and noninvasive prenatal tests (NIPT) between January 2016 and December 2020. Thirty percent (7,860/25,736) of pregnancies received prenatal screening tests for aneuploidies disorders, and 17.8% underwent prenatal diagnosis tests without screening. The highest percentage of screening tests was first-trimester test (64.5%). The high-risk results were 4% for first-trimester test, 6.6% for quadruple test, and 1.3% for NIPT. The serum screening tests for trisomy 13 and 18 had no true positives; therefore, we could not calculate sensitivity. For the first-trimester test, the sensitivity for trisomy 21 was 71.4% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 30.3–94.9); specificity for trisomy 13 and 18 was 99.9% (95% CI 99.8–99.9); and for trisomy 21 was 96.1% (95% CI 95.6–96.7). For the quadruple test, the specificity for trisomy 18 was 99.6% (95% CI 98.9–99.8), while the sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 21 were 50% (95% CI 26.7–97.3) and 93.9% (95% CI 92.2–95.3), respectively. NIPT had 100% sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 13, 18 and 21, and there were neither false negatives nor false positives. For pregnant women < 35 years, the prevalence of trisomy 13, 18, and 21 per 1,000 births was 0.28 (95% CI 0.12–0.67), 0.28 (95% CI 0.12–0.67), and 0.89 (95% CI 0.54–1.45), respectively. For pregnant women ≥35 years, the prevalence of trisomy 13, 18, and 21 per 1,000 births was 0.26 (95% CI 0.06–1.03), 2.59 (95% CI 1.67–4.01), and 7.25 (95% CI 5.58–9.41), respectively. For all pregnancies, the prevalence of trisomy 13, 18, and 21 per 1,000 births was 0.27 (95% CI 0.13–0.57), 0.97 (95% CI 0.66–1.44), 2.80 (95% CI 2.22–3.52), respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10118185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101181852023-04-21 Prenatal screening tests and prevalence of fetal aneuploidies in a tertiary hospital in Thailand Wongkrajang, Preechaya Jittikoon, Jiraphun Sangroongruangsri, Sermsiri Talungchit, Pattarawalai Ruangvutilert, Pornpimol Panchalee, Tachjaree Chaikledkaew, Usa PLoS One Research Article This study evaluated prenatal screening test performance and the prevalence of common aneuploidies at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand. We collected data from screening tests which are first-trimester test, quadruple test, and noninvasive prenatal tests (NIPT) between January 2016 and December 2020. Thirty percent (7,860/25,736) of pregnancies received prenatal screening tests for aneuploidies disorders, and 17.8% underwent prenatal diagnosis tests without screening. The highest percentage of screening tests was first-trimester test (64.5%). The high-risk results were 4% for first-trimester test, 6.6% for quadruple test, and 1.3% for NIPT. The serum screening tests for trisomy 13 and 18 had no true positives; therefore, we could not calculate sensitivity. For the first-trimester test, the sensitivity for trisomy 21 was 71.4% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 30.3–94.9); specificity for trisomy 13 and 18 was 99.9% (95% CI 99.8–99.9); and for trisomy 21 was 96.1% (95% CI 95.6–96.7). For the quadruple test, the specificity for trisomy 18 was 99.6% (95% CI 98.9–99.8), while the sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 21 were 50% (95% CI 26.7–97.3) and 93.9% (95% CI 92.2–95.3), respectively. NIPT had 100% sensitivity and specificity for trisomy 13, 18 and 21, and there were neither false negatives nor false positives. For pregnant women < 35 years, the prevalence of trisomy 13, 18, and 21 per 1,000 births was 0.28 (95% CI 0.12–0.67), 0.28 (95% CI 0.12–0.67), and 0.89 (95% CI 0.54–1.45), respectively. For pregnant women ≥35 years, the prevalence of trisomy 13, 18, and 21 per 1,000 births was 0.26 (95% CI 0.06–1.03), 2.59 (95% CI 1.67–4.01), and 7.25 (95% CI 5.58–9.41), respectively. For all pregnancies, the prevalence of trisomy 13, 18, and 21 per 1,000 births was 0.27 (95% CI 0.13–0.57), 0.97 (95% CI 0.66–1.44), 2.80 (95% CI 2.22–3.52), respectively. Public Library of Science 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10118185/ /pubmed/37079630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284829 Text en © 2023 Wongkrajang et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wongkrajang, Preechaya
Jittikoon, Jiraphun
Sangroongruangsri, Sermsiri
Talungchit, Pattarawalai
Ruangvutilert, Pornpimol
Panchalee, Tachjaree
Chaikledkaew, Usa
Prenatal screening tests and prevalence of fetal aneuploidies in a tertiary hospital in Thailand
title Prenatal screening tests and prevalence of fetal aneuploidies in a tertiary hospital in Thailand
title_full Prenatal screening tests and prevalence of fetal aneuploidies in a tertiary hospital in Thailand
title_fullStr Prenatal screening tests and prevalence of fetal aneuploidies in a tertiary hospital in Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Prenatal screening tests and prevalence of fetal aneuploidies in a tertiary hospital in Thailand
title_short Prenatal screening tests and prevalence of fetal aneuploidies in a tertiary hospital in Thailand
title_sort prenatal screening tests and prevalence of fetal aneuploidies in a tertiary hospital in thailand
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10118185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37079630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284829
work_keys_str_mv AT wongkrajangpreechaya prenatalscreeningtestsandprevalenceoffetalaneuploidiesinatertiaryhospitalinthailand
AT jittikoonjiraphun prenatalscreeningtestsandprevalenceoffetalaneuploidiesinatertiaryhospitalinthailand
AT sangroongruangsrisermsiri prenatalscreeningtestsandprevalenceoffetalaneuploidiesinatertiaryhospitalinthailand
AT talungchitpattarawalai prenatalscreeningtestsandprevalenceoffetalaneuploidiesinatertiaryhospitalinthailand
AT ruangvutilertpornpimol prenatalscreeningtestsandprevalenceoffetalaneuploidiesinatertiaryhospitalinthailand
AT panchaleetachjaree prenatalscreeningtestsandprevalenceoffetalaneuploidiesinatertiaryhospitalinthailand
AT chaikledkaewusa prenatalscreeningtestsandprevalenceoffetalaneuploidiesinatertiaryhospitalinthailand