Cargando…

Intraoperative active and passive breaks during minimally invasive surgery influence upper extremity physical strain and physical stress response—A controlled, randomized cross-over, laboratory trial

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the effect of passive, active or no intra-operative work breaks on static, median and peak muscular activity, muscular fatigue, upper body postures, heart rate, and heart rate variability. BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic surgery is preferred over open surgery for the benefit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luger, Tessy, Bonsch, Rosina, Seibt, Robert, Krämer, Bernhard, Rieger, Monika A., Steinhilber, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10120511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37084097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10042-9
_version_ 1785029196210241536
author Luger, Tessy
Bonsch, Rosina
Seibt, Robert
Krämer, Bernhard
Rieger, Monika A.
Steinhilber, Benjamin
author_facet Luger, Tessy
Bonsch, Rosina
Seibt, Robert
Krämer, Bernhard
Rieger, Monika A.
Steinhilber, Benjamin
author_sort Luger, Tessy
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Investigate the effect of passive, active or no intra-operative work breaks on static, median and peak muscular activity, muscular fatigue, upper body postures, heart rate, and heart rate variability. BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic surgery is preferred over open surgery for the benefit of the patient, it puts the surgeons at higher risk for developing musculoskeletal disorders especially due to the less dynamic and awkward working posture. The organizational intervention intraoperative work break is a workplace strategy that has previously demonstrated positive effects in small-scale intervention studies. METHODS: Twenty-one surgeons were exposed to three 90-min conditions: no breaks, 2.5-min passive (standing rest) or active (targeted stretching and mobilization exercises) breaks after 30-min work blocks. Muscular activity and fatigue of back, shoulder and forearm muscles were assessed by surface electromyography; upper body posture, i.e., spinal curvature, by inclination sensors; and heart rate and variability (HRV) by electrocardiography. Generalized estimating equations were used for statistical analyses. This study (NCT03715816) was conducted from March 2019 to October 2020. RESULTS: The HRV-metric SDNN tended to be higher, but not statistically significantly, in the intervention conditions compared to the control condition. No statistically significant effects of both interventions were detected for muscular activity, joint angles or heart rate. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative work breaks, whether passive or active, may counteract shoulder muscular fatigue and increase heart rate variability. This tendency may play a role in a reduced risk for developing work-related musculoskeletal disorders and acute physical stress responses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-023-10042-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10120511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101205112023-04-24 Intraoperative active and passive breaks during minimally invasive surgery influence upper extremity physical strain and physical stress response—A controlled, randomized cross-over, laboratory trial Luger, Tessy Bonsch, Rosina Seibt, Robert Krämer, Bernhard Rieger, Monika A. Steinhilber, Benjamin Surg Endosc Article OBJECTIVE: Investigate the effect of passive, active or no intra-operative work breaks on static, median and peak muscular activity, muscular fatigue, upper body postures, heart rate, and heart rate variability. BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic surgery is preferred over open surgery for the benefit of the patient, it puts the surgeons at higher risk for developing musculoskeletal disorders especially due to the less dynamic and awkward working posture. The organizational intervention intraoperative work break is a workplace strategy that has previously demonstrated positive effects in small-scale intervention studies. METHODS: Twenty-one surgeons were exposed to three 90-min conditions: no breaks, 2.5-min passive (standing rest) or active (targeted stretching and mobilization exercises) breaks after 30-min work blocks. Muscular activity and fatigue of back, shoulder and forearm muscles were assessed by surface electromyography; upper body posture, i.e., spinal curvature, by inclination sensors; and heart rate and variability (HRV) by electrocardiography. Generalized estimating equations were used for statistical analyses. This study (NCT03715816) was conducted from March 2019 to October 2020. RESULTS: The HRV-metric SDNN tended to be higher, but not statistically significantly, in the intervention conditions compared to the control condition. No statistically significant effects of both interventions were detected for muscular activity, joint angles or heart rate. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative work breaks, whether passive or active, may counteract shoulder muscular fatigue and increase heart rate variability. This tendency may play a role in a reduced risk for developing work-related musculoskeletal disorders and acute physical stress responses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-023-10042-9. Springer US 2023-04-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10120511/ /pubmed/37084097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10042-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Luger, Tessy
Bonsch, Rosina
Seibt, Robert
Krämer, Bernhard
Rieger, Monika A.
Steinhilber, Benjamin
Intraoperative active and passive breaks during minimally invasive surgery influence upper extremity physical strain and physical stress response—A controlled, randomized cross-over, laboratory trial
title Intraoperative active and passive breaks during minimally invasive surgery influence upper extremity physical strain and physical stress response—A controlled, randomized cross-over, laboratory trial
title_full Intraoperative active and passive breaks during minimally invasive surgery influence upper extremity physical strain and physical stress response—A controlled, randomized cross-over, laboratory trial
title_fullStr Intraoperative active and passive breaks during minimally invasive surgery influence upper extremity physical strain and physical stress response—A controlled, randomized cross-over, laboratory trial
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative active and passive breaks during minimally invasive surgery influence upper extremity physical strain and physical stress response—A controlled, randomized cross-over, laboratory trial
title_short Intraoperative active and passive breaks during minimally invasive surgery influence upper extremity physical strain and physical stress response—A controlled, randomized cross-over, laboratory trial
title_sort intraoperative active and passive breaks during minimally invasive surgery influence upper extremity physical strain and physical stress response—a controlled, randomized cross-over, laboratory trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10120511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37084097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10042-9
work_keys_str_mv AT lugertessy intraoperativeactiveandpassivebreaksduringminimallyinvasivesurgeryinfluenceupperextremityphysicalstrainandphysicalstressresponseacontrolledrandomizedcrossoverlaboratorytrial
AT bonschrosina intraoperativeactiveandpassivebreaksduringminimallyinvasivesurgeryinfluenceupperextremityphysicalstrainandphysicalstressresponseacontrolledrandomizedcrossoverlaboratorytrial
AT seibtrobert intraoperativeactiveandpassivebreaksduringminimallyinvasivesurgeryinfluenceupperextremityphysicalstrainandphysicalstressresponseacontrolledrandomizedcrossoverlaboratorytrial
AT kramerbernhard intraoperativeactiveandpassivebreaksduringminimallyinvasivesurgeryinfluenceupperextremityphysicalstrainandphysicalstressresponseacontrolledrandomizedcrossoverlaboratorytrial
AT riegermonikaa intraoperativeactiveandpassivebreaksduringminimallyinvasivesurgeryinfluenceupperextremityphysicalstrainandphysicalstressresponseacontrolledrandomizedcrossoverlaboratorytrial
AT steinhilberbenjamin intraoperativeactiveandpassivebreaksduringminimallyinvasivesurgeryinfluenceupperextremityphysicalstrainandphysicalstressresponseacontrolledrandomizedcrossoverlaboratorytrial