Cargando…

The ‘what’ and ‘how’ of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Adverse social determinants of health give rise to individual-level social needs that have the potential to negatively impact health. Screening patients to identify unmet social needs is becoming more widespread. A review of the content of currently available screening tools is warranted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karran, Emma L., G. Cashin, Aidan, Barker, Trevor, A. Boyd, Mark, Chiarotto, Alessandro, Dewidar, Omar, Petkovic, Jennifer, Sharma, Saurab, Tugwell, Peter, Moseley, G. Lorimer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10124546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101795
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15263
_version_ 1785029858401714176
author Karran, Emma L.
G. Cashin, Aidan
Barker, Trevor
A. Boyd, Mark
Chiarotto, Alessandro
Dewidar, Omar
Petkovic, Jennifer
Sharma, Saurab
Tugwell, Peter
Moseley, G. Lorimer
author_facet Karran, Emma L.
G. Cashin, Aidan
Barker, Trevor
A. Boyd, Mark
Chiarotto, Alessandro
Dewidar, Omar
Petkovic, Jennifer
Sharma, Saurab
Tugwell, Peter
Moseley, G. Lorimer
author_sort Karran, Emma L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adverse social determinants of health give rise to individual-level social needs that have the potential to negatively impact health. Screening patients to identify unmet social needs is becoming more widespread. A review of the content of currently available screening tools is warranted. The aim of this scoping review was to determine what social needs categories are included in published Social Needs Screening Tools that have been developed for use in primary care settings, and how these social needs are screened. METHODS: We pre-registered the study on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/dqan2/). We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 01/01/2010 to 3/05/2022 to identify eligible studies reporting tools designed for use in primary healthcare settings. Two reviewers independently screened studies, a single reviewer extracted data. We summarised the characteristics of included studies descriptively and calculated the number of studies that collected data relevant to specific social needs categories. We identified sub-categories to classify the types of questions relevant to each of the main categories. RESULTS: We identified 420 unique citations, and 27 were included. Nine additional studies were retrieved by searching for tools that were used or referred to in excluded studies. Questions relating to food insecurity and the physical environment in which a person lives were the most frequently included items (92–94% of tools), followed by questions relating to economic stability and aspects of social and community context (81%). Seventy-five percent of the screening tools included items that evaluated five or more social needs categories (mean 6.5; standard deviation 1.75). One study reported that the tool had been ‘validated’; 16 reported ‘partial’ validation; 12 reported that the tool was ‘not validated’ and seven studies did not report validation processes or outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10124546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101245462023-04-25 The ‘what’ and ‘how’ of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review Karran, Emma L. G. Cashin, Aidan Barker, Trevor A. Boyd, Mark Chiarotto, Alessandro Dewidar, Omar Petkovic, Jennifer Sharma, Saurab Tugwell, Peter Moseley, G. Lorimer PeerJ Emergency and Critical Care BACKGROUND: Adverse social determinants of health give rise to individual-level social needs that have the potential to negatively impact health. Screening patients to identify unmet social needs is becoming more widespread. A review of the content of currently available screening tools is warranted. The aim of this scoping review was to determine what social needs categories are included in published Social Needs Screening Tools that have been developed for use in primary care settings, and how these social needs are screened. METHODS: We pre-registered the study on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/dqan2/). We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 01/01/2010 to 3/05/2022 to identify eligible studies reporting tools designed for use in primary healthcare settings. Two reviewers independently screened studies, a single reviewer extracted data. We summarised the characteristics of included studies descriptively and calculated the number of studies that collected data relevant to specific social needs categories. We identified sub-categories to classify the types of questions relevant to each of the main categories. RESULTS: We identified 420 unique citations, and 27 were included. Nine additional studies were retrieved by searching for tools that were used or referred to in excluded studies. Questions relating to food insecurity and the physical environment in which a person lives were the most frequently included items (92–94% of tools), followed by questions relating to economic stability and aspects of social and community context (81%). Seventy-five percent of the screening tools included items that evaluated five or more social needs categories (mean 6.5; standard deviation 1.75). One study reported that the tool had been ‘validated’; 16 reported ‘partial’ validation; 12 reported that the tool was ‘not validated’ and seven studies did not report validation processes or outcomes. PeerJ Inc. 2023-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10124546/ /pubmed/37101795 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15263 Text en © 2023 Karran et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Emergency and Critical Care
Karran, Emma L.
G. Cashin, Aidan
Barker, Trevor
A. Boyd, Mark
Chiarotto, Alessandro
Dewidar, Omar
Petkovic, Jennifer
Sharma, Saurab
Tugwell, Peter
Moseley, G. Lorimer
The ‘what’ and ‘how’ of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review
title The ‘what’ and ‘how’ of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review
title_full The ‘what’ and ‘how’ of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review
title_fullStr The ‘what’ and ‘how’ of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed The ‘what’ and ‘how’ of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review
title_short The ‘what’ and ‘how’ of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review
title_sort ‘what’ and ‘how’ of screening for social needs in healthcare settings: a scoping review
topic Emergency and Critical Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10124546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101795
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15263
work_keys_str_mv AT karranemmal thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview
AT gcashinaidan thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview
AT barkertrevor thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview
AT aboydmark thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview
AT chiarottoalessandro thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview
AT dewidaromar thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview
AT petkovicjennifer thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview
AT sharmasaurab thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview
AT tugwellpeter thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview
AT moseleyglorimer thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview
AT thewhatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview
AT karranemmal whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview
AT gcashinaidan whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview
AT barkertrevor whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview
AT aboydmark whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview
AT chiarottoalessandro whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview
AT dewidaromar whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview
AT petkovicjennifer whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview
AT sharmasaurab whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview
AT tugwellpeter whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview
AT moseleyglorimer whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview
AT whatandhowofscreeningforsocialneedsinhealthcaresettingsascopingreview