Cargando…

Interictal MEG abnormalities to guide intracranial electrode implantation and predict surgical outcome

Intracranial EEG (iEEG) is the gold standard technique for epileptogenic zone (EZ) localisation, but requires a preconceived hypothesis of the location of the epileptogenic tissue. This placement is guided by qualitative interpretations of seizure semiology, MRI, EEG and other imaging modalities, su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Owen, Tom, Janiukstyte, Vytene, Hall, Gerard R., Chowdhury, Fahmida A., Diehl, Beate, McEvoy, Andrew, Miserocchi, Anna, de Tisi, Jane, Duncan, John S., Rugg-Gunn, Fergus, Wang, Yujiang, Taylor, Peter Neal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cornell University 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10120748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37090233
_version_ 1785029232787718144
author Owen, Tom
Janiukstyte, Vytene
Hall, Gerard R.
Chowdhury, Fahmida A.
Diehl, Beate
McEvoy, Andrew
Miserocchi, Anna
de Tisi, Jane
Duncan, John S.
Rugg-Gunn, Fergus
Wang, Yujiang
Taylor, Peter Neal
author_facet Owen, Tom
Janiukstyte, Vytene
Hall, Gerard R.
Chowdhury, Fahmida A.
Diehl, Beate
McEvoy, Andrew
Miserocchi, Anna
de Tisi, Jane
Duncan, John S.
Rugg-Gunn, Fergus
Wang, Yujiang
Taylor, Peter Neal
author_sort Owen, Tom
collection PubMed
description Intracranial EEG (iEEG) is the gold standard technique for epileptogenic zone (EZ) localisation, but requires a preconceived hypothesis of the location of the epileptogenic tissue. This placement is guided by qualitative interpretations of seizure semiology, MRI, EEG and other imaging modalities, such as magnetoencephalography (MEG). Quantitative abnormality mapping using MEG has recently been shown to have potential clinical value. We hypothesised that if quantifiable MEG abnormalities were sampled by iEEG, then patients’ post-resection seizure outcome may be better. Thirty-two individuals with refractory neocortical epilepsy underwent MEG and subsequent iEEG recordings as part of pre-surgical evaluation. Eyes-closed resting-state interictal MEG band power abnormality maps were derived from 70 healthy controls as a normative baseline. MEG abnormality maps were compared to iEEG electrode implantation, with the spatial overlap of iEEG electrode placement and cerebral MEG abnormalities recorded. Finally, we assessed if the implantation of electrodes in abnormal tissue, and subsequent resection of the strongest abnormalities determined by MEG and iEEG corresponded to surgical success. Intracranial electrodes were implanted in brain tissue with the most abnormal MEG findings - in individuals that were seizure-free post-operatively (T=3.9, p=0.003), but not in those who did not become seizure free. The overlap between MEG abnormalities and electrode placement distinguished surgical outcome groups moderately well (AUC=0.68). In isolation, the resection of the strongest abnormalities as defined by MEG and iEEG separated surgical outcome groups well, AUC=0.71, AUC=0.74 respectively. A model incorporating all three features separated surgical outcome groups best (AUC=0.80). Intracranial EEG is a key tool to delineate the EZ and help render individuals seizure-free post-operatively. We showed that data-driven abnormality maps derived from resting-state MEG recordings demonstrate clinical value and may help guide electrode placement in individuals with neocortical epilepsy. Additionally, our predictive model of post-operative seizure-freedom, which leverages both MEG and iEEG recordings, could aid patient counselling of expected outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10120748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cornell University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101207482023-04-22 Interictal MEG abnormalities to guide intracranial electrode implantation and predict surgical outcome Owen, Tom Janiukstyte, Vytene Hall, Gerard R. Chowdhury, Fahmida A. Diehl, Beate McEvoy, Andrew Miserocchi, Anna de Tisi, Jane Duncan, John S. Rugg-Gunn, Fergus Wang, Yujiang Taylor, Peter Neal ArXiv Article Intracranial EEG (iEEG) is the gold standard technique for epileptogenic zone (EZ) localisation, but requires a preconceived hypothesis of the location of the epileptogenic tissue. This placement is guided by qualitative interpretations of seizure semiology, MRI, EEG and other imaging modalities, such as magnetoencephalography (MEG). Quantitative abnormality mapping using MEG has recently been shown to have potential clinical value. We hypothesised that if quantifiable MEG abnormalities were sampled by iEEG, then patients’ post-resection seizure outcome may be better. Thirty-two individuals with refractory neocortical epilepsy underwent MEG and subsequent iEEG recordings as part of pre-surgical evaluation. Eyes-closed resting-state interictal MEG band power abnormality maps were derived from 70 healthy controls as a normative baseline. MEG abnormality maps were compared to iEEG electrode implantation, with the spatial overlap of iEEG electrode placement and cerebral MEG abnormalities recorded. Finally, we assessed if the implantation of electrodes in abnormal tissue, and subsequent resection of the strongest abnormalities determined by MEG and iEEG corresponded to surgical success. Intracranial electrodes were implanted in brain tissue with the most abnormal MEG findings - in individuals that were seizure-free post-operatively (T=3.9, p=0.003), but not in those who did not become seizure free. The overlap between MEG abnormalities and electrode placement distinguished surgical outcome groups moderately well (AUC=0.68). In isolation, the resection of the strongest abnormalities as defined by MEG and iEEG separated surgical outcome groups well, AUC=0.71, AUC=0.74 respectively. A model incorporating all three features separated surgical outcome groups best (AUC=0.80). Intracranial EEG is a key tool to delineate the EZ and help render individuals seizure-free post-operatively. We showed that data-driven abnormality maps derived from resting-state MEG recordings demonstrate clinical value and may help guide electrode placement in individuals with neocortical epilepsy. Additionally, our predictive model of post-operative seizure-freedom, which leverages both MEG and iEEG recordings, could aid patient counselling of expected outcome. Cornell University 2023-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10120748/ /pubmed/37090233 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.
spellingShingle Article
Owen, Tom
Janiukstyte, Vytene
Hall, Gerard R.
Chowdhury, Fahmida A.
Diehl, Beate
McEvoy, Andrew
Miserocchi, Anna
de Tisi, Jane
Duncan, John S.
Rugg-Gunn, Fergus
Wang, Yujiang
Taylor, Peter Neal
Interictal MEG abnormalities to guide intracranial electrode implantation and predict surgical outcome
title Interictal MEG abnormalities to guide intracranial electrode implantation and predict surgical outcome
title_full Interictal MEG abnormalities to guide intracranial electrode implantation and predict surgical outcome
title_fullStr Interictal MEG abnormalities to guide intracranial electrode implantation and predict surgical outcome
title_full_unstemmed Interictal MEG abnormalities to guide intracranial electrode implantation and predict surgical outcome
title_short Interictal MEG abnormalities to guide intracranial electrode implantation and predict surgical outcome
title_sort interictal meg abnormalities to guide intracranial electrode implantation and predict surgical outcome
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10120748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37090233
work_keys_str_mv AT owentom interictalmegabnormalitiestoguideintracranialelectrodeimplantationandpredictsurgicaloutcome
AT janiukstytevytene interictalmegabnormalitiestoguideintracranialelectrodeimplantationandpredictsurgicaloutcome
AT hallgerardr interictalmegabnormalitiestoguideintracranialelectrodeimplantationandpredictsurgicaloutcome
AT chowdhuryfahmidaa interictalmegabnormalitiestoguideintracranialelectrodeimplantationandpredictsurgicaloutcome
AT diehlbeate interictalmegabnormalitiestoguideintracranialelectrodeimplantationandpredictsurgicaloutcome
AT mcevoyandrew interictalmegabnormalitiestoguideintracranialelectrodeimplantationandpredictsurgicaloutcome
AT miserocchianna interictalmegabnormalitiestoguideintracranialelectrodeimplantationandpredictsurgicaloutcome
AT detisijane interictalmegabnormalitiestoguideintracranialelectrodeimplantationandpredictsurgicaloutcome
AT duncanjohns interictalmegabnormalitiestoguideintracranialelectrodeimplantationandpredictsurgicaloutcome
AT rugggunnfergus interictalmegabnormalitiestoguideintracranialelectrodeimplantationandpredictsurgicaloutcome
AT wangyujiang interictalmegabnormalitiestoguideintracranialelectrodeimplantationandpredictsurgicaloutcome
AT taylorpeterneal interictalmegabnormalitiestoguideintracranialelectrodeimplantationandpredictsurgicaloutcome