Cargando…

Machine learning predictive performance evaluation of conventional and fuzzy radiomics in clinical cancer imaging cohorts

BACKGROUND: Hybrid imaging became an instrumental part of medical imaging, particularly cancer imaging processes in clinical routine. To date, several radiomic and machine learning studies investigated the feasibility of in vivo tumor characterization with variable outcomes. This study aims to inves...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grahovac, M., Spielvogel, C. P., Krajnc, D., Ecsedi, B., Traub-Weidinger, T., Rasul, S., Kluge, K., Zhao, M., Li, X., Hacker, M., Haug, A., Papp, Laszlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10119059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36738311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06127-1
_version_ 1785028941195509760
author Grahovac, M.
Spielvogel, C. P.
Krajnc, D.
Ecsedi, B.
Traub-Weidinger, T.
Rasul, S.
Kluge, K.
Zhao, M.
Li, X.
Hacker, M.
Haug, A.
Papp, Laszlo
author_facet Grahovac, M.
Spielvogel, C. P.
Krajnc, D.
Ecsedi, B.
Traub-Weidinger, T.
Rasul, S.
Kluge, K.
Zhao, M.
Li, X.
Hacker, M.
Haug, A.
Papp, Laszlo
author_sort Grahovac, M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hybrid imaging became an instrumental part of medical imaging, particularly cancer imaging processes in clinical routine. To date, several radiomic and machine learning studies investigated the feasibility of in vivo tumor characterization with variable outcomes. This study aims to investigate the effect of recently proposed fuzzy radiomics and compare its predictive performance to conventional radiomics in cancer imaging cohorts. In addition, lesion vs. lesion+surrounding fuzzy and conventional radiomic analysis was conducted. METHODS: Previously published 11C Methionine (MET) positron emission tomography (PET) glioma, 18F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) lung, and 68GA-PSMA-11 PET/magneto-resonance imaging (MRI) prostate cancer retrospective cohorts were included in the analysis to predict their respective clinical endpoints. Four delineation methods including manually defined reference binary (Ref-B), its smoothed, fuzzified version (Ref-F), as well as extended binary (Ext-B) and its fuzzified version (Ext-F) were incorporated to extract imaging biomarker standardization initiative (IBSI)-conform radiomic features from each cohort. Machine learning for the four delineation approaches was performed utilizing a Monte Carlo cross-validation scheme to estimate the predictive performance of the four delineation methods. RESULTS: Reference fuzzy (Ref-F) delineation outperformed its binary delineation (Ref-B) counterpart in all cohorts within a volume range of 938–354987 mm(3) with relative cross-validation area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) of  +4.7–10.4. Compared to Ref-B, the highest AUC performance difference was observed by the Ref-F delineation in the glioma cohort (Ref-F: 0.74 vs. Ref-B: 0.70) and in the prostate cohort by Ref-F and Ext-F (Ref-F: 0.84, Ext-F: 0.86 vs. Ref-B: 0.80). In addition, fuzzy radiomics decreased feature redundancy by approx. 20%. CONCLUSIONS: Fuzzy radiomics has the potential to increase predictive performance particularly in small lesion sizes compared to conventional binary radiomics in PET. We hypothesize that this effect is due to the ability of fuzzy radiomics to model partial volume effects and delineation uncertainties at small lesion boundaries. In addition, we consider that the lower redundancy of fuzzy radiomic features supports the identification of imaging biomarkers in future studies. Future studies shall consider systematically analyzing lesions and their surroundings with fuzzy and binary radiomics. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-023-06127-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10119059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101190592023-04-22 Machine learning predictive performance evaluation of conventional and fuzzy radiomics in clinical cancer imaging cohorts Grahovac, M. Spielvogel, C. P. Krajnc, D. Ecsedi, B. Traub-Weidinger, T. Rasul, S. Kluge, K. Zhao, M. Li, X. Hacker, M. Haug, A. Papp, Laszlo Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article BACKGROUND: Hybrid imaging became an instrumental part of medical imaging, particularly cancer imaging processes in clinical routine. To date, several radiomic and machine learning studies investigated the feasibility of in vivo tumor characterization with variable outcomes. This study aims to investigate the effect of recently proposed fuzzy radiomics and compare its predictive performance to conventional radiomics in cancer imaging cohorts. In addition, lesion vs. lesion+surrounding fuzzy and conventional radiomic analysis was conducted. METHODS: Previously published 11C Methionine (MET) positron emission tomography (PET) glioma, 18F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) lung, and 68GA-PSMA-11 PET/magneto-resonance imaging (MRI) prostate cancer retrospective cohorts were included in the analysis to predict their respective clinical endpoints. Four delineation methods including manually defined reference binary (Ref-B), its smoothed, fuzzified version (Ref-F), as well as extended binary (Ext-B) and its fuzzified version (Ext-F) were incorporated to extract imaging biomarker standardization initiative (IBSI)-conform radiomic features from each cohort. Machine learning for the four delineation approaches was performed utilizing a Monte Carlo cross-validation scheme to estimate the predictive performance of the four delineation methods. RESULTS: Reference fuzzy (Ref-F) delineation outperformed its binary delineation (Ref-B) counterpart in all cohorts within a volume range of 938–354987 mm(3) with relative cross-validation area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) of  +4.7–10.4. Compared to Ref-B, the highest AUC performance difference was observed by the Ref-F delineation in the glioma cohort (Ref-F: 0.74 vs. Ref-B: 0.70) and in the prostate cohort by Ref-F and Ext-F (Ref-F: 0.84, Ext-F: 0.86 vs. Ref-B: 0.80). In addition, fuzzy radiomics decreased feature redundancy by approx. 20%. CONCLUSIONS: Fuzzy radiomics has the potential to increase predictive performance particularly in small lesion sizes compared to conventional binary radiomics in PET. We hypothesize that this effect is due to the ability of fuzzy radiomics to model partial volume effects and delineation uncertainties at small lesion boundaries. In addition, we consider that the lower redundancy of fuzzy radiomic features supports the identification of imaging biomarkers in future studies. Future studies shall consider systematically analyzing lesions and their surroundings with fuzzy and binary radiomics. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-023-06127-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-02-04 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10119059/ /pubmed/36738311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06127-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Grahovac, M.
Spielvogel, C. P.
Krajnc, D.
Ecsedi, B.
Traub-Weidinger, T.
Rasul, S.
Kluge, K.
Zhao, M.
Li, X.
Hacker, M.
Haug, A.
Papp, Laszlo
Machine learning predictive performance evaluation of conventional and fuzzy radiomics in clinical cancer imaging cohorts
title Machine learning predictive performance evaluation of conventional and fuzzy radiomics in clinical cancer imaging cohorts
title_full Machine learning predictive performance evaluation of conventional and fuzzy radiomics in clinical cancer imaging cohorts
title_fullStr Machine learning predictive performance evaluation of conventional and fuzzy radiomics in clinical cancer imaging cohorts
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning predictive performance evaluation of conventional and fuzzy radiomics in clinical cancer imaging cohorts
title_short Machine learning predictive performance evaluation of conventional and fuzzy radiomics in clinical cancer imaging cohorts
title_sort machine learning predictive performance evaluation of conventional and fuzzy radiomics in clinical cancer imaging cohorts
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10119059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36738311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06127-1
work_keys_str_mv AT grahovacm machinelearningpredictiveperformanceevaluationofconventionalandfuzzyradiomicsinclinicalcancerimagingcohorts
AT spielvogelcp machinelearningpredictiveperformanceevaluationofconventionalandfuzzyradiomicsinclinicalcancerimagingcohorts
AT krajncd machinelearningpredictiveperformanceevaluationofconventionalandfuzzyradiomicsinclinicalcancerimagingcohorts
AT ecsedib machinelearningpredictiveperformanceevaluationofconventionalandfuzzyradiomicsinclinicalcancerimagingcohorts
AT traubweidingert machinelearningpredictiveperformanceevaluationofconventionalandfuzzyradiomicsinclinicalcancerimagingcohorts
AT rasuls machinelearningpredictiveperformanceevaluationofconventionalandfuzzyradiomicsinclinicalcancerimagingcohorts
AT klugek machinelearningpredictiveperformanceevaluationofconventionalandfuzzyradiomicsinclinicalcancerimagingcohorts
AT zhaom machinelearningpredictiveperformanceevaluationofconventionalandfuzzyradiomicsinclinicalcancerimagingcohorts
AT lix machinelearningpredictiveperformanceevaluationofconventionalandfuzzyradiomicsinclinicalcancerimagingcohorts
AT hackerm machinelearningpredictiveperformanceevaluationofconventionalandfuzzyradiomicsinclinicalcancerimagingcohorts
AT hauga machinelearningpredictiveperformanceevaluationofconventionalandfuzzyradiomicsinclinicalcancerimagingcohorts
AT papplaszlo machinelearningpredictiveperformanceevaluationofconventionalandfuzzyradiomicsinclinicalcancerimagingcohorts