Cargando…
The ‘what’ and ‘how’ of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: Adverse social determinants of health give rise to individual-level social needs that have the potential to negatively impact health. Screening patients to identify unmet social needs is becoming more widespread. A review of the content of currently available screening tools is warranted...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10124546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101795 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15263 |
_version_ | 1785029858401714176 |
---|---|
author | Karran, Emma L. G. Cashin, Aidan Barker, Trevor A. Boyd, Mark Chiarotto, Alessandro Dewidar, Omar Petkovic, Jennifer Sharma, Saurab Tugwell, Peter Moseley, G. Lorimer |
author_facet | Karran, Emma L. G. Cashin, Aidan Barker, Trevor A. Boyd, Mark Chiarotto, Alessandro Dewidar, Omar Petkovic, Jennifer Sharma, Saurab Tugwell, Peter Moseley, G. Lorimer |
author_sort | Karran, Emma L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Adverse social determinants of health give rise to individual-level social needs that have the potential to negatively impact health. Screening patients to identify unmet social needs is becoming more widespread. A review of the content of currently available screening tools is warranted. The aim of this scoping review was to determine what social needs categories are included in published Social Needs Screening Tools that have been developed for use in primary care settings, and how these social needs are screened. METHODS: We pre-registered the study on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/dqan2/). We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 01/01/2010 to 3/05/2022 to identify eligible studies reporting tools designed for use in primary healthcare settings. Two reviewers independently screened studies, a single reviewer extracted data. We summarised the characteristics of included studies descriptively and calculated the number of studies that collected data relevant to specific social needs categories. We identified sub-categories to classify the types of questions relevant to each of the main categories. RESULTS: We identified 420 unique citations, and 27 were included. Nine additional studies were retrieved by searching for tools that were used or referred to in excluded studies. Questions relating to food insecurity and the physical environment in which a person lives were the most frequently included items (92–94% of tools), followed by questions relating to economic stability and aspects of social and community context (81%). Seventy-five percent of the screening tools included items that evaluated five or more social needs categories (mean 6.5; standard deviation 1.75). One study reported that the tool had been ‘validated’; 16 reported ‘partial’ validation; 12 reported that the tool was ‘not validated’ and seven studies did not report validation processes or outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10124546 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101245462023-04-25 The ‘what’ and ‘how’ of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review Karran, Emma L. G. Cashin, Aidan Barker, Trevor A. Boyd, Mark Chiarotto, Alessandro Dewidar, Omar Petkovic, Jennifer Sharma, Saurab Tugwell, Peter Moseley, G. Lorimer PeerJ Emergency and Critical Care BACKGROUND: Adverse social determinants of health give rise to individual-level social needs that have the potential to negatively impact health. Screening patients to identify unmet social needs is becoming more widespread. A review of the content of currently available screening tools is warranted. The aim of this scoping review was to determine what social needs categories are included in published Social Needs Screening Tools that have been developed for use in primary care settings, and how these social needs are screened. METHODS: We pre-registered the study on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/dqan2/). We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 01/01/2010 to 3/05/2022 to identify eligible studies reporting tools designed for use in primary healthcare settings. Two reviewers independently screened studies, a single reviewer extracted data. We summarised the characteristics of included studies descriptively and calculated the number of studies that collected data relevant to specific social needs categories. We identified sub-categories to classify the types of questions relevant to each of the main categories. RESULTS: We identified 420 unique citations, and 27 were included. Nine additional studies were retrieved by searching for tools that were used or referred to in excluded studies. Questions relating to food insecurity and the physical environment in which a person lives were the most frequently included items (92–94% of tools), followed by questions relating to economic stability and aspects of social and community context (81%). Seventy-five percent of the screening tools included items that evaluated five or more social needs categories (mean 6.5; standard deviation 1.75). One study reported that the tool had been ‘validated’; 16 reported ‘partial’ validation; 12 reported that the tool was ‘not validated’ and seven studies did not report validation processes or outcomes. PeerJ Inc. 2023-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10124546/ /pubmed/37101795 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15263 Text en © 2023 Karran et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Emergency and Critical Care Karran, Emma L. G. Cashin, Aidan Barker, Trevor A. Boyd, Mark Chiarotto, Alessandro Dewidar, Omar Petkovic, Jennifer Sharma, Saurab Tugwell, Peter Moseley, G. Lorimer The ‘what’ and ‘how’ of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review |
title | The ‘what’ and ‘how’ of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review |
title_full | The ‘what’ and ‘how’ of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | The ‘what’ and ‘how’ of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | The ‘what’ and ‘how’ of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review |
title_short | The ‘what’ and ‘how’ of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review |
title_sort | ‘what’ and ‘how’ of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review |
topic | Emergency and Critical Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10124546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101795 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15263 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karranemmal thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT gcashinaidan thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT barkertrevor thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT aboydmark thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT chiarottoalessandro thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT dewidaromar thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT petkovicjennifer thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT sharmasaurab thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT tugwellpeter thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT moseleyglorimer thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT karranemmal whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT gcashinaidan whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT barkertrevor whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT aboydmark whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT chiarottoalessandro whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT dewidaromar whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT petkovicjennifer whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT sharmasaurab whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT tugwellpeter whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT moseleyglorimer whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview |