Cargando…

Rituximab biosimilar for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a phase 3 randomized study in India

PURPOSE: Very few studies have demonstrated the rituximab biosimilarity in terms of efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in India. Therefore, we compared the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Ankit, Bhatt, Niraj, Prakash, S. S., Biswas, Ghanashyam, Nagarkar, Rajnish, Roy, Bodhisatta, Samal, Priyanka, Agrawal, Narendra, Meshram, Sushil, Kaushal, Ashish, Satheesh, C. T., Wategaonkar, Ravikumar, Thiagarajan, Kasi Viswanathan, Jain, Kartikeya, Vijayaveeran, P., Mukherjee , Kalyan, Singh, Kishore, Patil, Tushar, Jain, Amit, Dolai, Tuphan Kanti, Jain, Minish, Hingmire, Sachin, Gupta, Tara Chand, Lakshmaiah, K. C., Rajamanickam, Deepan, Nemade, Bhushan, Goyal, Vikash, Mahato, Pinaki, Mendiratta, Sanjeev Kumar, Doshi, Maulik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10124690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37093266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-023-04530-x
_version_ 1785029891842899968
author Patel, Ankit
Bhatt, Niraj
Prakash, S. S.
Biswas, Ghanashyam
Nagarkar, Rajnish
Roy, Bodhisatta
Samal, Priyanka
Agrawal, Narendra
Meshram, Sushil
Kaushal, Ashish
Satheesh, C. T.
Wategaonkar, Ravikumar
Thiagarajan, Kasi Viswanathan
Jain, Kartikeya
Vijayaveeran, P.
Mukherjee , Kalyan
Singh, Kishore
Patil, Tushar
Jain, Amit
Dolai, Tuphan Kanti
Jain, Minish
Hingmire, Sachin
Gupta, Tara Chand
Lakshmaiah, K. C.
Rajamanickam, Deepan
Nemade, Bhushan
Goyal, Vikash
Mahato, Pinaki
Mendiratta, Sanjeev Kumar
Doshi, Maulik
author_facet Patel, Ankit
Bhatt, Niraj
Prakash, S. S.
Biswas, Ghanashyam
Nagarkar, Rajnish
Roy, Bodhisatta
Samal, Priyanka
Agrawal, Narendra
Meshram, Sushil
Kaushal, Ashish
Satheesh, C. T.
Wategaonkar, Ravikumar
Thiagarajan, Kasi Viswanathan
Jain, Kartikeya
Vijayaveeran, P.
Mukherjee , Kalyan
Singh, Kishore
Patil, Tushar
Jain, Amit
Dolai, Tuphan Kanti
Jain, Minish
Hingmire, Sachin
Gupta, Tara Chand
Lakshmaiah, K. C.
Rajamanickam, Deepan
Nemade, Bhushan
Goyal, Vikash
Mahato, Pinaki
Mendiratta, Sanjeev Kumar
Doshi, Maulik
author_sort Patel, Ankit
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Very few studies have demonstrated the rituximab biosimilarity in terms of efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in India. Therefore, we compared the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and immunogenicity of our biosimilar rituximab with the reference rituximab (Ristova, Roche products [India] Pvt. Ltd) in patients with DLBCL in India. METHODS: A phase 3, randomized, assessor-blind, parallel-group, two-arm study was conducted across 28 sites in India. A total of 153 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients were randomized to receive either biosimilar rituximab or reference rituximab. The study drugs were administered at a dose of 375 mg/m(2) by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks for six cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) at the end of Cycle 6. Secondary end points included: pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and safety assessment. RESULTS: The ORR at the end of Cycle 6 was 82.14% in the biosimilar rituximab and 85.71% in the reference rituximab group. The risk difference (90% CIs) was – 3.57 (– 14.80, 7.66). It met the non-inferiority margin of – 20%. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were comparable between the two treatment groups. The incidence rate of immunogenicity was very low and similar in both the treatment groups. The safety profile of both the treatments was comparable with no major difference in terms of nature, frequency and severity of TEAEs. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the biosimilarity between the biosimilar rituximab and the reference rituximab. Our biosimilar rituximab could add to the cost-effective treatment alternatives for patients with DLBCL in India. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00280-023-04530-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10124690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101246902023-04-25 Rituximab biosimilar for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a phase 3 randomized study in India Patel, Ankit Bhatt, Niraj Prakash, S. S. Biswas, Ghanashyam Nagarkar, Rajnish Roy, Bodhisatta Samal, Priyanka Agrawal, Narendra Meshram, Sushil Kaushal, Ashish Satheesh, C. T. Wategaonkar, Ravikumar Thiagarajan, Kasi Viswanathan Jain, Kartikeya Vijayaveeran, P. Mukherjee , Kalyan Singh, Kishore Patil, Tushar Jain, Amit Dolai, Tuphan Kanti Jain, Minish Hingmire, Sachin Gupta, Tara Chand Lakshmaiah, K. C. Rajamanickam, Deepan Nemade, Bhushan Goyal, Vikash Mahato, Pinaki Mendiratta, Sanjeev Kumar Doshi, Maulik Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Original Article PURPOSE: Very few studies have demonstrated the rituximab biosimilarity in terms of efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in India. Therefore, we compared the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and immunogenicity of our biosimilar rituximab with the reference rituximab (Ristova, Roche products [India] Pvt. Ltd) in patients with DLBCL in India. METHODS: A phase 3, randomized, assessor-blind, parallel-group, two-arm study was conducted across 28 sites in India. A total of 153 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients were randomized to receive either biosimilar rituximab or reference rituximab. The study drugs were administered at a dose of 375 mg/m(2) by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks for six cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) at the end of Cycle 6. Secondary end points included: pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and safety assessment. RESULTS: The ORR at the end of Cycle 6 was 82.14% in the biosimilar rituximab and 85.71% in the reference rituximab group. The risk difference (90% CIs) was – 3.57 (– 14.80, 7.66). It met the non-inferiority margin of – 20%. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were comparable between the two treatment groups. The incidence rate of immunogenicity was very low and similar in both the treatment groups. The safety profile of both the treatments was comparable with no major difference in terms of nature, frequency and severity of TEAEs. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the biosimilarity between the biosimilar rituximab and the reference rituximab. Our biosimilar rituximab could add to the cost-effective treatment alternatives for patients with DLBCL in India. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00280-023-04530-x. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-04-24 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10124690/ /pubmed/37093266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-023-04530-x Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Patel, Ankit
Bhatt, Niraj
Prakash, S. S.
Biswas, Ghanashyam
Nagarkar, Rajnish
Roy, Bodhisatta
Samal, Priyanka
Agrawal, Narendra
Meshram, Sushil
Kaushal, Ashish
Satheesh, C. T.
Wategaonkar, Ravikumar
Thiagarajan, Kasi Viswanathan
Jain, Kartikeya
Vijayaveeran, P.
Mukherjee , Kalyan
Singh, Kishore
Patil, Tushar
Jain, Amit
Dolai, Tuphan Kanti
Jain, Minish
Hingmire, Sachin
Gupta, Tara Chand
Lakshmaiah, K. C.
Rajamanickam, Deepan
Nemade, Bhushan
Goyal, Vikash
Mahato, Pinaki
Mendiratta, Sanjeev Kumar
Doshi, Maulik
Rituximab biosimilar for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a phase 3 randomized study in India
title Rituximab biosimilar for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a phase 3 randomized study in India
title_full Rituximab biosimilar for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a phase 3 randomized study in India
title_fullStr Rituximab biosimilar for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a phase 3 randomized study in India
title_full_unstemmed Rituximab biosimilar for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a phase 3 randomized study in India
title_short Rituximab biosimilar for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a phase 3 randomized study in India
title_sort rituximab biosimilar for the treatment of diffuse large b-cell lymphoma: a phase 3 randomized study in india
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10124690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37093266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-023-04530-x
work_keys_str_mv AT patelankit rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT bhattniraj rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT prakashss rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT biswasghanashyam rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT nagarkarrajnish rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT roybodhisatta rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT samalpriyanka rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT agrawalnarendra rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT meshramsushil rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT kaushalashish rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT satheeshct rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT wategaonkarravikumar rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT thiagarajankasiviswanathan rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT jainkartikeya rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT vijayaveeranp rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT mukherjeekalyan rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT singhkishore rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT patiltushar rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT jainamit rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT dolaituphankanti rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT jainminish rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT hingmiresachin rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT guptatarachand rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT lakshmaiahkc rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT rajamanickamdeepan rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT nemadebhushan rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT goyalvikash rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT mahatopinaki rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT mendirattasanjeevkumar rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia
AT doshimaulik rituximabbiosimilarforthetreatmentofdiffuselargebcelllymphomaaphase3randomizedstudyinindia