Cargando…

Low Radiologic Sensitivity in Detecting Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma (RAS)

Due to its rarity, literature pertaining to radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma (RAS) remains sparse, with most studies focusing on retrospective review. Of more significant concern is the ambiguity of screening recommendations and modalities used to detect RAS, with current guidelines focusing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fakhry, Jonathan, Hanna, Mariam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10119970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37090301
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36508
_version_ 1785029097449062400
author Fakhry, Jonathan
Hanna, Mariam
author_facet Fakhry, Jonathan
Hanna, Mariam
author_sort Fakhry, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description Due to its rarity, literature pertaining to radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma (RAS) remains sparse, with most studies focusing on retrospective review. Of more significant concern is the ambiguity of screening recommendations and modalities used to detect RAS, with current guidelines focusing on yearly mammographic imaging for women who underwent lumpectomy with radiation. Unfortunately, routine post-cancer screening has demonstrated low sensitivity in detecting RAS, often mistaking it for benign changes in roughly half of cases. We present an 83-year-old woman initially diagnosed with stage 1 invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast who underwent a lumpectomy followed by radiation with 6040 cGy. Five years after her initial diagnosis, the patient noticed a suspicious lesion which then led her to undergo multiple modalities of imaging that described benign features. After continued concern, a biopsy was taken that demonstrated RAS of the left breast within the irradiated site. The patient underwent further radiation and declined surgical intervention. Routine screening with mammography and ultrasonography following breast radiation treatment are not sensitive modalities in detecting RAS. High-risk patient groups treated with greater than 0.5 Gy of radiation with concerning physical features 2-10 years after treatment should undergo MRI with biopsy at the initial concern to rule out angiosarcoma. Benign findings on imaging with patients in these groups should also consider biopsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10119970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101199702023-04-22 Low Radiologic Sensitivity in Detecting Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma (RAS) Fakhry, Jonathan Hanna, Mariam Cureus Radiation Oncology Due to its rarity, literature pertaining to radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma (RAS) remains sparse, with most studies focusing on retrospective review. Of more significant concern is the ambiguity of screening recommendations and modalities used to detect RAS, with current guidelines focusing on yearly mammographic imaging for women who underwent lumpectomy with radiation. Unfortunately, routine post-cancer screening has demonstrated low sensitivity in detecting RAS, often mistaking it for benign changes in roughly half of cases. We present an 83-year-old woman initially diagnosed with stage 1 invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast who underwent a lumpectomy followed by radiation with 6040 cGy. Five years after her initial diagnosis, the patient noticed a suspicious lesion which then led her to undergo multiple modalities of imaging that described benign features. After continued concern, a biopsy was taken that demonstrated RAS of the left breast within the irradiated site. The patient underwent further radiation and declined surgical intervention. Routine screening with mammography and ultrasonography following breast radiation treatment are not sensitive modalities in detecting RAS. High-risk patient groups treated with greater than 0.5 Gy of radiation with concerning physical features 2-10 years after treatment should undergo MRI with biopsy at the initial concern to rule out angiosarcoma. Benign findings on imaging with patients in these groups should also consider biopsy. Cureus 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10119970/ /pubmed/37090301 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36508 Text en Copyright © 2023, Fakhry et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology
Fakhry, Jonathan
Hanna, Mariam
Low Radiologic Sensitivity in Detecting Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma (RAS)
title Low Radiologic Sensitivity in Detecting Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma (RAS)
title_full Low Radiologic Sensitivity in Detecting Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma (RAS)
title_fullStr Low Radiologic Sensitivity in Detecting Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma (RAS)
title_full_unstemmed Low Radiologic Sensitivity in Detecting Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma (RAS)
title_short Low Radiologic Sensitivity in Detecting Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma (RAS)
title_sort low radiologic sensitivity in detecting radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma (ras)
topic Radiation Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10119970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37090301
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36508
work_keys_str_mv AT fakhryjonathan lowradiologicsensitivityindetectingradiationassociatedbreastangiosarcomaras
AT hannamariam lowradiologicsensitivityindetectingradiationassociatedbreastangiosarcomaras