Cargando…

Identifying diversity, equity, and inclusion enhancement opportunities through an online mixed methods library survey

OBJECTIVE: A mixed methods survey was conducted at a health sciences library to assess patrons' perceptions of the library's digital and physical environments in relation to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). METHODS: Developed by the library's DEI Team and preceded by a pilot as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morgan-Daniel, Jane, Norton, Hannah F., Adkins, Lauren E., Tennant, Michele R., Edwards, Mary E., Daley, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10124613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101916
http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1436
_version_ 1785029872975872000
author Morgan-Daniel, Jane
Norton, Hannah F.
Adkins, Lauren E.
Tennant, Michele R.
Edwards, Mary E.
Daley, Matthew
author_facet Morgan-Daniel, Jane
Norton, Hannah F.
Adkins, Lauren E.
Tennant, Michele R.
Edwards, Mary E.
Daley, Matthew
author_sort Morgan-Daniel, Jane
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A mixed methods survey was conducted at a health sciences library to assess patrons' perceptions of the library's digital and physical environments in relation to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). METHODS: Developed by the library's DEI Team and preceded by a pilot assessment, the survey posed 17 Likert Scale questions and 2 free-text response questions on the topics of belonging, inclusivity, equitability, emotional and physical safety, and commitment to DEI. The survey was created in Qualtrics, pilot tested, and launched in February 2020 for approximately 12 weeks. RESULTS: Objective question responses were received from 101 individuals, with 24 open-ended responses. The quantitative findings showed largely positive perceptions of the DEI climate. Questions about feeling welcome and feeling physically safe were among those with the highest responses. The three lower-scoring questions indicate areas for improvement, including services for people whose native language is not English, for individuals with disabilities, and for families. The qualitative findings indicate the library's strengths include its exhibitions, welcoming atmosphere, and LGBTQ+ inclusivity initiatives. In contrast, opportunities for enhancement encompass non-English language resources, website updates, and accessibility to some physical spaces. CONCLUSION: The DEI Team is using the online survey data to enhance library services, staffing, programming, policies, and spaces. These improvements include looking into providing a space for patrons with families, expanding services for individuals whose first language is not English, assessing library accessibility for people with physical disabilities, and enhancing the physical space with quiet areas, improved lighting, and meditation spaces. Employee DEI training is ongoing, using results from a training needs survey to identify knowledge gaps. The library has a history of successful partnerships with campus entities, which will help the DEI Team to move forward with their work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10124613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101246132023-04-25 Identifying diversity, equity, and inclusion enhancement opportunities through an online mixed methods library survey Morgan-Daniel, Jane Norton, Hannah F. Adkins, Lauren E. Tennant, Michele R. Edwards, Mary E. Daley, Matthew J Med Libr Assoc Original Investigation OBJECTIVE: A mixed methods survey was conducted at a health sciences library to assess patrons' perceptions of the library's digital and physical environments in relation to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). METHODS: Developed by the library's DEI Team and preceded by a pilot assessment, the survey posed 17 Likert Scale questions and 2 free-text response questions on the topics of belonging, inclusivity, equitability, emotional and physical safety, and commitment to DEI. The survey was created in Qualtrics, pilot tested, and launched in February 2020 for approximately 12 weeks. RESULTS: Objective question responses were received from 101 individuals, with 24 open-ended responses. The quantitative findings showed largely positive perceptions of the DEI climate. Questions about feeling welcome and feeling physically safe were among those with the highest responses. The three lower-scoring questions indicate areas for improvement, including services for people whose native language is not English, for individuals with disabilities, and for families. The qualitative findings indicate the library's strengths include its exhibitions, welcoming atmosphere, and LGBTQ+ inclusivity initiatives. In contrast, opportunities for enhancement encompass non-English language resources, website updates, and accessibility to some physical spaces. CONCLUSION: The DEI Team is using the online survey data to enhance library services, staffing, programming, policies, and spaces. These improvements include looking into providing a space for patrons with families, expanding services for individuals whose first language is not English, assessing library accessibility for people with physical disabilities, and enhancing the physical space with quiet areas, improved lighting, and meditation spaces. Employee DEI training is ongoing, using results from a training needs survey to identify knowledge gaps. The library has a history of successful partnerships with campus entities, which will help the DEI Team to move forward with their work. University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2022-10-01 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10124613/ /pubmed/37101916 http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1436 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jane Morgan-Daniel, Hannah F. Norton, Lauren E. Adkins, Michele R. Tennant, Mary E. Edwards, Matthew Daley https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Morgan-Daniel, Jane
Norton, Hannah F.
Adkins, Lauren E.
Tennant, Michele R.
Edwards, Mary E.
Daley, Matthew
Identifying diversity, equity, and inclusion enhancement opportunities through an online mixed methods library survey
title Identifying diversity, equity, and inclusion enhancement opportunities through an online mixed methods library survey
title_full Identifying diversity, equity, and inclusion enhancement opportunities through an online mixed methods library survey
title_fullStr Identifying diversity, equity, and inclusion enhancement opportunities through an online mixed methods library survey
title_full_unstemmed Identifying diversity, equity, and inclusion enhancement opportunities through an online mixed methods library survey
title_short Identifying diversity, equity, and inclusion enhancement opportunities through an online mixed methods library survey
title_sort identifying diversity, equity, and inclusion enhancement opportunities through an online mixed methods library survey
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10124613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101916
http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1436
work_keys_str_mv AT morgandanieljane identifyingdiversityequityandinclusionenhancementopportunitiesthroughanonlinemixedmethodslibrarysurvey
AT nortonhannahf identifyingdiversityequityandinclusionenhancementopportunitiesthroughanonlinemixedmethodslibrarysurvey
AT adkinslaurene identifyingdiversityequityandinclusionenhancementopportunitiesthroughanonlinemixedmethodslibrarysurvey
AT tennantmicheler identifyingdiversityequityandinclusionenhancementopportunitiesthroughanonlinemixedmethodslibrarysurvey
AT edwardsmarye identifyingdiversityequityandinclusionenhancementopportunitiesthroughanonlinemixedmethodslibrarysurvey
AT daleymatthew identifyingdiversityequityandinclusionenhancementopportunitiesthroughanonlinemixedmethodslibrarysurvey