Cargando…

Diagnostic value of urinary luteinizing hormone levels in the monitoring of precocious puberty treatment

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether first-voided urinary LH (FV-ULH) – level measurement can adequately assess pubertal suppression as much as standard tests can. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study group included patients with central precocious puberty and rapidly progressing early puberty who received up...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yüce, Özge, Bideci, Aysun, Çelik, Nurullah, Çamurdan, Orhun, Cinaz, Peyami
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10118943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32236310
http://dx.doi.org/10.20945/2359-3997000000212
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To determine whether first-voided urinary LH (FV-ULH) – level measurement can adequately assess pubertal suppression as much as standard tests can. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study group included patients with central precocious puberty and rapidly progressing early puberty who received up to 3 – 4 doses of GnRHa therapy monthly and did not have adequate hormonal suppression after GnRH stimulation (90-minute LH level > 4 IU/L). Design: All of the participants underwent an LHRH test just after admission to the study. According to the stimulated peak LH levels, the patients were divided into 2 groups and followed until the end of the first year of treatment. The concordance between FV-ULH and stimulated LH levels was assessed. RESULTS: The FV-ULH levels in patients with inadequate hormonal suppression were significantly high compared to patients with adequate hormonal suppression. FV-ULH levels were very strongly correlated with stimulated LH levels (r = 0.91). Its correlation with basal LH levels was significant (r = 0.65). However, this positive correlation was modestly weakened after the first year of treatment. The cutoff value for FV-ULH of 1.01 mIU/mL had the highest sensitivity (92.3%) and specificity (100%). CONCLUSION: FV-ULH levels, using more reliable and sensitive assay methods, can be used to monitor the adequacy of GnRHa therapy.