Cargando…

Effect of low-to-moderate hyperoxia on lung injury in preclinical animal models: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Extensive animal investigation informed clinical practice regarding the harmful effects of high fractional inspired oxygen concentrations (FiO(2)s > 0.60). Since questions persist whether lower but still supraphysiologic FiO(2) ≤ 0.60 and > 0.21 (FiO(2) ≤ 0.60/ > 0.21) are also...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minkove, Samuel, Dhamapurkar, Rhea, Cui, Xizhong, Li, Yan, Sun, Junfeng, Cooper, Diane, Eichacker, Peter Q., Torabi-Parizi, Parizad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10122981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37088856
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-023-00501-x
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Extensive animal investigation informed clinical practice regarding the harmful effects of high fractional inspired oxygen concentrations (FiO(2)s > 0.60). Since questions persist whether lower but still supraphysiologic FiO(2) ≤ 0.60 and > 0.21 (FiO(2) ≤ 0.60/ > 0.21) are also harmful with inflammatory lung injury in patients, we performed a systematic review examining this question in animal models. METHODS: Studies retrieved from systematic literature searches of three databases, that compared the effects of exposure to FiO(2) ≤ 0.60/ > 0.21 vs. FiO(2) = 0.21 for ≥ 24 h in adult in vivo animal models including an inflammatory challenge or not were analyzed. Survival, body weight and/or lung injury measures were included in meta-analysis if reported in ≥ 3 studies. RESULTS: More than 600 retrieved reports investigated only FiO(2)s > 0.60 and were not analyzed. Ten studies with an inflammatory challenge (6 infectious and 4 noninfectious) and 14 studies without, investigated FiO(2)s ≤ 0.60/ > 0.21 and were analyzed separately. In seven studies with an inflammatory challenge, compared to FiO(2) = 0.21, FiO(2) ≤ 0.60/ > 0.21 had consistent effects across animal types on the overall odds ratio of survival (95%CI) that was on the side of harm but not significant [0.68 (0.38,1.23), p = 0.21; I(2) = 0%, p = 0.57]. However, oxygen exposure times were only 1d in 4 studies and 2–4d in another. In a trend approaching significance, FiO(2) ≤ 0.60/ > 0.21 with an inflammatory challenge consistently increased the standardized mean difference (95%CI) (SMD) in lung weights [0.47 (− 0.07,1.00), p = 0.09; I(2) = 0%, p = 0.50; n = 4 studies] but had inconsistent effects on lung lavage protein concentrations (n = 3), lung pathology scores (n = 4) and/or arterial oxygenation (n = 4) (I(2) ≥ 43%, p ≤ 0.17). Studies without an inflammatory challenge had consistent effects on lung lavage protein concentration (n = 3) SMDs on the side of being increased that was not significant [0.43 (− 0.23,1.09), p = 0.20; I(2) = 0%, p = 0.40] but had inconsistent effects on body and lung weights (n = 6 and 8 studies, respectively) (I(2) ≥ 71%, p < 0.01). Quality of evidence for studies was weak. INTERPRETATION: Limited animal studies have investigated FiO(2) ≤ 0.60/ > 0.21 with clinically relevant models and endpoints but suggest even these lower FiO(2)s may be injurious. Given the influence animal studies examining FiO(2) > 0.60 have had on clinical practice, additional ones investigating FiO(2) ≤ 0.60/ > 0.21 appear warranted, particularly in pneumonia models. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40635-023-00501-x.