Cargando…
How do women comply with cancer screenings? A study in four regions of France
BACKGROUND: This article looks at the behaviour of women facing different cancer screening options available to them from the age of 50 onward. The study was conducted in 2019 in four departments of the French territory with the objective of identifying the factors that influence acceptance of a pop...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10122322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37085818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02311-5 |
_version_ | 1785029469277257728 |
---|---|
author | Duchange, Nathalie Poiseuil, Marie Rollet, Quentin Piette, Christine Cosson, Mathilde Quertier, Marie-Christine Moutel, Grégoire Darquy, Sylviane |
author_facet | Duchange, Nathalie Poiseuil, Marie Rollet, Quentin Piette, Christine Cosson, Mathilde Quertier, Marie-Christine Moutel, Grégoire Darquy, Sylviane |
author_sort | Duchange, Nathalie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This article looks at the behaviour of women facing different cancer screening options available to them from the age of 50 onward. The study was conducted in 2019 in four departments of the French territory with the objective of identifying the factors that influence acceptance of a population-based screening proposal. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to women who had received three invitations to organised screenings (OS) for both breast and colorectal cancer. The categories of participants in both OS were designed from data from the regional cancer screening coordination centres in each department. Participation in opportunistic cervical cancer screening was evaluated as self-reported data. RESULTS: 4,634 questionnaires were returned out of the 17,194 sent, giving a global return rate of 27%. The highest rate of return (73.5%) was obtained from women who had participated at least once in both breast and colorectal cancer OS. An intermediate rate was obtained from women participating in breast cancer OS only (18.7%). Poor levels of return came from women who had participated in colorectal cancer OS only (3.6%) and from non-participants (4.1%). Our results suggest that women with lower educational levels tend to be the most regular attendants at OS (50.3%), compared to highly educated women (39.7%). 11.8% of women were overdue in their opportunistic cervical cancer screening. This percentage rose to 35.4% in the category of non-participants. In addition, women’s comments provide a better understanding of the reasons for irregular attendance and non-participation. CONCLUSION: Overall, similar behaviours towards screening were observed in the four departments. Our analysis suggests that participation in one cancer OS increases the likelihood of participating in others. This adhesion could be an interesting lever for raising women’s awareness of other cancer screenings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-023-02311-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10122322 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101223222023-04-23 How do women comply with cancer screenings? A study in four regions of France Duchange, Nathalie Poiseuil, Marie Rollet, Quentin Piette, Christine Cosson, Mathilde Quertier, Marie-Christine Moutel, Grégoire Darquy, Sylviane BMC Womens Health Research BACKGROUND: This article looks at the behaviour of women facing different cancer screening options available to them from the age of 50 onward. The study was conducted in 2019 in four departments of the French territory with the objective of identifying the factors that influence acceptance of a population-based screening proposal. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to women who had received three invitations to organised screenings (OS) for both breast and colorectal cancer. The categories of participants in both OS were designed from data from the regional cancer screening coordination centres in each department. Participation in opportunistic cervical cancer screening was evaluated as self-reported data. RESULTS: 4,634 questionnaires were returned out of the 17,194 sent, giving a global return rate of 27%. The highest rate of return (73.5%) was obtained from women who had participated at least once in both breast and colorectal cancer OS. An intermediate rate was obtained from women participating in breast cancer OS only (18.7%). Poor levels of return came from women who had participated in colorectal cancer OS only (3.6%) and from non-participants (4.1%). Our results suggest that women with lower educational levels tend to be the most regular attendants at OS (50.3%), compared to highly educated women (39.7%). 11.8% of women were overdue in their opportunistic cervical cancer screening. This percentage rose to 35.4% in the category of non-participants. In addition, women’s comments provide a better understanding of the reasons for irregular attendance and non-participation. CONCLUSION: Overall, similar behaviours towards screening were observed in the four departments. Our analysis suggests that participation in one cancer OS increases the likelihood of participating in others. This adhesion could be an interesting lever for raising women’s awareness of other cancer screenings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-023-02311-5. BioMed Central 2023-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10122322/ /pubmed/37085818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02311-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Duchange, Nathalie Poiseuil, Marie Rollet, Quentin Piette, Christine Cosson, Mathilde Quertier, Marie-Christine Moutel, Grégoire Darquy, Sylviane How do women comply with cancer screenings? A study in four regions of France |
title | How do women comply with cancer screenings? A study in four regions of France |
title_full | How do women comply with cancer screenings? A study in four regions of France |
title_fullStr | How do women comply with cancer screenings? A study in four regions of France |
title_full_unstemmed | How do women comply with cancer screenings? A study in four regions of France |
title_short | How do women comply with cancer screenings? A study in four regions of France |
title_sort | how do women comply with cancer screenings? a study in four regions of france |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10122322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37085818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02311-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duchangenathalie howdowomencomplywithcancerscreeningsastudyinfourregionsoffrance AT poiseuilmarie howdowomencomplywithcancerscreeningsastudyinfourregionsoffrance AT rolletquentin howdowomencomplywithcancerscreeningsastudyinfourregionsoffrance AT piettechristine howdowomencomplywithcancerscreeningsastudyinfourregionsoffrance AT cossonmathilde howdowomencomplywithcancerscreeningsastudyinfourregionsoffrance AT quertiermariechristine howdowomencomplywithcancerscreeningsastudyinfourregionsoffrance AT moutelgregoire howdowomencomplywithcancerscreeningsastudyinfourregionsoffrance AT darquysylviane howdowomencomplywithcancerscreeningsastudyinfourregionsoffrance |