Cargando…
Startle-triggered responses indicate reticulospinal drive is larger for voluntary shoulder versus finger movements
Recent primate studies have implicated a substantial role of reticulospinal pathways in the production of various voluntary movements. A novel way to assess the relative reticulospinal contributions in humans is through the use of a “StartReact” paradigm where a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS) is...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10121700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37085607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33493-5 |
_version_ | 1785029422929149952 |
---|---|
author | Maslovat, Dana Santangelo, Cassandra M. Carlsen, Anthony N. |
author_facet | Maslovat, Dana Santangelo, Cassandra M. Carlsen, Anthony N. |
author_sort | Maslovat, Dana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent primate studies have implicated a substantial role of reticulospinal pathways in the production of various voluntary movements. A novel way to assess the relative reticulospinal contributions in humans is through the use of a “StartReact” paradigm where a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS) is presented during a simple reaction time (RT) task. The StartReact response is characterized by short-latency triggering of a prepared response, which is attributed to increased reticulospinal drive associated with startle reflex activation. The current study used a StartReact protocol to examine differences in reticulospinal contributions between proximal and distal effectors by examining EMG onset latencies in lateral deltoid and first dorsal interosseous during bilateral shoulder or finger abduction. The magnitude of the StartReact effect, and thus relative reticulospinal drive, was quantified as the difference in RT between startle trials in which startle-reflex related EMG activation in the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) was present (SCM +) versus absent (SCM −). A significantly larger StartReact effect was observed for bilateral shoulder abduction versus bimanual finger abduction and a higher incidence of SCM + trials occurred in the proximal task. Additionally, both startle reflex and response-related EMG measures were larger on SCM + trials for the shoulder versus finger task. These results provide compelling novel evidence for increased reticulospinal activation in bilateral proximal upper-limb movements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10121700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101217002023-04-23 Startle-triggered responses indicate reticulospinal drive is larger for voluntary shoulder versus finger movements Maslovat, Dana Santangelo, Cassandra M. Carlsen, Anthony N. Sci Rep Article Recent primate studies have implicated a substantial role of reticulospinal pathways in the production of various voluntary movements. A novel way to assess the relative reticulospinal contributions in humans is through the use of a “StartReact” paradigm where a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS) is presented during a simple reaction time (RT) task. The StartReact response is characterized by short-latency triggering of a prepared response, which is attributed to increased reticulospinal drive associated with startle reflex activation. The current study used a StartReact protocol to examine differences in reticulospinal contributions between proximal and distal effectors by examining EMG onset latencies in lateral deltoid and first dorsal interosseous during bilateral shoulder or finger abduction. The magnitude of the StartReact effect, and thus relative reticulospinal drive, was quantified as the difference in RT between startle trials in which startle-reflex related EMG activation in the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) was present (SCM +) versus absent (SCM −). A significantly larger StartReact effect was observed for bilateral shoulder abduction versus bimanual finger abduction and a higher incidence of SCM + trials occurred in the proximal task. Additionally, both startle reflex and response-related EMG measures were larger on SCM + trials for the shoulder versus finger task. These results provide compelling novel evidence for increased reticulospinal activation in bilateral proximal upper-limb movements. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10121700/ /pubmed/37085607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33493-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Maslovat, Dana Santangelo, Cassandra M. Carlsen, Anthony N. Startle-triggered responses indicate reticulospinal drive is larger for voluntary shoulder versus finger movements |
title | Startle-triggered responses indicate reticulospinal drive is larger for voluntary shoulder versus finger movements |
title_full | Startle-triggered responses indicate reticulospinal drive is larger for voluntary shoulder versus finger movements |
title_fullStr | Startle-triggered responses indicate reticulospinal drive is larger for voluntary shoulder versus finger movements |
title_full_unstemmed | Startle-triggered responses indicate reticulospinal drive is larger for voluntary shoulder versus finger movements |
title_short | Startle-triggered responses indicate reticulospinal drive is larger for voluntary shoulder versus finger movements |
title_sort | startle-triggered responses indicate reticulospinal drive is larger for voluntary shoulder versus finger movements |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10121700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37085607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33493-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maslovatdana startletriggeredresponsesindicatereticulospinaldriveislargerforvoluntaryshoulderversusfingermovements AT santangelocassandram startletriggeredresponsesindicatereticulospinaldriveislargerforvoluntaryshoulderversusfingermovements AT carlsenanthonyn startletriggeredresponsesindicatereticulospinaldriveislargerforvoluntaryshoulderversusfingermovements |