Cargando…

Glibenclamide Posttreatment Does Not Inhibit Levcromakalim Induced Headache in Healthy Participants: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Intravenous infusion of ATP-sensitive potassium channel (K(ATP)) opener levcromakalim causes headache in humans and implicates K(ATP) channels in headache pathophysiology. Whether K(ATP) channel blocker glibenclamide inhibits levcromakalim-induced headache has not yet been elucidated. We aimed to in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kokoti, Lili, Al-Karagholi, Mohammad Al-Mahdi, Waldorff Nielsen, Cherie Amalie, Ashina, Messoud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10121935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36763326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13311-023-01350-y
Descripción
Sumario:Intravenous infusion of ATP-sensitive potassium channel (K(ATP)) opener levcromakalim causes headache in humans and implicates K(ATP) channels in headache pathophysiology. Whether K(ATP) channel blocker glibenclamide inhibits levcromakalim-induced headache has not yet been elucidated. We aimed to investigate the effect of posttreatment with glibenclamide on levcromakalim-induced headache in healthy participants. In a double blind, randomized, three-arm, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 20 healthy participants were randomized to receive 20 mL of levcromakalim (0.05 mg/min (50 mg/mL)) or 20 mL placebo (isotonic saline) intravenously over 20 min followed by oral administration of 10 mg glibenclamide or placebo. Fifteen participants completed all three study days. The primary endpoint was the difference in incidence of headache (0–12 h) between glibenclamide and placebo. More participants developed headache on levcromakalim-placebo day (15/15, 100%) (P = 0.013) and levcromakalim-glibenclamide day (13/15, 86%) compared to placebo-placebo day (7/15, 46%) (P = 0.041). We found no difference in headache incidence between levcromakalim-placebo day and levcromakalim-glibenclamide day (P = 0.479). The AUC(0–12 h) for headache intensity was significantly larger in levcromakalim-placebo day and levcromakalim-glibenclamide day compared to placebo-placebo day (106.3 ± 215.8) (P < 0.01). There was no difference in the AUC(0–12 h) for headache intensity between the levcromakalim-placebo day (494 ± 336.6) and the levcromakalim-glibenclamide day (417 ± 371.6) (P = 0.836). We conclude that non-specific K(ATP) channel inhibitor glibenclamide did not attenuate levcromakalim-induced headache in healthy volunteers. Future studies should clarify the involvement of the distinct isoforms of sulfonylurea receptor subunits of K(ATP) channels in the pathogenesis of headache and migraine. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13311-023-01350-y.