Cargando…

COVID-19 pandemic and neonatal birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: Lockdown was implemented in many countries during the pandemic, which led to myriad changes in pregnant women's lives. However, the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on neonatal outcomes remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the association between the pandemic and neonatal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yao, X.D., Li, Y., Jiang, H., Ma, J., Wen, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10121139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37201437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2023.04.009
_version_ 1785029318845399040
author Yao, X.D.
Li, Y.
Jiang, H.
Ma, J.
Wen, J.
author_facet Yao, X.D.
Li, Y.
Jiang, H.
Ma, J.
Wen, J.
author_sort Yao, X.D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Lockdown was implemented in many countries during the pandemic, which led to myriad changes in pregnant women's lives. However, the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on neonatal outcomes remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the association between the pandemic and neonatal birth weight. STUDY DESIGN: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of the previous literature. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE and Embase databases up to May 2022 and extracted 36 eligible studies that compared neonatal birth weight between the pandemic and the prepandemic period. The following outcomes were included: mean birth weight, low birth weight (LBW), very low birth weight (VLBW), macrosomia, small for gestational age (SGA), very small for gestational age (VSGA), and large for gestational age (LGA). Statistical heterogeneity among studies was assessed to determine whether a random effects model or fixed effects model was conducted. RESULTS: Of the 4514 studies identified, 36 articles were eligible for inclusion. A total of 1,883,936 neonates during the pandemic and 4,667,133 neonates during the prepandemic were reported. We identified a significant increase in mean birth weight (pooled mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 15.06 [10.36, 19.76], I(2) = 0.0%, 12 studies) and a reduction in VLBW (pooled OR [95% CI] = 0.86 [0.77, 0.97], I(2) = 55.4%, 12 studies). No overall effect was identified for other outcomes: LBW, macrosomia, SGA, VSGA, and LGA. There was publication bias for mean birth weight with a borderline significance (Egger's P = 0.050). CONCLUSION: Pooled results showed the pandemic was significantly associated with an increase in mean birth weight and a reduction in VLBW, but not for other outcomes. This review provided clues about the indirect effects of the pandemic on neonatal birth weight and more healthcare measures needed to improve neonatal long-term health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10121139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101211392023-04-24 COVID-19 pandemic and neonatal birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis Yao, X.D. Li, Y. Jiang, H. Ma, J. Wen, J. Public Health Review Paper OBJECTIVES: Lockdown was implemented in many countries during the pandemic, which led to myriad changes in pregnant women's lives. However, the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on neonatal outcomes remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the association between the pandemic and neonatal birth weight. STUDY DESIGN: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of the previous literature. METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE and Embase databases up to May 2022 and extracted 36 eligible studies that compared neonatal birth weight between the pandemic and the prepandemic period. The following outcomes were included: mean birth weight, low birth weight (LBW), very low birth weight (VLBW), macrosomia, small for gestational age (SGA), very small for gestational age (VSGA), and large for gestational age (LGA). Statistical heterogeneity among studies was assessed to determine whether a random effects model or fixed effects model was conducted. RESULTS: Of the 4514 studies identified, 36 articles were eligible for inclusion. A total of 1,883,936 neonates during the pandemic and 4,667,133 neonates during the prepandemic were reported. We identified a significant increase in mean birth weight (pooled mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 15.06 [10.36, 19.76], I(2) = 0.0%, 12 studies) and a reduction in VLBW (pooled OR [95% CI] = 0.86 [0.77, 0.97], I(2) = 55.4%, 12 studies). No overall effect was identified for other outcomes: LBW, macrosomia, SGA, VSGA, and LGA. There was publication bias for mean birth weight with a borderline significance (Egger's P = 0.050). CONCLUSION: Pooled results showed the pandemic was significantly associated with an increase in mean birth weight and a reduction in VLBW, but not for other outcomes. This review provided clues about the indirect effects of the pandemic on neonatal birth weight and more healthcare measures needed to improve neonatal long-term health. The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2023-07 2023-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10121139/ /pubmed/37201437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2023.04.009 Text en © 2023 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Review Paper
Yao, X.D.
Li, Y.
Jiang, H.
Ma, J.
Wen, J.
COVID-19 pandemic and neonatal birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title COVID-19 pandemic and neonatal birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full COVID-19 pandemic and neonatal birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr COVID-19 pandemic and neonatal birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 pandemic and neonatal birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short COVID-19 pandemic and neonatal birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort covid-19 pandemic and neonatal birth weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10121139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37201437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2023.04.009
work_keys_str_mv AT yaoxd covid19pandemicandneonatalbirthweightasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liy covid19pandemicandneonatalbirthweightasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiangh covid19pandemicandneonatalbirthweightasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maj covid19pandemicandneonatalbirthweightasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wenj covid19pandemicandneonatalbirthweightasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis