Cargando…
Frequency of inter-specialty consensus decisions and adherence to advice following discussion at a weekly neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Data are limited on the frequency of ‘consensus decisions’ between sub-specialists attending a neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) regarding management of patients with extracranial carotid/vertebral stenoses and post-MDM ‘adherence’ to such advice. METHODS: This prospecti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10119010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37081289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-023-03319-4 |
_version_ | 1785145842440601600 |
---|---|
author | Offiah, Chika Tierney, Sean Egan, Bridget Collins, Ronán D. Ryan, Daniel J. McCarthy, Allan J. Smith, Deirdre R. Mahon, James Boyle, Emily Delaney, Holly O.’Donohoe, Rory Hurley, Alison Walsh, Richard A. Murphy, Sinead M. Bogdanova-Mihaylova, Petya O.’Dowd, Sean Kelly, Mark J. Omer, Taha Coughlan, Tara O’Neill, Desmond Martin, Mary Murphy, Stephen J. X. McCabe, Dominick J. H. |
author_facet | Offiah, Chika Tierney, Sean Egan, Bridget Collins, Ronán D. Ryan, Daniel J. McCarthy, Allan J. Smith, Deirdre R. Mahon, James Boyle, Emily Delaney, Holly O.’Donohoe, Rory Hurley, Alison Walsh, Richard A. Murphy, Sinead M. Bogdanova-Mihaylova, Petya O.’Dowd, Sean Kelly, Mark J. Omer, Taha Coughlan, Tara O’Neill, Desmond Martin, Mary Murphy, Stephen J. X. McCabe, Dominick J. H. |
author_sort | Offiah, Chika |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Data are limited on the frequency of ‘consensus decisions’ between sub-specialists attending a neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) regarding management of patients with extracranial carotid/vertebral stenoses and post-MDM ‘adherence’ to such advice. METHODS: This prospective audit/quality improvement project collated prospectively-recorded data from a weekly Neurovascular/Stroke Centre MDM documenting the proportion of extracranial carotid/vertebral stenosis patients in whom ‘consensus management decisions’ were reached by neurologists, vascular surgeons, stroke physicians-geriatricians and neuroradiologists. Adherence to MDM advice was analysed in asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS), symptomatic carotid stenosis (SCS), ‘indeterminate symptomatic status stenosis’ (ISS) and vertebral artery stenosis (VAS) patients, including intervals between index event to MDM + / − intervention. RESULTS: One hundred fifteen patients were discussed: 108 with carotid stenosis and 7 with VAS. Consensus regarding management was noted in 96.5% (111/115): 100% with ACS and VAS, 96.2% with SCS and 92.9% with ISS. Adherence to MDM management advice was 96.4% (107/111): 100% in ACS, ISS and VAS patients; 92% (46/50) in SCS patients. The median interval from index symptoms to revascularisation in 50–99% SCS patients was 12.5 days (IQR: 9–18.3 days; N = 26), with a median interval from MDM to revascularisation of 5.5 days (IQR: 1–7 days). Thirty patients underwent revascularisation. Two out of twenty-nine patients (6.9%) with either SCS or ISS had a peri-procedural ipsilateral ischaemic stroke, with no further strokes/deaths during 3-months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The high frequency of inter-specialty consensus regarding management and adherence to proposed treatment supports a collaborative/multidisciplinary model of care in patients with extracranial arterial stenoses. Service development should aim to shorten times between MDM discussion-intervention and optimise prevention of stroke/death. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10119010 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101190102023-12-03 Frequency of inter-specialty consensus decisions and adherence to advice following discussion at a weekly neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting Offiah, Chika Tierney, Sean Egan, Bridget Collins, Ronán D. Ryan, Daniel J. McCarthy, Allan J. Smith, Deirdre R. Mahon, James Boyle, Emily Delaney, Holly O.’Donohoe, Rory Hurley, Alison Walsh, Richard A. Murphy, Sinead M. Bogdanova-Mihaylova, Petya O.’Dowd, Sean Kelly, Mark J. Omer, Taha Coughlan, Tara O’Neill, Desmond Martin, Mary Murphy, Stephen J. X. McCabe, Dominick J. H. Ir J Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Data are limited on the frequency of ‘consensus decisions’ between sub-specialists attending a neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) regarding management of patients with extracranial carotid/vertebral stenoses and post-MDM ‘adherence’ to such advice. METHODS: This prospective audit/quality improvement project collated prospectively-recorded data from a weekly Neurovascular/Stroke Centre MDM documenting the proportion of extracranial carotid/vertebral stenosis patients in whom ‘consensus management decisions’ were reached by neurologists, vascular surgeons, stroke physicians-geriatricians and neuroradiologists. Adherence to MDM advice was analysed in asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS), symptomatic carotid stenosis (SCS), ‘indeterminate symptomatic status stenosis’ (ISS) and vertebral artery stenosis (VAS) patients, including intervals between index event to MDM + / − intervention. RESULTS: One hundred fifteen patients were discussed: 108 with carotid stenosis and 7 with VAS. Consensus regarding management was noted in 96.5% (111/115): 100% with ACS and VAS, 96.2% with SCS and 92.9% with ISS. Adherence to MDM management advice was 96.4% (107/111): 100% in ACS, ISS and VAS patients; 92% (46/50) in SCS patients. The median interval from index symptoms to revascularisation in 50–99% SCS patients was 12.5 days (IQR: 9–18.3 days; N = 26), with a median interval from MDM to revascularisation of 5.5 days (IQR: 1–7 days). Thirty patients underwent revascularisation. Two out of twenty-nine patients (6.9%) with either SCS or ISS had a peri-procedural ipsilateral ischaemic stroke, with no further strokes/deaths during 3-months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The high frequency of inter-specialty consensus regarding management and adherence to proposed treatment supports a collaborative/multidisciplinary model of care in patients with extracranial arterial stenoses. Service development should aim to shorten times between MDM discussion-intervention and optimise prevention of stroke/death. Springer International Publishing 2023-04-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10119010/ /pubmed/37081289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-023-03319-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Offiah, Chika Tierney, Sean Egan, Bridget Collins, Ronán D. Ryan, Daniel J. McCarthy, Allan J. Smith, Deirdre R. Mahon, James Boyle, Emily Delaney, Holly O.’Donohoe, Rory Hurley, Alison Walsh, Richard A. Murphy, Sinead M. Bogdanova-Mihaylova, Petya O.’Dowd, Sean Kelly, Mark J. Omer, Taha Coughlan, Tara O’Neill, Desmond Martin, Mary Murphy, Stephen J. X. McCabe, Dominick J. H. Frequency of inter-specialty consensus decisions and adherence to advice following discussion at a weekly neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting |
title | Frequency of inter-specialty consensus decisions and adherence to advice following discussion at a weekly neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting |
title_full | Frequency of inter-specialty consensus decisions and adherence to advice following discussion at a weekly neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting |
title_fullStr | Frequency of inter-specialty consensus decisions and adherence to advice following discussion at a weekly neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting |
title_full_unstemmed | Frequency of inter-specialty consensus decisions and adherence to advice following discussion at a weekly neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting |
title_short | Frequency of inter-specialty consensus decisions and adherence to advice following discussion at a weekly neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting |
title_sort | frequency of inter-specialty consensus decisions and adherence to advice following discussion at a weekly neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10119010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37081289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-023-03319-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT offiahchika frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT tierneysean frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT eganbridget frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT collinsronand frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT ryandanielj frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT mccarthyallanj frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT smithdeirdrer frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT mahonjames frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT boyleemily frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT delaneyholly frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT odonohoerory frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT hurleyalison frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT walshricharda frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT murphysineadm frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT bogdanovamihaylovapetya frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT odowdsean frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT kellymarkj frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT omertaha frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT coughlantara frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT oneilldesmond frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT martinmary frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT murphystephenjx frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting AT mccabedominickjh frequencyofinterspecialtyconsensusdecisionsandadherencetoadvicefollowingdiscussionataweeklyneurovascularmultidisciplinarymeeting |