Cargando…
Low Radiologic Sensitivity in Detecting Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma (RAS)
Due to its rarity, literature pertaining to radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma (RAS) remains sparse, with most studies focusing on retrospective review. Of more significant concern is the ambiguity of screening recommendations and modalities used to detect RAS, with current guidelines focusing...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10119970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37090301 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36508 |
_version_ | 1785029097449062400 |
---|---|
author | Fakhry, Jonathan Hanna, Mariam |
author_facet | Fakhry, Jonathan Hanna, Mariam |
author_sort | Fakhry, Jonathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Due to its rarity, literature pertaining to radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma (RAS) remains sparse, with most studies focusing on retrospective review. Of more significant concern is the ambiguity of screening recommendations and modalities used to detect RAS, with current guidelines focusing on yearly mammographic imaging for women who underwent lumpectomy with radiation. Unfortunately, routine post-cancer screening has demonstrated low sensitivity in detecting RAS, often mistaking it for benign changes in roughly half of cases. We present an 83-year-old woman initially diagnosed with stage 1 invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast who underwent a lumpectomy followed by radiation with 6040 cGy. Five years after her initial diagnosis, the patient noticed a suspicious lesion which then led her to undergo multiple modalities of imaging that described benign features. After continued concern, a biopsy was taken that demonstrated RAS of the left breast within the irradiated site. The patient underwent further radiation and declined surgical intervention. Routine screening with mammography and ultrasonography following breast radiation treatment are not sensitive modalities in detecting RAS. High-risk patient groups treated with greater than 0.5 Gy of radiation with concerning physical features 2-10 years after treatment should undergo MRI with biopsy at the initial concern to rule out angiosarcoma. Benign findings on imaging with patients in these groups should also consider biopsy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10119970 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101199702023-04-22 Low Radiologic Sensitivity in Detecting Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma (RAS) Fakhry, Jonathan Hanna, Mariam Cureus Radiation Oncology Due to its rarity, literature pertaining to radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma (RAS) remains sparse, with most studies focusing on retrospective review. Of more significant concern is the ambiguity of screening recommendations and modalities used to detect RAS, with current guidelines focusing on yearly mammographic imaging for women who underwent lumpectomy with radiation. Unfortunately, routine post-cancer screening has demonstrated low sensitivity in detecting RAS, often mistaking it for benign changes in roughly half of cases. We present an 83-year-old woman initially diagnosed with stage 1 invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast who underwent a lumpectomy followed by radiation with 6040 cGy. Five years after her initial diagnosis, the patient noticed a suspicious lesion which then led her to undergo multiple modalities of imaging that described benign features. After continued concern, a biopsy was taken that demonstrated RAS of the left breast within the irradiated site. The patient underwent further radiation and declined surgical intervention. Routine screening with mammography and ultrasonography following breast radiation treatment are not sensitive modalities in detecting RAS. High-risk patient groups treated with greater than 0.5 Gy of radiation with concerning physical features 2-10 years after treatment should undergo MRI with biopsy at the initial concern to rule out angiosarcoma. Benign findings on imaging with patients in these groups should also consider biopsy. Cureus 2023-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10119970/ /pubmed/37090301 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36508 Text en Copyright © 2023, Fakhry et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Fakhry, Jonathan Hanna, Mariam Low Radiologic Sensitivity in Detecting Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma (RAS) |
title | Low Radiologic Sensitivity in Detecting Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma (RAS) |
title_full | Low Radiologic Sensitivity in Detecting Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma (RAS) |
title_fullStr | Low Radiologic Sensitivity in Detecting Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma (RAS) |
title_full_unstemmed | Low Radiologic Sensitivity in Detecting Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma (RAS) |
title_short | Low Radiologic Sensitivity in Detecting Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma (RAS) |
title_sort | low radiologic sensitivity in detecting radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma (ras) |
topic | Radiation Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10119970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37090301 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36508 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fakhryjonathan lowradiologicsensitivityindetectingradiationassociatedbreastangiosarcomaras AT hannamariam lowradiologicsensitivityindetectingradiationassociatedbreastangiosarcomaras |