Cargando…
Risk of magnetic resonance imaging-induced magnet dislocation for different types of cochlear implants: a single-center retrospective study
BACKGROUND: When performing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with a cochlear implant (CI), complication rates vary widely in the literature. The primary objective of this retrospective study was to determine the prevalence of complications, in particular magnet dislocation, in patients w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10122328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37085925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-023-00633-w |
_version_ | 1785029470531354624 |
---|---|
author | Rupp, Robin Balk, Matthias Sievert, Matti Leibl, Victoria Schleder, Stephan Allner, Moritz Iro, Heinrich Hoppe, Ulrich Hornung, Joachim Gostian, Antoniu-Oreste |
author_facet | Rupp, Robin Balk, Matthias Sievert, Matti Leibl, Victoria Schleder, Stephan Allner, Moritz Iro, Heinrich Hoppe, Ulrich Hornung, Joachim Gostian, Antoniu-Oreste |
author_sort | Rupp, Robin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: When performing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with a cochlear implant (CI), complication rates vary widely in the literature. The primary objective of this retrospective study was to determine the prevalence of complications, in particular magnet dislocation, in patients with CI undergoing 1.5 Tesla (T) MRI. As a secondary objective, the prevalence of magnet dislocation for specific cochlear implant device types was elaborated. METHODS: In a single-center retrospective study, all patients with a cochlear implant presenting for an MRI examination at 1.5 T at our institution between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2020 were included. Implants with axial and diametrical magnets were included in the study. MRI safety measures were applied before imaging. The prevalence of complications was evaluated. Magnet dislocation rates were calculated for device types with at least 20 MRI exposures. RESULTS: During the study period, 196 MRI examinations were performed in a total of 128 patients, accounting for 149 different implants (21 implanted bilaterally) with a total of 231 implant exposures to MRI (average 1.69 ± 1.57; min. 1, max. 12). Complications were reported in 50 out of 231 cochlear implant exposures (21.6%). Magnet dislocation occurred in a total of 27 cases (11.7%). Dislocation rates were 29.6% for the Cochlear® CI500 series (24 dislocations from 81 exposures), 1.1% for the Cochlear® CI24RE series (1 from 87) and 0% for the MED-EL® Synchrony (0 from 36). The dislocation rate for the CI500 was significantly higher than for the CI24RE (χ(2)((1)) = 26.86; p < 0.001; ϕ = 0.40) or the Synchrony (χ(2)((1)) = 13.42; p < 0.001; ϕ = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: For 1.5 T MRI, the risk of magnet dislocation ranges from 0 to 29.6% and depends on the CI device type. Implants with a diametrical magnet can be considered potentially MRI-safe, whereas in CIs with axial magnets, the CI500 is at high risk of magnet dislocation. Therefore, apart from a strict indication for an MRI and adherence to safety protocols, post-MRI follow-up examination to rule out magnet dislocation is recommended. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10122328 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101223282023-04-23 Risk of magnetic resonance imaging-induced magnet dislocation for different types of cochlear implants: a single-center retrospective study Rupp, Robin Balk, Matthias Sievert, Matti Leibl, Victoria Schleder, Stephan Allner, Moritz Iro, Heinrich Hoppe, Ulrich Hornung, Joachim Gostian, Antoniu-Oreste J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Original Research Article BACKGROUND: When performing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with a cochlear implant (CI), complication rates vary widely in the literature. The primary objective of this retrospective study was to determine the prevalence of complications, in particular magnet dislocation, in patients with CI undergoing 1.5 Tesla (T) MRI. As a secondary objective, the prevalence of magnet dislocation for specific cochlear implant device types was elaborated. METHODS: In a single-center retrospective study, all patients with a cochlear implant presenting for an MRI examination at 1.5 T at our institution between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2020 were included. Implants with axial and diametrical magnets were included in the study. MRI safety measures were applied before imaging. The prevalence of complications was evaluated. Magnet dislocation rates were calculated for device types with at least 20 MRI exposures. RESULTS: During the study period, 196 MRI examinations were performed in a total of 128 patients, accounting for 149 different implants (21 implanted bilaterally) with a total of 231 implant exposures to MRI (average 1.69 ± 1.57; min. 1, max. 12). Complications were reported in 50 out of 231 cochlear implant exposures (21.6%). Magnet dislocation occurred in a total of 27 cases (11.7%). Dislocation rates were 29.6% for the Cochlear® CI500 series (24 dislocations from 81 exposures), 1.1% for the Cochlear® CI24RE series (1 from 87) and 0% for the MED-EL® Synchrony (0 from 36). The dislocation rate for the CI500 was significantly higher than for the CI24RE (χ(2)((1)) = 26.86; p < 0.001; ϕ = 0.40) or the Synchrony (χ(2)((1)) = 13.42; p < 0.001; ϕ = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: For 1.5 T MRI, the risk of magnet dislocation ranges from 0 to 29.6% and depends on the CI device type. Implants with a diametrical magnet can be considered potentially MRI-safe, whereas in CIs with axial magnets, the CI500 is at high risk of magnet dislocation. Therefore, apart from a strict indication for an MRI and adherence to safety protocols, post-MRI follow-up examination to rule out magnet dislocation is recommended. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2023-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10122328/ /pubmed/37085925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-023-00633-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Rupp, Robin Balk, Matthias Sievert, Matti Leibl, Victoria Schleder, Stephan Allner, Moritz Iro, Heinrich Hoppe, Ulrich Hornung, Joachim Gostian, Antoniu-Oreste Risk of magnetic resonance imaging-induced magnet dislocation for different types of cochlear implants: a single-center retrospective study |
title | Risk of magnetic resonance imaging-induced magnet dislocation for different types of cochlear implants: a single-center retrospective study |
title_full | Risk of magnetic resonance imaging-induced magnet dislocation for different types of cochlear implants: a single-center retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Risk of magnetic resonance imaging-induced magnet dislocation for different types of cochlear implants: a single-center retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk of magnetic resonance imaging-induced magnet dislocation for different types of cochlear implants: a single-center retrospective study |
title_short | Risk of magnetic resonance imaging-induced magnet dislocation for different types of cochlear implants: a single-center retrospective study |
title_sort | risk of magnetic resonance imaging-induced magnet dislocation for different types of cochlear implants: a single-center retrospective study |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10122328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37085925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40463-023-00633-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rupprobin riskofmagneticresonanceimaginginducedmagnetdislocationfordifferenttypesofcochlearimplantsasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT balkmatthias riskofmagneticresonanceimaginginducedmagnetdislocationfordifferenttypesofcochlearimplantsasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT sievertmatti riskofmagneticresonanceimaginginducedmagnetdislocationfordifferenttypesofcochlearimplantsasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT leiblvictoria riskofmagneticresonanceimaginginducedmagnetdislocationfordifferenttypesofcochlearimplantsasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT schlederstephan riskofmagneticresonanceimaginginducedmagnetdislocationfordifferenttypesofcochlearimplantsasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT allnermoritz riskofmagneticresonanceimaginginducedmagnetdislocationfordifferenttypesofcochlearimplantsasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT iroheinrich riskofmagneticresonanceimaginginducedmagnetdislocationfordifferenttypesofcochlearimplantsasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT hoppeulrich riskofmagneticresonanceimaginginducedmagnetdislocationfordifferenttypesofcochlearimplantsasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT hornungjoachim riskofmagneticresonanceimaginginducedmagnetdislocationfordifferenttypesofcochlearimplantsasinglecenterretrospectivestudy AT gostianantoniuoreste riskofmagneticresonanceimaginginducedmagnetdislocationfordifferenttypesofcochlearimplantsasinglecenterretrospectivestudy |