Cargando…

Lean mass as a determinant of bone mineral density of proximal femur in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE: To verify which component of body composition (BC) has greater influence on postmenopausal women bone mineral density (BMD). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Four hundred and thirty women undergoing treatment for osteoporosis and 513 untreated women, except for calcium and vitamin D. Multiple linear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marin-Mio, Rosangela Villa, Moreira, Linda Denise Fernandes, Camargo, Marília, Périgo, Neide Alessandra Sansão, Cerondoglo, Maysa Seabra, Lazaretti-Castro, Marise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10118739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30304107
http://dx.doi.org/10.20945/2359-3997000000059
_version_ 1785028864911605760
author Marin-Mio, Rosangela Villa
Moreira, Linda Denise Fernandes
Camargo, Marília
Périgo, Neide Alessandra Sansão
Cerondoglo, Maysa Seabra
Lazaretti-Castro, Marise
author_facet Marin-Mio, Rosangela Villa
Moreira, Linda Denise Fernandes
Camargo, Marília
Périgo, Neide Alessandra Sansão
Cerondoglo, Maysa Seabra
Lazaretti-Castro, Marise
author_sort Marin-Mio, Rosangela Villa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To verify which component of body composition (BC) has greater influence on postmenopausal women bone mineral density (BMD). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Four hundred and thirty women undergoing treatment for osteoporosis and 513 untreated women, except for calcium and vitamin D. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed in order to correlated BMD at lumbar spine (LS), total femur (FT), femoral neck (FN) with body mass (BM), total lean mass (LM) and total fat mass (FM), all determined by DXA. RESULTS: BM significantly correlated with all bone sites in untreated and treated women (r = 0.420 vs 0.277 at LS; r = 0.490 vs 0.418 at FN, r = 0.496 vs 0.414 at FT, respectively). In untreated women, the LM correlated better than FM with all sites, explaining 179% of LS; 32.3% of FN and 30.2% of FT; whereas FM explained 13.2% of LS; 277% of FN, 23.4% of FT In treated women, correlations with BC were less relevant, with the LM explaining 6.7% of BMD at LS; 15.2% of FN, 16% of FT, whereas the FM explained 8.1% of LS; 179% of FN and 176% of FT. CONCLUSION: LM in untreated women was better predictor of BMD than FM, especialy for distal femur, where it explained more than 30% of the BMD, suggesting that maintaining a healthy muscle mass may contribute to decrease osteoporosis risk. Treatment with anti-osteoporotic drugs seems to mask these relationships. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2018;62(4):431-7
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10118739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101187392023-04-21 Lean mass as a determinant of bone mineral density of proximal femur in postmenopausal women Marin-Mio, Rosangela Villa Moreira, Linda Denise Fernandes Camargo, Marília Périgo, Neide Alessandra Sansão Cerondoglo, Maysa Seabra Lazaretti-Castro, Marise Arch Endocrinol Metab Original Article OBJECTIVE: To verify which component of body composition (BC) has greater influence on postmenopausal women bone mineral density (BMD). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Four hundred and thirty women undergoing treatment for osteoporosis and 513 untreated women, except for calcium and vitamin D. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed in order to correlated BMD at lumbar spine (LS), total femur (FT), femoral neck (FN) with body mass (BM), total lean mass (LM) and total fat mass (FM), all determined by DXA. RESULTS: BM significantly correlated with all bone sites in untreated and treated women (r = 0.420 vs 0.277 at LS; r = 0.490 vs 0.418 at FN, r = 0.496 vs 0.414 at FT, respectively). In untreated women, the LM correlated better than FM with all sites, explaining 179% of LS; 32.3% of FN and 30.2% of FT; whereas FM explained 13.2% of LS; 277% of FN, 23.4% of FT In treated women, correlations with BC were less relevant, with the LM explaining 6.7% of BMD at LS; 15.2% of FN, 16% of FT, whereas the FM explained 8.1% of LS; 179% of FN and 176% of FT. CONCLUSION: LM in untreated women was better predictor of BMD than FM, especialy for distal femur, where it explained more than 30% of the BMD, suggesting that maintaining a healthy muscle mass may contribute to decrease osteoporosis risk. Treatment with anti-osteoporotic drugs seems to mask these relationships. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2018;62(4):431-7 Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia 2018-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10118739/ /pubmed/30304107 http://dx.doi.org/10.20945/2359-3997000000059 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Marin-Mio, Rosangela Villa
Moreira, Linda Denise Fernandes
Camargo, Marília
Périgo, Neide Alessandra Sansão
Cerondoglo, Maysa Seabra
Lazaretti-Castro, Marise
Lean mass as a determinant of bone mineral density of proximal femur in postmenopausal women
title Lean mass as a determinant of bone mineral density of proximal femur in postmenopausal women
title_full Lean mass as a determinant of bone mineral density of proximal femur in postmenopausal women
title_fullStr Lean mass as a determinant of bone mineral density of proximal femur in postmenopausal women
title_full_unstemmed Lean mass as a determinant of bone mineral density of proximal femur in postmenopausal women
title_short Lean mass as a determinant of bone mineral density of proximal femur in postmenopausal women
title_sort lean mass as a determinant of bone mineral density of proximal femur in postmenopausal women
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10118739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30304107
http://dx.doi.org/10.20945/2359-3997000000059
work_keys_str_mv AT marinmiorosangelavilla leanmassasadeterminantofbonemineraldensityofproximalfemurinpostmenopausalwomen
AT moreiralindadenisefernandes leanmassasadeterminantofbonemineraldensityofproximalfemurinpostmenopausalwomen
AT camargomarilia leanmassasadeterminantofbonemineraldensityofproximalfemurinpostmenopausalwomen
AT perigoneidealessandrasansao leanmassasadeterminantofbonemineraldensityofproximalfemurinpostmenopausalwomen
AT cerondoglomaysaseabra leanmassasadeterminantofbonemineraldensityofproximalfemurinpostmenopausalwomen
AT lazaretticastromarise leanmassasadeterminantofbonemineraldensityofproximalfemurinpostmenopausalwomen