Cargando…

Effect of gestational weight gain on postpartum pelvic floor function in twin primiparas: a single-center retrospective study in China

BACKGROUND: The effect of gestational weight gain (GWG) as a controllable factor during pregnancy pelvic floor function has rarely been investigated, and studies on twin primiparas are even less frequent. The objective of the present study was to explore the effect of GWG on postpartum pelvic floor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Ying, Luo, Yetao, Zhou, Qirong, Xu, Jiangyang, Tian, Shengyu, Liao, Bizhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10120153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37081492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-05602-9
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The effect of gestational weight gain (GWG) as a controllable factor during pregnancy pelvic floor function has rarely been investigated, and studies on twin primiparas are even less frequent. The objective of the present study was to explore the effect of GWG on postpartum pelvic floor function in twin primiparas. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 184 twin primiparas in the pelvic floor rehabilitation system of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2020 to October 2021. Based on the GWG criteria recommended by the Institute of Medicine, the study subjects were classified into two groups: adequate GWG and excessive GWG. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were applied to explore the relationship between GWG and pelvic floor function. RESULTS: Among the 184 twin primiparas, 20 (10.87%) had excessive GWG. The rates of abnormal vaginal dynamic pressure (95% vs. 74.39%), injured type I muscle fibers (80% vs. 45.73%), anterior vaginal wall prolapse (90% vs. 68.90%), and stress urinary incontinence (50% vs. 20.12%) of twin primiparas with excessive GWG were significantly higher than those with adequate GWG. There was no significant difference between the total score of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-Short Form 20 (PFDI-20) or the scores of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory 6 (POPDI-6), the Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory 8 (CRADI-8), and the Urinary Distress Inventory 6 (UDI-6) in the two groups (P > 0.05). After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the results showed that excessive GWG was positively associated with abnormal vaginal dynamic pressure (OR = 8.038, 95% CI: 1.001–64.514), injured type I muscle fibers (OR = 8.654, 95% CI: 2.462–30.416), anterior vaginal wall prolapse (OR = 4.705, 95% CI: 1.004–22.054), and stress urinary incontinence (OR = 4.424, 95% CI: 1.578–12.403). CONCLUSION: Excessive GWG in twin primiparas was positively correlated with the prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunction but did not exacerbate pelvic floor symptoms in twin primiparas. Controlling GWG within a reasonable range is recommended for reducing the risk of PFDs in pregnant women with twins.