Cargando…
Evaluation of Financial Conflicts of Interest and Quality of Evidence Underlying the American Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines: The Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, 2021
Background: Clinical practice guidelines make recommendations based on the best available evidence. Proper management and disclosure of financial conflicts of interest (FCOIs) are necessary for trustworthy clinical practice guidelines. This study evaluated the prevalence of FCOIs and quality of evid...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10122171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37095789 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36567 |
_version_ | 1785029442112847872 |
---|---|
author | Shigeta, Haruki Murayama, Anju Kamamoto, Sae Saito, Hiroaki Ozaki, Akihiko |
author_facet | Shigeta, Haruki Murayama, Anju Kamamoto, Sae Saito, Hiroaki Ozaki, Akihiko |
author_sort | Shigeta, Haruki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Clinical practice guidelines make recommendations based on the best available evidence. Proper management and disclosure of financial conflicts of interest (FCOIs) are necessary for trustworthy clinical practice guidelines. This study evaluated the prevalence of FCOIs and quality of evidence underlying the American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines. Methods: Using the Open Payments Database (OPD) between 2018 and 2020, we examined the research and general payments to all authors of the Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, 2021. The quality of evidence and tone of recommendations were assessed and the associations between the two were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. Results: Of the 25 guideline authors, 15 (60.0%) were United States (US)-based physicians eligible for the OPD search. Eight (32.0%) and 12 (48.0%) received one or more industry payments one year and three years prior to the guideline publication, respectively. The median total payments (interquartile range) per author were $33,262 ($4,638‒$101,271) in 2020 and $18,053 ($2,529‒$220,659) in 2018-2020. One author received a research payment of over $10,000 undeclared. Of 471 recommendations, 61 (13.0%) and 97 (20.6%) were supported by low-quality evidence and expert opinions, respectively. Also, 439 (93.2%) recommendations had a positive tone. The lower quality of evidence tended to recommend positively with an odds ratio of 1.56 (95% confidence interval: 0.96-2.56, p=0.075) without reaching statistical significance. Conclusion: A minority of the guideline authors received industry payments from the healthcare industry, and declared FCOIs were mostly accurate. However, the ADA FCOI policy required the guideline authors to declare their FCOIs for one year before publication. A more transparent and rigorous FCOI policy is needed in the ADA guidelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10122171 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101221712023-04-23 Evaluation of Financial Conflicts of Interest and Quality of Evidence Underlying the American Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines: The Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, 2021 Shigeta, Haruki Murayama, Anju Kamamoto, Sae Saito, Hiroaki Ozaki, Akihiko Cureus Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism Background: Clinical practice guidelines make recommendations based on the best available evidence. Proper management and disclosure of financial conflicts of interest (FCOIs) are necessary for trustworthy clinical practice guidelines. This study evaluated the prevalence of FCOIs and quality of evidence underlying the American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines. Methods: Using the Open Payments Database (OPD) between 2018 and 2020, we examined the research and general payments to all authors of the Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, 2021. The quality of evidence and tone of recommendations were assessed and the associations between the two were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. Results: Of the 25 guideline authors, 15 (60.0%) were United States (US)-based physicians eligible for the OPD search. Eight (32.0%) and 12 (48.0%) received one or more industry payments one year and three years prior to the guideline publication, respectively. The median total payments (interquartile range) per author were $33,262 ($4,638‒$101,271) in 2020 and $18,053 ($2,529‒$220,659) in 2018-2020. One author received a research payment of over $10,000 undeclared. Of 471 recommendations, 61 (13.0%) and 97 (20.6%) were supported by low-quality evidence and expert opinions, respectively. Also, 439 (93.2%) recommendations had a positive tone. The lower quality of evidence tended to recommend positively with an odds ratio of 1.56 (95% confidence interval: 0.96-2.56, p=0.075) without reaching statistical significance. Conclusion: A minority of the guideline authors received industry payments from the healthcare industry, and declared FCOIs were mostly accurate. However, the ADA FCOI policy required the guideline authors to declare their FCOIs for one year before publication. A more transparent and rigorous FCOI policy is needed in the ADA guidelines. Cureus 2023-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10122171/ /pubmed/37095789 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36567 Text en Copyright © 2023, Shigeta et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism Shigeta, Haruki Murayama, Anju Kamamoto, Sae Saito, Hiroaki Ozaki, Akihiko Evaluation of Financial Conflicts of Interest and Quality of Evidence Underlying the American Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines: The Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, 2021 |
title | Evaluation of Financial Conflicts of Interest and Quality of Evidence Underlying the American Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines: The Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, 2021 |
title_full | Evaluation of Financial Conflicts of Interest and Quality of Evidence Underlying the American Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines: The Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, 2021 |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Financial Conflicts of Interest and Quality of Evidence Underlying the American Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines: The Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, 2021 |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Financial Conflicts of Interest and Quality of Evidence Underlying the American Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines: The Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, 2021 |
title_short | Evaluation of Financial Conflicts of Interest and Quality of Evidence Underlying the American Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines: The Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, 2021 |
title_sort | evaluation of financial conflicts of interest and quality of evidence underlying the american diabetes association clinical practice guidelines: the standards of medical care in diabetes, 2021 |
topic | Endocrinology/Diabetes/Metabolism |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10122171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37095789 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36567 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shigetaharuki evaluationoffinancialconflictsofinterestandqualityofevidenceunderlyingtheamericandiabetesassociationclinicalpracticeguidelinesthestandardsofmedicalcareindiabetes2021 AT murayamaanju evaluationoffinancialconflictsofinterestandqualityofevidenceunderlyingtheamericandiabetesassociationclinicalpracticeguidelinesthestandardsofmedicalcareindiabetes2021 AT kamamotosae evaluationoffinancialconflictsofinterestandqualityofevidenceunderlyingtheamericandiabetesassociationclinicalpracticeguidelinesthestandardsofmedicalcareindiabetes2021 AT saitohiroaki evaluationoffinancialconflictsofinterestandqualityofevidenceunderlyingtheamericandiabetesassociationclinicalpracticeguidelinesthestandardsofmedicalcareindiabetes2021 AT ozakiakihiko evaluationoffinancialconflictsofinterestandqualityofevidenceunderlyingtheamericandiabetesassociationclinicalpracticeguidelinesthestandardsofmedicalcareindiabetes2021 |