Cargando…

TMS-evoked responses are driven by recurrent large-scale network dynamics

A compelling way to disentangle the complexity of the brain is to measure the effects of spatially and temporally synchronized systematic perturbations. In humans, this can be non-invasively achieved by combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG). Spatiotempora...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Momi, Davide, Wang, Zheng, Griffiths, John D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10121222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37083491
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83232
_version_ 1785029335676092416
author Momi, Davide
Wang, Zheng
Griffiths, John D
author_facet Momi, Davide
Wang, Zheng
Griffiths, John D
author_sort Momi, Davide
collection PubMed
description A compelling way to disentangle the complexity of the brain is to measure the effects of spatially and temporally synchronized systematic perturbations. In humans, this can be non-invasively achieved by combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG). Spatiotemporally complex and long-lasting TMS-EEG evoked potential (TEP) waveforms are believed to result from recurrent, re-entrant activity that propagates broadly across multiple cortical and subcortical regions, dispersing from and later re-converging on, the primary stimulation site. However, if we loosely understand the TEP of a TMS-stimulated region as the impulse response function of a noisy underdamped harmonic oscillator, then multiple later activity components (waveform peaks) should be expected even for an isolated network node in the complete absence of recurrent inputs. Thus emerges a critically important question for basic and clinical research on human brain dynamics: what parts of the TEP are due to purely local dynamics, what parts are due to reverberant, re-entrant network activity, and how can we distinguish between the two? To disentangle this, we used source-localized TMS-EEG analyses and whole-brain connectome-based computational modelling. Results indicated that recurrent network feedback begins to drive TEP responses from 100 ms post-stimulation, with earlier TEP components being attributable to local reverberatory activity within the stimulated region. Subject-specific estimation of neurophysiological parameters additionally indicated an important role for inhibitory GABAergic neural populations in scaling cortical excitability levels, as reflected in TEP waveform characteristics. The novel discoveries and new software technologies introduced here should be of broad utility in basic and clinical neuroscience research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10121222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101212222023-04-22 TMS-evoked responses are driven by recurrent large-scale network dynamics Momi, Davide Wang, Zheng Griffiths, John D eLife Neuroscience A compelling way to disentangle the complexity of the brain is to measure the effects of spatially and temporally synchronized systematic perturbations. In humans, this can be non-invasively achieved by combining transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG). Spatiotemporally complex and long-lasting TMS-EEG evoked potential (TEP) waveforms are believed to result from recurrent, re-entrant activity that propagates broadly across multiple cortical and subcortical regions, dispersing from and later re-converging on, the primary stimulation site. However, if we loosely understand the TEP of a TMS-stimulated region as the impulse response function of a noisy underdamped harmonic oscillator, then multiple later activity components (waveform peaks) should be expected even for an isolated network node in the complete absence of recurrent inputs. Thus emerges a critically important question for basic and clinical research on human brain dynamics: what parts of the TEP are due to purely local dynamics, what parts are due to reverberant, re-entrant network activity, and how can we distinguish between the two? To disentangle this, we used source-localized TMS-EEG analyses and whole-brain connectome-based computational modelling. Results indicated that recurrent network feedback begins to drive TEP responses from 100 ms post-stimulation, with earlier TEP components being attributable to local reverberatory activity within the stimulated region. Subject-specific estimation of neurophysiological parameters additionally indicated an important role for inhibitory GABAergic neural populations in scaling cortical excitability levels, as reflected in TEP waveform characteristics. The novel discoveries and new software technologies introduced here should be of broad utility in basic and clinical neuroscience research. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2023-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10121222/ /pubmed/37083491 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83232 Text en © 2023, Momi, Wang et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Momi, Davide
Wang, Zheng
Griffiths, John D
TMS-evoked responses are driven by recurrent large-scale network dynamics
title TMS-evoked responses are driven by recurrent large-scale network dynamics
title_full TMS-evoked responses are driven by recurrent large-scale network dynamics
title_fullStr TMS-evoked responses are driven by recurrent large-scale network dynamics
title_full_unstemmed TMS-evoked responses are driven by recurrent large-scale network dynamics
title_short TMS-evoked responses are driven by recurrent large-scale network dynamics
title_sort tms-evoked responses are driven by recurrent large-scale network dynamics
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10121222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37083491
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83232
work_keys_str_mv AT momidavide tmsevokedresponsesaredrivenbyrecurrentlargescalenetworkdynamics
AT wangzheng tmsevokedresponsesaredrivenbyrecurrentlargescalenetworkdynamics
AT griffithsjohnd tmsevokedresponsesaredrivenbyrecurrentlargescalenetworkdynamics