Cargando…

Communicating radiation dose in medical imaging: How to best inform our patients?

BACKGROUND: The newly adopted European directive DE59/2013 mandates adequate patient information in procedures involving ionising radiation. Patient interest in knowing about their radiation dose and an effective communication method for dose exposure remain poorly investigated. PURPOSE: This study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salerno, Sergio, Nardi, Cosimo, Pace, Mario, Rabiolo, Lidia, Flammia, Federica, Loverre, Francesco, Matranga, Domenica, Granata, Claudio, Tomà, Paolo, Colagrande, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10123897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20584601231168967
_version_ 1785029746483003392
author Salerno, Sergio
Nardi, Cosimo
Pace, Mario
Rabiolo, Lidia
Flammia, Federica
Loverre, Francesco
Matranga, Domenica
Granata, Claudio
Tomà, Paolo
Colagrande, Stefano
author_facet Salerno, Sergio
Nardi, Cosimo
Pace, Mario
Rabiolo, Lidia
Flammia, Federica
Loverre, Francesco
Matranga, Domenica
Granata, Claudio
Tomà, Paolo
Colagrande, Stefano
author_sort Salerno, Sergio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The newly adopted European directive DE59/2013 mandates adequate patient information in procedures involving ionising radiation. Patient interest in knowing about their radiation dose and an effective communication method for dose exposure remain poorly investigated. PURPOSE: This study is aimed at investigating both patient interest in radiation dose and an effective method to communicate radiation dose exposure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present analysis is based on a multi-centre cross-sectional data collection involving 1,084 patients from four different hospitals ‒ two general and two paediatric hospitals. Anonymous questionnaires were administered, consisting of an initial overview of radiation use in imaging procedures, a patient data section, and an explanatory section providing information in four modalities. RESULTS: 1009 patients were included in the analysis, with 75 refusing participation; 173 participants were relatives of paediatric patients. Initial information provided to patients was considered comprehensible. The information modality with symbols was considered the most readily understandable format by patients, with no appreciable differences in comprehension attributable to social or cultural background. The modality including dose numbers and diagnostic reference levels was preferred by patients with higher socio-economic background. The option ‘None of those’ was selected by one-third of our sample population, composed of four different clusters: female, over 60 years old, unemployed, and from low socio-economic backgrounds. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a high level of interest amongst patients in knowing about radiation dose exposure. Pictorial representations were well understood by patients from a variety of different ages and education levels. However, a universally comprehensible model of communicating radiation dose information remains to be elucidated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10123897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101238972023-04-25 Communicating radiation dose in medical imaging: How to best inform our patients? Salerno, Sergio Nardi, Cosimo Pace, Mario Rabiolo, Lidia Flammia, Federica Loverre, Francesco Matranga, Domenica Granata, Claudio Tomà, Paolo Colagrande, Stefano Acta Radiol Open Original Article BACKGROUND: The newly adopted European directive DE59/2013 mandates adequate patient information in procedures involving ionising radiation. Patient interest in knowing about their radiation dose and an effective communication method for dose exposure remain poorly investigated. PURPOSE: This study is aimed at investigating both patient interest in radiation dose and an effective method to communicate radiation dose exposure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present analysis is based on a multi-centre cross-sectional data collection involving 1,084 patients from four different hospitals ‒ two general and two paediatric hospitals. Anonymous questionnaires were administered, consisting of an initial overview of radiation use in imaging procedures, a patient data section, and an explanatory section providing information in four modalities. RESULTS: 1009 patients were included in the analysis, with 75 refusing participation; 173 participants were relatives of paediatric patients. Initial information provided to patients was considered comprehensible. The information modality with symbols was considered the most readily understandable format by patients, with no appreciable differences in comprehension attributable to social or cultural background. The modality including dose numbers and diagnostic reference levels was preferred by patients with higher socio-economic background. The option ‘None of those’ was selected by one-third of our sample population, composed of four different clusters: female, over 60 years old, unemployed, and from low socio-economic backgrounds. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a high level of interest amongst patients in knowing about radiation dose exposure. Pictorial representations were well understood by patients from a variety of different ages and education levels. However, a universally comprehensible model of communicating radiation dose information remains to be elucidated. SAGE Publications 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10123897/ /pubmed/37101461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20584601231168967 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Salerno, Sergio
Nardi, Cosimo
Pace, Mario
Rabiolo, Lidia
Flammia, Federica
Loverre, Francesco
Matranga, Domenica
Granata, Claudio
Tomà, Paolo
Colagrande, Stefano
Communicating radiation dose in medical imaging: How to best inform our patients?
title Communicating radiation dose in medical imaging: How to best inform our patients?
title_full Communicating radiation dose in medical imaging: How to best inform our patients?
title_fullStr Communicating radiation dose in medical imaging: How to best inform our patients?
title_full_unstemmed Communicating radiation dose in medical imaging: How to best inform our patients?
title_short Communicating radiation dose in medical imaging: How to best inform our patients?
title_sort communicating radiation dose in medical imaging: how to best inform our patients?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10123897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20584601231168967
work_keys_str_mv AT salernosergio communicatingradiationdoseinmedicalimaginghowtobestinformourpatients
AT nardicosimo communicatingradiationdoseinmedicalimaginghowtobestinformourpatients
AT pacemario communicatingradiationdoseinmedicalimaginghowtobestinformourpatients
AT rabiololidia communicatingradiationdoseinmedicalimaginghowtobestinformourpatients
AT flammiafederica communicatingradiationdoseinmedicalimaginghowtobestinformourpatients
AT loverrefrancesco communicatingradiationdoseinmedicalimaginghowtobestinformourpatients
AT matrangadomenica communicatingradiationdoseinmedicalimaginghowtobestinformourpatients
AT granataclaudio communicatingradiationdoseinmedicalimaginghowtobestinformourpatients
AT tomapaolo communicatingradiationdoseinmedicalimaginghowtobestinformourpatients
AT colagrandestefano communicatingradiationdoseinmedicalimaginghowtobestinformourpatients