Cargando…
Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm: impact on image quality in coronary computed tomography angiography
PURPOSE: To perform a comprehensive intraindividual objective and subjective image quality evaluation of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) reconstructed with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and to assess correlation with routinely applied hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm (ASiR-V). MA...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10119038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36847992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-023-01607-8 |
_version_ | 1785028936462237696 |
---|---|
author | De Santis, Domenico Polidori, Tiziano Tremamunno, Giuseppe Rucci, Carlotta Piccinni, Giulia Zerunian, Marta Pugliese, Luca Del Gaudio, Antonella Guido, Gisella Barbato, Luca Laghi, Andrea Caruso, Damiano |
author_facet | De Santis, Domenico Polidori, Tiziano Tremamunno, Giuseppe Rucci, Carlotta Piccinni, Giulia Zerunian, Marta Pugliese, Luca Del Gaudio, Antonella Guido, Gisella Barbato, Luca Laghi, Andrea Caruso, Damiano |
author_sort | De Santis, Domenico |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To perform a comprehensive intraindividual objective and subjective image quality evaluation of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) reconstructed with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and to assess correlation with routinely applied hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm (ASiR-V). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients (29 males) undergoing clinically indicated CCTA from April to December 2021 were prospectively enrolled. Fourteen datasets were reconstructed for each patient: three DLIR strength levels (DLIR_L, DLIR_M, and DLIR_H), ASiR-V from 10% to 100% in 10%-increment, and filtered back-projection (FBP). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) determined objective image quality. Subjective image quality was assessed with a 4-point Likert scale. Concordance between reconstruction algorithms was assessed by Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: DLIR algorithm did not impact vascular attenuation (P ≥ 0.374). DLIR_H showed the lowest noise, comparable with ASiR-V 100% (P = 1) and significantly lower than other reconstructions (P ≤ 0.021). DLIR_H achieved the highest objective quality, with SNR and CNR comparable to ASiR-V 100% (P = 0.139 and 0.075, respectively). DLIR_M obtained comparable objective image quality with ASiR-V 80% and 90% (P ≥ 0.281), while achieved the highest subjective image quality (4, IQR: 4–4; P ≤ 0.001). DLIR and ASiR-V datasets returned a very strong correlation in the assessment of CAD (r = 0.874, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: DLIR_M significantly improves CCTA image quality and has very strong correlation with routinely applied ASiR-V 50% dataset in the diagnosis of CAD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10119038 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101190382023-04-22 Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm: impact on image quality in coronary computed tomography angiography De Santis, Domenico Polidori, Tiziano Tremamunno, Giuseppe Rucci, Carlotta Piccinni, Giulia Zerunian, Marta Pugliese, Luca Del Gaudio, Antonella Guido, Gisella Barbato, Luca Laghi, Andrea Caruso, Damiano Radiol Med Cardiac Radiology PURPOSE: To perform a comprehensive intraindividual objective and subjective image quality evaluation of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) reconstructed with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and to assess correlation with routinely applied hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm (ASiR-V). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients (29 males) undergoing clinically indicated CCTA from April to December 2021 were prospectively enrolled. Fourteen datasets were reconstructed for each patient: three DLIR strength levels (DLIR_L, DLIR_M, and DLIR_H), ASiR-V from 10% to 100% in 10%-increment, and filtered back-projection (FBP). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) determined objective image quality. Subjective image quality was assessed with a 4-point Likert scale. Concordance between reconstruction algorithms was assessed by Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: DLIR algorithm did not impact vascular attenuation (P ≥ 0.374). DLIR_H showed the lowest noise, comparable with ASiR-V 100% (P = 1) and significantly lower than other reconstructions (P ≤ 0.021). DLIR_H achieved the highest objective quality, with SNR and CNR comparable to ASiR-V 100% (P = 0.139 and 0.075, respectively). DLIR_M obtained comparable objective image quality with ASiR-V 80% and 90% (P ≥ 0.281), while achieved the highest subjective image quality (4, IQR: 4–4; P ≤ 0.001). DLIR and ASiR-V datasets returned a very strong correlation in the assessment of CAD (r = 0.874, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: DLIR_M significantly improves CCTA image quality and has very strong correlation with routinely applied ASiR-V 50% dataset in the diagnosis of CAD. Springer Milan 2023-02-27 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10119038/ /pubmed/36847992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-023-01607-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Cardiac Radiology De Santis, Domenico Polidori, Tiziano Tremamunno, Giuseppe Rucci, Carlotta Piccinni, Giulia Zerunian, Marta Pugliese, Luca Del Gaudio, Antonella Guido, Gisella Barbato, Luca Laghi, Andrea Caruso, Damiano Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm: impact on image quality in coronary computed tomography angiography |
title | Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm: impact on image quality in coronary computed tomography angiography |
title_full | Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm: impact on image quality in coronary computed tomography angiography |
title_fullStr | Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm: impact on image quality in coronary computed tomography angiography |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm: impact on image quality in coronary computed tomography angiography |
title_short | Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm: impact on image quality in coronary computed tomography angiography |
title_sort | deep learning image reconstruction algorithm: impact on image quality in coronary computed tomography angiography |
topic | Cardiac Radiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10119038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36847992 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11547-023-01607-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT desantisdomenico deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmimpactonimagequalityincoronarycomputedtomographyangiography AT polidoritiziano deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmimpactonimagequalityincoronarycomputedtomographyangiography AT tremamunnogiuseppe deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmimpactonimagequalityincoronarycomputedtomographyangiography AT ruccicarlotta deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmimpactonimagequalityincoronarycomputedtomographyangiography AT piccinnigiulia deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmimpactonimagequalityincoronarycomputedtomographyangiography AT zerunianmarta deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmimpactonimagequalityincoronarycomputedtomographyangiography AT puglieseluca deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmimpactonimagequalityincoronarycomputedtomographyangiography AT delgaudioantonella deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmimpactonimagequalityincoronarycomputedtomographyangiography AT guidogisella deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmimpactonimagequalityincoronarycomputedtomographyangiography AT barbatoluca deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmimpactonimagequalityincoronarycomputedtomographyangiography AT laghiandrea deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmimpactonimagequalityincoronarycomputedtomographyangiography AT carusodamiano deeplearningimagereconstructionalgorithmimpactonimagequalityincoronarycomputedtomographyangiography |