Cargando…
A comparison of simplified protocols of personalized dosimetry in NEN patients treated by radioligand therapy (RLT) with [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTATATE to favor its use in clinical practice
ABSTRACT: The role of internal dosimetry is usually proposed for investigational purposes in patients treated by RLT, even if its application is not yet the standard method in clinical practice. This limited use is partially justified by several concomitant factors that make calculations a complex p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10119237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36688980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06112-8 |
_version_ | 1785028982296543232 |
---|---|
author | Pirozzi Palmese, Valentina D’Ambrosio, Laura Di Gennaro, Francesca Maisto, Costantina de Marino, Roberta Morisco, Anna Coluccia, Sergio Di Gennaro, Piergiacomo De Lauro, Francesco Raddi, Marco Gaballo, Paolo Tafuto, Salvatore Celentano, Egidio Lastoria, Secondo |
author_facet | Pirozzi Palmese, Valentina D’Ambrosio, Laura Di Gennaro, Francesca Maisto, Costantina de Marino, Roberta Morisco, Anna Coluccia, Sergio Di Gennaro, Piergiacomo De Lauro, Francesco Raddi, Marco Gaballo, Paolo Tafuto, Salvatore Celentano, Egidio Lastoria, Secondo |
author_sort | Pirozzi Palmese, Valentina |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: The role of internal dosimetry is usually proposed for investigational purposes in patients treated by RLT, even if its application is not yet the standard method in clinical practice. This limited use is partially justified by several concomitant factors that make calculations a complex process. Therefore, simplified dosimetry protocols are required. METHODS: In our study, dosimetric evaluations were performed in thirty patients with NENs who underwent RLT with [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTATATE. The reference method (M0) calculated the cumulative absorbed dose performing dosimetry after each of the four cycles. Obtained data were employed to assess the feasibility of simplified protocols: defining the dosimetry only after the first cycle (M1) and after the first and last one (M2). RESULTS: The mean differences of the cumulative absorbed doses between M1 and M0 were – 10% for kidney, – 5% for spleen, + 34% for liver, + 13% for red marrow, and + 37% for tumor lesions. Conversely, differences lower than ± 10% were measured between M2 and M0. CONCLUSION: Cumulative absorbed doses obtained with the M2 protocol resembled the doses calculated by M0, while the M1 protocol overestimated the absorbed doses in all organs at risk, except for the spleen. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10119237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101192372023-04-22 A comparison of simplified protocols of personalized dosimetry in NEN patients treated by radioligand therapy (RLT) with [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTATATE to favor its use in clinical practice Pirozzi Palmese, Valentina D’Ambrosio, Laura Di Gennaro, Francesca Maisto, Costantina de Marino, Roberta Morisco, Anna Coluccia, Sergio Di Gennaro, Piergiacomo De Lauro, Francesco Raddi, Marco Gaballo, Paolo Tafuto, Salvatore Celentano, Egidio Lastoria, Secondo Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article ABSTRACT: The role of internal dosimetry is usually proposed for investigational purposes in patients treated by RLT, even if its application is not yet the standard method in clinical practice. This limited use is partially justified by several concomitant factors that make calculations a complex process. Therefore, simplified dosimetry protocols are required. METHODS: In our study, dosimetric evaluations were performed in thirty patients with NENs who underwent RLT with [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTATATE. The reference method (M0) calculated the cumulative absorbed dose performing dosimetry after each of the four cycles. Obtained data were employed to assess the feasibility of simplified protocols: defining the dosimetry only after the first cycle (M1) and after the first and last one (M2). RESULTS: The mean differences of the cumulative absorbed doses between M1 and M0 were – 10% for kidney, – 5% for spleen, + 34% for liver, + 13% for red marrow, and + 37% for tumor lesions. Conversely, differences lower than ± 10% were measured between M2 and M0. CONCLUSION: Cumulative absorbed doses obtained with the M2 protocol resembled the doses calculated by M0, while the M1 protocol overestimated the absorbed doses in all organs at risk, except for the spleen. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-01-23 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10119237/ /pubmed/36688980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06112-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Pirozzi Palmese, Valentina D’Ambrosio, Laura Di Gennaro, Francesca Maisto, Costantina de Marino, Roberta Morisco, Anna Coluccia, Sergio Di Gennaro, Piergiacomo De Lauro, Francesco Raddi, Marco Gaballo, Paolo Tafuto, Salvatore Celentano, Egidio Lastoria, Secondo A comparison of simplified protocols of personalized dosimetry in NEN patients treated by radioligand therapy (RLT) with [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTATATE to favor its use in clinical practice |
title | A comparison of simplified protocols of personalized dosimetry in NEN patients treated by radioligand therapy (RLT) with [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTATATE to favor its use in clinical practice |
title_full | A comparison of simplified protocols of personalized dosimetry in NEN patients treated by radioligand therapy (RLT) with [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTATATE to favor its use in clinical practice |
title_fullStr | A comparison of simplified protocols of personalized dosimetry in NEN patients treated by radioligand therapy (RLT) with [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTATATE to favor its use in clinical practice |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of simplified protocols of personalized dosimetry in NEN patients treated by radioligand therapy (RLT) with [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTATATE to favor its use in clinical practice |
title_short | A comparison of simplified protocols of personalized dosimetry in NEN patients treated by radioligand therapy (RLT) with [(177)Lu]Lu-DOTATATE to favor its use in clinical practice |
title_sort | comparison of simplified protocols of personalized dosimetry in nen patients treated by radioligand therapy (rlt) with [(177)lu]lu-dotatate to favor its use in clinical practice |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10119237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36688980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06112-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pirozzipalmesevalentina acomparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT dambrosiolaura acomparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT digennarofrancesca acomparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT maistocostantina acomparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT demarinoroberta acomparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT moriscoanna acomparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT colucciasergio acomparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT digennaropiergiacomo acomparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT delaurofrancesco acomparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT raddimarco acomparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT gaballopaolo acomparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT tafutosalvatore acomparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT celentanoegidio acomparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT lastoriasecondo acomparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT pirozzipalmesevalentina comparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT dambrosiolaura comparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT digennarofrancesca comparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT maistocostantina comparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT demarinoroberta comparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT moriscoanna comparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT colucciasergio comparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT digennaropiergiacomo comparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT delaurofrancesco comparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT raddimarco comparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT gaballopaolo comparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT tafutosalvatore comparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT celentanoegidio comparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice AT lastoriasecondo comparisonofsimplifiedprotocolsofpersonalizeddosimetryinnenpatientstreatedbyradioligandtherapyrltwith177luludotatatetofavoritsuseinclinicalpractice |