Cargando…
Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)
Increasing digitization also raises concerns regarding the reliability and comprehensibility of online health information. In this study, we aimed to examine the readability, reliability, and quality of internet-based patient education materials on “transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.” On S...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10118348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37083809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033529 |
_version_ | 1785028788233437184 |
---|---|
author | Erkin, Yüksel Hanci, Volkan Ozduran, Erkan |
author_facet | Erkin, Yüksel Hanci, Volkan Ozduran, Erkan |
author_sort | Erkin, Yüksel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Increasing digitization also raises concerns regarding the reliability and comprehensibility of online health information. In this study, we aimed to examine the readability, reliability, and quality of internet-based patient education materials on “transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.” On September 15, 2022, we used Google search engine to search the keyword “Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation” and obtained information from 200 websites. The readability of the websites was evaluated using the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, and Gunning Fog. The Journal of American Medical Association score and Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct were used to determine the reliability of the websites, whereas the DISCERN score and Global Quality Score were used to evaluate the quality of the websites. In the readability analysis of 102 websites that met the inclusion criteria of this study, we found that the Flesch Reading Ease Score was 47.91 ± 13.79 (difficult), average Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook were 11.20 ± 2.85 and 10.53 ± 2.11 years, respectively, and average Gunning Fog score was 14.04 ± 2.74 (very difficult). Commercial websites constituted the highest proportion of websites (n = 36, 35.5%). Overall, 16.7% of the websites were found to be of high quality according to the Global Quality Score, 16 (15.7%) websites had Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct certification, and 8.8% of the websites were found to be highly reliable according to the Journal of American Medical Association scores. There was a statistically significant difference between website typologies and quality and reliability scores (P < .001). Compared with the sixth-grade level recommended by the American Medical Association and the National Institute of Health, the readability of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-related internet-based patient education materials was considerably high, but they showed low reliability and moderate-to-poor quality. Thus, the quality, reliability, and readability of websites developed by health professionals play a major role in conveying accurate and easily understandable information. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10118348 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101183482023-04-21 Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) Erkin, Yüksel Hanci, Volkan Ozduran, Erkan Medicine (Baltimore) 6300 Increasing digitization also raises concerns regarding the reliability and comprehensibility of online health information. In this study, we aimed to examine the readability, reliability, and quality of internet-based patient education materials on “transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.” On September 15, 2022, we used Google search engine to search the keyword “Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation” and obtained information from 200 websites. The readability of the websites was evaluated using the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, and Gunning Fog. The Journal of American Medical Association score and Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct were used to determine the reliability of the websites, whereas the DISCERN score and Global Quality Score were used to evaluate the quality of the websites. In the readability analysis of 102 websites that met the inclusion criteria of this study, we found that the Flesch Reading Ease Score was 47.91 ± 13.79 (difficult), average Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook were 11.20 ± 2.85 and 10.53 ± 2.11 years, respectively, and average Gunning Fog score was 14.04 ± 2.74 (very difficult). Commercial websites constituted the highest proportion of websites (n = 36, 35.5%). Overall, 16.7% of the websites were found to be of high quality according to the Global Quality Score, 16 (15.7%) websites had Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct certification, and 8.8% of the websites were found to be highly reliable according to the Journal of American Medical Association scores. There was a statistically significant difference between website typologies and quality and reliability scores (P < .001). Compared with the sixth-grade level recommended by the American Medical Association and the National Institute of Health, the readability of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-related internet-based patient education materials was considerably high, but they showed low reliability and moderate-to-poor quality. Thus, the quality, reliability, and readability of websites developed by health professionals play a major role in conveying accurate and easily understandable information. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10118348/ /pubmed/37083809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033529 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | 6300 Erkin, Yüksel Hanci, Volkan Ozduran, Erkan Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) |
title | Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) |
title_full | Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) |
title_short | Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) |
title_sort | evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (tens) |
topic | 6300 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10118348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37083809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033529 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT erkinyuksel evaluatingthereadabilityqualityandreliabilityofonlinepatienteducationmaterialsontranscutaneuouselectricalnervestimulationtens AT hancivolkan evaluatingthereadabilityqualityandreliabilityofonlinepatienteducationmaterialsontranscutaneuouselectricalnervestimulationtens AT ozduranerkan evaluatingthereadabilityqualityandreliabilityofonlinepatienteducationmaterialsontranscutaneuouselectricalnervestimulationtens |