Cargando…

The Impact of Suboxone’s Market Exclusivity on Cost of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment

BACKGROUND: Buprenorphine-naloxone is an essential part of the response to opioid poisoning rates in North America. Manipulating market exclusivity is a strategy manufacturers use to increase profitability, as evidenced by Suboxone in the USA. OBJECTIVE: To investigate excess costs of buprenorphine-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGee, Meghan, Chiu, Kellia, Moineddin, Rahim, Sud, Abhimanyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10119248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36652186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-022-00787-0
_version_ 1785028984825708544
author McGee, Meghan
Chiu, Kellia
Moineddin, Rahim
Sud, Abhimanyu
author_facet McGee, Meghan
Chiu, Kellia
Moineddin, Rahim
Sud, Abhimanyu
author_sort McGee, Meghan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Buprenorphine-naloxone is an essential part of the response to opioid poisoning rates in North America. Manipulating market exclusivity is a strategy manufacturers use to increase profitability, as evidenced by Suboxone in the USA. OBJECTIVE: To investigate excess costs of buprenorphine-naloxone due to unmerited market exclusivity (no legal patent or data protection) in Canada. METHODS: Using controlled interrupted time-series, this study examined changes in the cost of buprenorphine-naloxone before and after the first generics were listed on public formularies. Methadone cost was the control. Public data from the Canadian Institute of Health Information in British Columbia, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan were used. All buprenorphine-naloxone and methadone claims (2010–2019) accepted for payment by the provincial drug plan/programme were collected. Primary outcome was mean cost per mg of buprenorphine-naloxone after the first listing of generics. RESULTS: Mean cost per mg of buprenorphine-naloxone before the first listing of generics was $1.21 CAD in British Columbia, $1.27 CAD in Manitoba, and $0.85 CAD in Saskatchewan. Following the introduction of generics, the cost per mg decreased by $0.22 CAD (95% CI − 0.33 to − 0.10; p = 0.0014) in British Columbia, $0.36 CAD (95% CI − 0.58 to − 0.13; p = 0.004) in Manitoba, and $0.27 CAD (95% CI − 0.50 to − 0.05; p = 0.03) in Saskatchewan. Mean cost per mg decreased by $0.26 CAD (95% CI − 0.38 to − 0.13; p = 0.0004) after a third generic was introduced in British Columbia. Excess costs to public formularies during the 4- to 5-year period prior to the listing of generics were $1,992,558 CAD in British Columbia, $80,876 CAD in Manitoba, and $4130 CAD in Saskatchewan. If buprenorphine-naloxone cost $0.61 CAD (mean cost after the third generic entered) instead of $1.21 CAD per mg during the pre-generics period, public payers in British Columbia could have saved $5,016,220 CAD between 2011 and 2015. CONCLUSIONS: Unmerited 6 years of market exclusivity for brand-name buprenorphine-naloxone in Canada resulted in substantial excess costs. There is an urgent need to implement policies that can help reduce costs for high-priority drugs in Canada. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40258-022-00787-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10119248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101192482023-04-22 The Impact of Suboxone’s Market Exclusivity on Cost of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment McGee, Meghan Chiu, Kellia Moineddin, Rahim Sud, Abhimanyu Appl Health Econ Health Policy Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Buprenorphine-naloxone is an essential part of the response to opioid poisoning rates in North America. Manipulating market exclusivity is a strategy manufacturers use to increase profitability, as evidenced by Suboxone in the USA. OBJECTIVE: To investigate excess costs of buprenorphine-naloxone due to unmerited market exclusivity (no legal patent or data protection) in Canada. METHODS: Using controlled interrupted time-series, this study examined changes in the cost of buprenorphine-naloxone before and after the first generics were listed on public formularies. Methadone cost was the control. Public data from the Canadian Institute of Health Information in British Columbia, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan were used. All buprenorphine-naloxone and methadone claims (2010–2019) accepted for payment by the provincial drug plan/programme were collected. Primary outcome was mean cost per mg of buprenorphine-naloxone after the first listing of generics. RESULTS: Mean cost per mg of buprenorphine-naloxone before the first listing of generics was $1.21 CAD in British Columbia, $1.27 CAD in Manitoba, and $0.85 CAD in Saskatchewan. Following the introduction of generics, the cost per mg decreased by $0.22 CAD (95% CI − 0.33 to − 0.10; p = 0.0014) in British Columbia, $0.36 CAD (95% CI − 0.58 to − 0.13; p = 0.004) in Manitoba, and $0.27 CAD (95% CI − 0.50 to − 0.05; p = 0.03) in Saskatchewan. Mean cost per mg decreased by $0.26 CAD (95% CI − 0.38 to − 0.13; p = 0.0004) after a third generic was introduced in British Columbia. Excess costs to public formularies during the 4- to 5-year period prior to the listing of generics were $1,992,558 CAD in British Columbia, $80,876 CAD in Manitoba, and $4130 CAD in Saskatchewan. If buprenorphine-naloxone cost $0.61 CAD (mean cost after the third generic entered) instead of $1.21 CAD per mg during the pre-generics period, public payers in British Columbia could have saved $5,016,220 CAD between 2011 and 2015. CONCLUSIONS: Unmerited 6 years of market exclusivity for brand-name buprenorphine-naloxone in Canada resulted in substantial excess costs. There is an urgent need to implement policies that can help reduce costs for high-priority drugs in Canada. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40258-022-00787-0. Springer International Publishing 2023-01-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10119248/ /pubmed/36652186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-022-00787-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
McGee, Meghan
Chiu, Kellia
Moineddin, Rahim
Sud, Abhimanyu
The Impact of Suboxone’s Market Exclusivity on Cost of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
title The Impact of Suboxone’s Market Exclusivity on Cost of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
title_full The Impact of Suboxone’s Market Exclusivity on Cost of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
title_fullStr The Impact of Suboxone’s Market Exclusivity on Cost of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Suboxone’s Market Exclusivity on Cost of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
title_short The Impact of Suboxone’s Market Exclusivity on Cost of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
title_sort impact of suboxone’s market exclusivity on cost of opioid use disorder treatment
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10119248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36652186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40258-022-00787-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgeemeghan theimpactofsuboxonesmarketexclusivityoncostofopioidusedisordertreatment
AT chiukellia theimpactofsuboxonesmarketexclusivityoncostofopioidusedisordertreatment
AT moineddinrahim theimpactofsuboxonesmarketexclusivityoncostofopioidusedisordertreatment
AT sudabhimanyu theimpactofsuboxonesmarketexclusivityoncostofopioidusedisordertreatment
AT mcgeemeghan impactofsuboxonesmarketexclusivityoncostofopioidusedisordertreatment
AT chiukellia impactofsuboxonesmarketexclusivityoncostofopioidusedisordertreatment
AT moineddinrahim impactofsuboxonesmarketexclusivityoncostofopioidusedisordertreatment
AT sudabhimanyu impactofsuboxonesmarketexclusivityoncostofopioidusedisordertreatment