Cargando…

How do women comply with cancer screenings? A study in four regions of France

BACKGROUND: This article looks at the behaviour of women facing different cancer screening options available to them from the age of 50 onward. The study was conducted in 2019 in four departments of the French territory with the objective of identifying the factors that influence acceptance of a pop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duchange, Nathalie, Poiseuil, Marie, Rollet, Quentin, Piette, Christine, Cosson, Mathilde, Quertier, Marie-Christine, Moutel, Grégoire, Darquy, Sylviane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10122322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37085818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02311-5
_version_ 1785029469277257728
author Duchange, Nathalie
Poiseuil, Marie
Rollet, Quentin
Piette, Christine
Cosson, Mathilde
Quertier, Marie-Christine
Moutel, Grégoire
Darquy, Sylviane
author_facet Duchange, Nathalie
Poiseuil, Marie
Rollet, Quentin
Piette, Christine
Cosson, Mathilde
Quertier, Marie-Christine
Moutel, Grégoire
Darquy, Sylviane
author_sort Duchange, Nathalie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This article looks at the behaviour of women facing different cancer screening options available to them from the age of 50 onward. The study was conducted in 2019 in four departments of the French territory with the objective of identifying the factors that influence acceptance of a population-based screening proposal. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to women who had received three invitations to organised screenings (OS) for both breast and colorectal cancer. The categories of participants in both OS were designed from data from the regional cancer screening coordination centres in each department. Participation in opportunistic cervical cancer screening was evaluated as self-reported data. RESULTS: 4,634 questionnaires were returned out of the 17,194 sent, giving a global return rate of 27%. The highest rate of return (73.5%) was obtained from women who had participated at least once in both breast and colorectal cancer OS. An intermediate rate was obtained from women participating in breast cancer OS only (18.7%). Poor levels of return came from women who had participated in colorectal cancer OS only (3.6%) and from non-participants (4.1%). Our results suggest that women with lower educational levels tend to be the most regular attendants at OS (50.3%), compared to highly educated women (39.7%). 11.8% of women were overdue in their opportunistic cervical cancer screening. This percentage rose to 35.4% in the category of non-participants. In addition, women’s comments provide a better understanding of the reasons for irregular attendance and non-participation. CONCLUSION: Overall, similar behaviours towards screening were observed in the four departments. Our analysis suggests that participation in one cancer OS increases the likelihood of participating in others. This adhesion could be an interesting lever for raising women’s awareness of other cancer screenings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-023-02311-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10122322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101223222023-04-23 How do women comply with cancer screenings? A study in four regions of France Duchange, Nathalie Poiseuil, Marie Rollet, Quentin Piette, Christine Cosson, Mathilde Quertier, Marie-Christine Moutel, Grégoire Darquy, Sylviane BMC Womens Health Research BACKGROUND: This article looks at the behaviour of women facing different cancer screening options available to them from the age of 50 onward. The study was conducted in 2019 in four departments of the French territory with the objective of identifying the factors that influence acceptance of a population-based screening proposal. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to women who had received three invitations to organised screenings (OS) for both breast and colorectal cancer. The categories of participants in both OS were designed from data from the regional cancer screening coordination centres in each department. Participation in opportunistic cervical cancer screening was evaluated as self-reported data. RESULTS: 4,634 questionnaires were returned out of the 17,194 sent, giving a global return rate of 27%. The highest rate of return (73.5%) was obtained from women who had participated at least once in both breast and colorectal cancer OS. An intermediate rate was obtained from women participating in breast cancer OS only (18.7%). Poor levels of return came from women who had participated in colorectal cancer OS only (3.6%) and from non-participants (4.1%). Our results suggest that women with lower educational levels tend to be the most regular attendants at OS (50.3%), compared to highly educated women (39.7%). 11.8% of women were overdue in their opportunistic cervical cancer screening. This percentage rose to 35.4% in the category of non-participants. In addition, women’s comments provide a better understanding of the reasons for irregular attendance and non-participation. CONCLUSION: Overall, similar behaviours towards screening were observed in the four departments. Our analysis suggests that participation in one cancer OS increases the likelihood of participating in others. This adhesion could be an interesting lever for raising women’s awareness of other cancer screenings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-023-02311-5. BioMed Central 2023-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10122322/ /pubmed/37085818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02311-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Duchange, Nathalie
Poiseuil, Marie
Rollet, Quentin
Piette, Christine
Cosson, Mathilde
Quertier, Marie-Christine
Moutel, Grégoire
Darquy, Sylviane
How do women comply with cancer screenings? A study in four regions of France
title How do women comply with cancer screenings? A study in four regions of France
title_full How do women comply with cancer screenings? A study in four regions of France
title_fullStr How do women comply with cancer screenings? A study in four regions of France
title_full_unstemmed How do women comply with cancer screenings? A study in four regions of France
title_short How do women comply with cancer screenings? A study in four regions of France
title_sort how do women comply with cancer screenings? a study in four regions of france
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10122322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37085818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02311-5
work_keys_str_mv AT duchangenathalie howdowomencomplywithcancerscreeningsastudyinfourregionsoffrance
AT poiseuilmarie howdowomencomplywithcancerscreeningsastudyinfourregionsoffrance
AT rolletquentin howdowomencomplywithcancerscreeningsastudyinfourregionsoffrance
AT piettechristine howdowomencomplywithcancerscreeningsastudyinfourregionsoffrance
AT cossonmathilde howdowomencomplywithcancerscreeningsastudyinfourregionsoffrance
AT quertiermariechristine howdowomencomplywithcancerscreeningsastudyinfourregionsoffrance
AT moutelgregoire howdowomencomplywithcancerscreeningsastudyinfourregionsoffrance
AT darquysylviane howdowomencomplywithcancerscreeningsastudyinfourregionsoffrance