超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定灰尘中26种双酚类化合物

Bisphenol A (BPA) is one of the most widely produced compounds in the world and was listed as a substance of very high concern by the European Chemicals Agency in 2016. Because of its toxicity, many countries and regions, including China, have banned BPA addition in feeding-bottles. And the European Union (EU) has banned BPA use in other food contact materials and thermal paper. Restrictions on BPA have contributed to the widespread use of alternatives. As the toxicity of BPA alternatives continues to be revealed, the alternatives of BPA alternatives are being developing. As the most extensive alternative for BPA, bisphenol S (BPS) was proven to have estrogen-disrupting effects and developmental toxicity of the neuroendocrine system. Therefore, BPS alternatives are used in thermal paper. In this study, alternatives to both BPA and BPS are collectively referred to as bisphenols (BPs). As a pooling matrix of many indoor chemicals, dust is an important pathway for human exposure to BPs. BPA and its alternatives are routinely detected in dust. As BPS alternatives have been detected in recycled paper and sludge, it is also very important to detected in dust. However, common analytical methods for BPs have low sensitivity and contain few BPS alternatives. Therefore, a high-throughput, high-accuracy, and high-sensitivity method must be established for the determination of BPs in dust; this will lay the foundation for subsequent studies on the environmental behavior and exposure risk of BPs. In this study, an ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method was developed for the simultaneous determination of 26 variations of BPs in dust. UPLC-MS/MS parameters of the variations were optimized to compare the separation effect and response intensity in different columns and mobile phases. The influence of the extraction solvent and solid phase extraction (SPE) on the extraction efficiency and purification effect of target compounds were optimized by using the isotopic internal standard method, and the 26 variations of BPs in dust was quantitatively analyzed. Finally, the dust samples were extracted by using 3 mL of acetonitrile and 3 mL of a 50% methanol aqueous solution in an ultrasound bath. The combined extract was further purified by using an Oasis HLB cartridge (60 mg/3 mL). The cartridge was then washed with a 40% methanol aqueous solution (0.5 mL) and eluted with methanol (2 mL). The target compounds were separated on a CORTECS(®) UPLC(®) C(18) column (100 mm×2.1 mm, 1.6 μm), with methanol and 1 mmol/L ammonium fluoride solution as mobile phases and a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. Electrospray ionization (ESI) was applied in the positive, negative, and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) modes for the mass scan. Under optimized conditions, the linear ranges of the 26 targets behaved well linearly in their respective ranges with correlation coefficients (r(2))>0.999. The limits of detection (LODs) and limits of quantification (LOQs) were assessed using signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios of 3 and 10, respectively. The LODs and LOQs of the method were 0.01-0.75 μg/kg and 0.02-2.50 μg/kg, respectively. The accuracy of the method was evaluated by conducting a recovery test at three spiked levels: LOQ, two times the LOQ, and 10 times the LOQ, with the average recoveries ranging from 83.7% to 114.9%. The precision of the method was evaluated by using the relative standard deviation (RSD). The intra-day RSDs and inter-day RSDs were 0.86%-9.79% (n=6) and 5.16%-19.5% (n=6), respectively. The established method was used to determine 11 dust samples. Fifteen BPs were detected at a detection rate of 9.1%-100.0%. The detection rate for BPA, BPS, bisphenol F (BPF), 4-hydroxy-4'-isopropoxydiphenylsulfone (BPSIP), and diphenyl sulfone (DPS) was 100.0%. BPSIP, 4-allyloxy-4'-hydroxydiphenyl sulfone (BPS-MAE), and bis-(3-allyl-4-hydroxyphenyl) sulfone (TGSA) were first detected in Chinese dust, whereas 4-benzyloxy-4'-hydroxydiphenyl sulfone (BPS-MPE), 4-hydroxybenzoic acid benzyl (PHBB), and DPS were first detected in dust samples worldwide. This method is simple, rapid, and sensitive, and is suitable for the qualitative screening and quantitative analysis of the 26 BPs in dust samples.