Cargando…

Using interleaved stimulation and EEG to measure temporal smoothing and growth of the sustained neural response to cochlear-implant stimulation

Two EEG experiments measured the sustained neural response to amplitude-modulated (AM) high-rate pulse trains presented to a single cochlear-implant (CI) electrode. Stimuli consisted of two interleaved pulse trains with AM rates F1 and F2 close to 80 and 120 Hz respectively, and where F2=1.5F1. Foll...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guérit, François, Deeks, John M., Arzounian, Dorothée, Gransier, Robin, Wouters, Jan, Carlyon, Robert P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10121955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36754938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-023-00886-2
_version_ 1785029429459681280
author Guérit, François
Deeks, John M.
Arzounian, Dorothée
Gransier, Robin
Wouters, Jan
Carlyon, Robert P.
author_facet Guérit, François
Deeks, John M.
Arzounian, Dorothée
Gransier, Robin
Wouters, Jan
Carlyon, Robert P.
author_sort Guérit, François
collection PubMed
description Two EEG experiments measured the sustained neural response to amplitude-modulated (AM) high-rate pulse trains presented to a single cochlear-implant (CI) electrode. Stimuli consisted of two interleaved pulse trains with AM rates F1 and F2 close to 80 and 120 Hz respectively, and where F2=1.5F1. Following Carlyon et al. (2021) we assume that such stimuli can produce a Neural Distortion Response (NDR) at F0 = F2-F1 Hz if temporal dependencies (“smoothing”) in the auditory system are followed by one or more neural nonlinearities. In experiment 1 the rate of each pulse train was 480 pps and the gap between pulses in the F1 and F2 pulse trains ranged from 0 to 984 μs. The NDR had a roughly constant amplitude for gaps between 0 and about 200-400 μs, and decreased for longer gaps. We argue that this result is consistent with a temporal dependency, such as facilitation, operating at the level of the auditory nerve and/or with co-incidence detection by cochlear-nucleus neurons. Experiment 2 first measured the NDR for stimuli at each listener’s most comfortable level (“MCL”) and for F0 = 37, 40, and 43 Hz. This revealed a group delay of about 42 ms, consistent with a thalamic/cortical source. We then showed that the NDR grew steeply with stimulus amplitude and, for most listeners, decreased by more than 12 dB between MCL and 75% of the listener’s dynamic range. We argue that the NDR is a potentially useful objective estimate of MCL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10121955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101219552023-04-24 Using interleaved stimulation and EEG to measure temporal smoothing and growth of the sustained neural response to cochlear-implant stimulation Guérit, François Deeks, John M. Arzounian, Dorothée Gransier, Robin Wouters, Jan Carlyon, Robert P. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol Article Two EEG experiments measured the sustained neural response to amplitude-modulated (AM) high-rate pulse trains presented to a single cochlear-implant (CI) electrode. Stimuli consisted of two interleaved pulse trains with AM rates F1 and F2 close to 80 and 120 Hz respectively, and where F2=1.5F1. Following Carlyon et al. (2021) we assume that such stimuli can produce a Neural Distortion Response (NDR) at F0 = F2-F1 Hz if temporal dependencies (“smoothing”) in the auditory system are followed by one or more neural nonlinearities. In experiment 1 the rate of each pulse train was 480 pps and the gap between pulses in the F1 and F2 pulse trains ranged from 0 to 984 μs. The NDR had a roughly constant amplitude for gaps between 0 and about 200-400 μs, and decreased for longer gaps. We argue that this result is consistent with a temporal dependency, such as facilitation, operating at the level of the auditory nerve and/or with co-incidence detection by cochlear-nucleus neurons. Experiment 2 first measured the NDR for stimuli at each listener’s most comfortable level (“MCL”) and for F0 = 37, 40, and 43 Hz. This revealed a group delay of about 42 ms, consistent with a thalamic/cortical source. We then showed that the NDR grew steeply with stimulus amplitude and, for most listeners, decreased by more than 12 dB between MCL and 75% of the listener’s dynamic range. We argue that the NDR is a potentially useful objective estimate of MCL. 2023-02-08 2023-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10121955/ /pubmed/36754938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-023-00886-2 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) International license.
spellingShingle Article
Guérit, François
Deeks, John M.
Arzounian, Dorothée
Gransier, Robin
Wouters, Jan
Carlyon, Robert P.
Using interleaved stimulation and EEG to measure temporal smoothing and growth of the sustained neural response to cochlear-implant stimulation
title Using interleaved stimulation and EEG to measure temporal smoothing and growth of the sustained neural response to cochlear-implant stimulation
title_full Using interleaved stimulation and EEG to measure temporal smoothing and growth of the sustained neural response to cochlear-implant stimulation
title_fullStr Using interleaved stimulation and EEG to measure temporal smoothing and growth of the sustained neural response to cochlear-implant stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Using interleaved stimulation and EEG to measure temporal smoothing and growth of the sustained neural response to cochlear-implant stimulation
title_short Using interleaved stimulation and EEG to measure temporal smoothing and growth of the sustained neural response to cochlear-implant stimulation
title_sort using interleaved stimulation and eeg to measure temporal smoothing and growth of the sustained neural response to cochlear-implant stimulation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10121955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36754938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10162-023-00886-2
work_keys_str_mv AT gueritfrancois usinginterleavedstimulationandeegtomeasuretemporalsmoothingandgrowthofthesustainedneuralresponsetocochlearimplantstimulation
AT deeksjohnm usinginterleavedstimulationandeegtomeasuretemporalsmoothingandgrowthofthesustainedneuralresponsetocochlearimplantstimulation
AT arzouniandorothee usinginterleavedstimulationandeegtomeasuretemporalsmoothingandgrowthofthesustainedneuralresponsetocochlearimplantstimulation
AT gransierrobin usinginterleavedstimulationandeegtomeasuretemporalsmoothingandgrowthofthesustainedneuralresponsetocochlearimplantstimulation
AT woutersjan usinginterleavedstimulationandeegtomeasuretemporalsmoothingandgrowthofthesustainedneuralresponsetocochlearimplantstimulation
AT carlyonrobertp usinginterleavedstimulationandeegtomeasuretemporalsmoothingandgrowthofthesustainedneuralresponsetocochlearimplantstimulation