Cargando…

Frequency of inter-specialty consensus decisions and adherence to advice following discussion at a weekly neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Data are limited on the frequency of ‘consensus decisions’ between sub-specialists attending a neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) regarding management of patients with extracranial carotid/vertebral stenoses and post-MDM ‘adherence’ to such advice. METHODS: This prospecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Offiah, Chika, Tierney, Sean, Egan, Bridget, Collins, Ronán D., Ryan, Daniel J., McCarthy, Allan J., Smith, Deirdre R., Mahon, James, Boyle, Emily, Delaney, Holly, O.’Donohoe, Rory, Hurley, Alison, Walsh, Richard A., Murphy, Sinead M., Bogdanova-Mihaylova, Petya, O.’Dowd, Sean, Kelly, Mark J., Omer, Taha, Coughlan, Tara, O’Neill, Desmond, Martin, Mary, Murphy, Stephen J. X., McCabe, Dominick J. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10119010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37081289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-023-03319-4
_version_ 1785145842440601600
author Offiah, Chika
Tierney, Sean
Egan, Bridget
Collins, Ronán D.
Ryan, Daniel J.
McCarthy, Allan J.
Smith, Deirdre R.
Mahon, James
Boyle, Emily
Delaney, Holly
O.’Donohoe, Rory
Hurley, Alison
Walsh, Richard A.
Murphy, Sinead M.
Bogdanova-Mihaylova, Petya
O.’Dowd, Sean
Kelly, Mark J.
Omer, Taha
Coughlan, Tara
O’Neill, Desmond
Martin, Mary
Murphy, Stephen J. X.
McCabe, Dominick J. H.
author_facet Offiah, Chika
Tierney, Sean
Egan, Bridget
Collins, Ronán D.
Ryan, Daniel J.
McCarthy, Allan J.
Smith, Deirdre R.
Mahon, James
Boyle, Emily
Delaney, Holly
O.’Donohoe, Rory
Hurley, Alison
Walsh, Richard A.
Murphy, Sinead M.
Bogdanova-Mihaylova, Petya
O.’Dowd, Sean
Kelly, Mark J.
Omer, Taha
Coughlan, Tara
O’Neill, Desmond
Martin, Mary
Murphy, Stephen J. X.
McCabe, Dominick J. H.
author_sort Offiah, Chika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Data are limited on the frequency of ‘consensus decisions’ between sub-specialists attending a neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) regarding management of patients with extracranial carotid/vertebral stenoses and post-MDM ‘adherence’ to such advice. METHODS: This prospective audit/quality improvement project collated prospectively-recorded data from a weekly Neurovascular/Stroke Centre MDM documenting the proportion of extracranial carotid/vertebral stenosis patients in whom ‘consensus management decisions’ were reached by neurologists, vascular surgeons, stroke physicians-geriatricians and neuroradiologists. Adherence to MDM advice was analysed in asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS), symptomatic carotid stenosis (SCS), ‘indeterminate symptomatic status stenosis’ (ISS) and vertebral artery stenosis (VAS) patients, including intervals between index event to MDM + / − intervention. RESULTS: One hundred fifteen patients were discussed: 108 with carotid stenosis and 7 with VAS. Consensus regarding management was noted in 96.5% (111/115): 100% with ACS and VAS, 96.2% with SCS and 92.9% with ISS. Adherence to MDM management advice was 96.4% (107/111): 100% in ACS, ISS and VAS patients; 92% (46/50) in SCS patients. The median interval from index symptoms to revascularisation in 50–99% SCS patients was 12.5 days (IQR: 9–18.3 days; N = 26), with a median interval from MDM to revascularisation of 5.5 days (IQR: 1–7 days). Thirty patients underwent revascularisation. Two out of twenty-nine patients (6.9%) with either SCS or ISS had a peri-procedural ipsilateral ischaemic stroke, with no further strokes/deaths during 3-months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The high frequency of inter-specialty consensus regarding management and adherence to proposed treatment supports a collaborative/multidisciplinary model of care in patients with extracranial arterial stenoses. Service development should aim to shorten times between MDM discussion-intervention and optimise prevention of stroke/death.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10119010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101190102023-12-03 Frequency of inter-specialty consensus decisions and adherence to advice following discussion at a weekly neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting Offiah, Chika Tierney, Sean Egan, Bridget Collins, Ronán D. Ryan, Daniel J. McCarthy, Allan J. Smith, Deirdre R. Mahon, James Boyle, Emily Delaney, Holly O.’Donohoe, Rory Hurley, Alison Walsh, Richard A. Murphy, Sinead M. Bogdanova-Mihaylova, Petya O.’Dowd, Sean Kelly, Mark J. Omer, Taha Coughlan, Tara O’Neill, Desmond Martin, Mary Murphy, Stephen J. X. McCabe, Dominick J. H. Ir J Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Data are limited on the frequency of ‘consensus decisions’ between sub-specialists attending a neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) regarding management of patients with extracranial carotid/vertebral stenoses and post-MDM ‘adherence’ to such advice. METHODS: This prospective audit/quality improvement project collated prospectively-recorded data from a weekly Neurovascular/Stroke Centre MDM documenting the proportion of extracranial carotid/vertebral stenosis patients in whom ‘consensus management decisions’ were reached by neurologists, vascular surgeons, stroke physicians-geriatricians and neuroradiologists. Adherence to MDM advice was analysed in asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS), symptomatic carotid stenosis (SCS), ‘indeterminate symptomatic status stenosis’ (ISS) and vertebral artery stenosis (VAS) patients, including intervals between index event to MDM + / − intervention. RESULTS: One hundred fifteen patients were discussed: 108 with carotid stenosis and 7 with VAS. Consensus regarding management was noted in 96.5% (111/115): 100% with ACS and VAS, 96.2% with SCS and 92.9% with ISS. Adherence to MDM management advice was 96.4% (107/111): 100% in ACS, ISS and VAS patients; 92% (46/50) in SCS patients. The median interval from index symptoms to revascularisation in 50–99% SCS patients was 12.5 days (IQR: 9–18.3 days; N = 26), with a median interval from MDM to revascularisation of 5.5 days (IQR: 1–7 days). Thirty patients underwent revascularisation. Two out of twenty-nine patients (6.9%) with either SCS or ISS had a peri-procedural ipsilateral ischaemic stroke, with no further strokes/deaths during 3-months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The high frequency of inter-specialty consensus regarding management and adherence to proposed treatment supports a collaborative/multidisciplinary model of care in patients with extracranial arterial stenoses. Service development should aim to shorten times between MDM discussion-intervention and optimise prevention of stroke/death. Springer International Publishing 2023-04-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10119010/ /pubmed/37081289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-023-03319-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Offiah, Chika
Tierney, Sean
Egan, Bridget
Collins, Ronán D.
Ryan, Daniel J.
McCarthy, Allan J.
Smith, Deirdre R.
Mahon, James
Boyle, Emily
Delaney, Holly
O.’Donohoe, Rory
Hurley, Alison
Walsh, Richard A.
Murphy, Sinead M.
Bogdanova-Mihaylova, Petya
O.’Dowd, Sean
Kelly, Mark J.
Omer, Taha
Coughlan, Tara
O’Neill, Desmond
Martin, Mary
Murphy, Stephen J. X.
McCabe, Dominick J. H.
Frequency of inter-specialty consensus decisions and adherence to advice following discussion at a weekly neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting
title Frequency of inter-specialty consensus decisions and adherence to advice following discussion at a weekly neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting
title_full Frequency of inter-specialty consensus decisions and adherence to advice following discussion at a weekly neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting
title_fullStr Frequency of inter-specialty consensus decisions and adherence to advice following discussion at a weekly neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting
title_full_unstemmed Frequency of inter-specialty consensus decisions and adherence to advice following discussion at a weekly neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting
title_short Frequency of inter-specialty consensus decisions and adherence to advice following discussion at a weekly neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting
title_sort frequency of inter-specialty consensus decisions and adherence to advice following discussion at a weekly neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10119010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37081289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-023-03319-4
work_keys_str_mv AT offiahchika frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT tierneysean frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT eganbridget frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT collinsronand frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT ryandanielj frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT mccarthyallanj frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT smithdeirdrer frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT mahonjames frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT boyleemily frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT delaneyholly frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT odonohoerory frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT hurleyalison frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT walshricharda frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT murphysineadm frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT bogdanovamihaylovapetya frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT odowdsean frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT kellymarkj frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT omertaha frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT coughlantara frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT oneilldesmond frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT martinmary frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT murphystephenjx frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting
AT mccabedominickjh frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting