Cargando…
An Overview of Stakeholders, Methods, Topics, and Challenges in Participatory Approaches Used in the Development of Medical Devices: A Scoping Review
Background: There is a wide variety of participatory approaches to involve stakeholders in the development of medical devices, but there is no comprehensive overview of these approaches. We therefore studied what participatory approaches are used in the development of medical devices as well as the...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10125077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37579489 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6839 |
_version_ | 1785029959500169216 |
---|---|
author | Woudstra, Kas Reuzel, Rob Rovers, Maroeska Tummers, Marcia |
author_facet | Woudstra, Kas Reuzel, Rob Rovers, Maroeska Tummers, Marcia |
author_sort | Woudstra, Kas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: There is a wide variety of participatory approaches to involve stakeholders in the development of medical devices, but there is no comprehensive overview of these approaches. We therefore studied what participatory approaches are used in the development of medical devices as well as the most important characteristics and challenges of these approaches. Methods: We conducted a scoping review and searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for articles published between July 2014 and July 2019. Papers were included if they presented original research featuring any form of stakeholder participation in the development of medical devices. We used The Spectrum of Public Participation to categorise the approach of each paper. Subsequently, we described the characteristics of each approach: the stakeholders involved, data collection methods, and topics addressed. We also identified challenges of the approaches as reported by researchers. Results: 277 papers were included, which could be categorised into three levels of participation: collaboration, involvement, and consultation. Patients and healthcare professionals are frequently engaged in all approaches. The most often used methods are workshops in the collaboration approach papers, and interviews in the involvement and consultation approach papers. Topics addressed in all approaches are: the problem, device requirements, design choices, testing, and procedural aspects of involvement. Reported challenges entail issues related to sampling, analysis, social dynamics, feasibility, and the limited number of topics that can be addressed. Conclusion: Participatory approaches reported in literature can be categorised in three overarching approaches that have comparable methodological characteristics. This suggests that if researchers want to apply a participatory approach it is not necessary to adopt a pre-determined approach, such as ‘participatory action research’ (PAR). Instead, they can independently determine the degree of participation, stakeholders, methods, topics, and strategies to account for challenges, making sure the participatory approach fits their research question and context. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10125077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Kerman University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101250772023-04-25 An Overview of Stakeholders, Methods, Topics, and Challenges in Participatory Approaches Used in the Development of Medical Devices: A Scoping Review Woudstra, Kas Reuzel, Rob Rovers, Maroeska Tummers, Marcia Int J Health Policy Manag Scoping Review Background: There is a wide variety of participatory approaches to involve stakeholders in the development of medical devices, but there is no comprehensive overview of these approaches. We therefore studied what participatory approaches are used in the development of medical devices as well as the most important characteristics and challenges of these approaches. Methods: We conducted a scoping review and searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for articles published between July 2014 and July 2019. Papers were included if they presented original research featuring any form of stakeholder participation in the development of medical devices. We used The Spectrum of Public Participation to categorise the approach of each paper. Subsequently, we described the characteristics of each approach: the stakeholders involved, data collection methods, and topics addressed. We also identified challenges of the approaches as reported by researchers. Results: 277 papers were included, which could be categorised into three levels of participation: collaboration, involvement, and consultation. Patients and healthcare professionals are frequently engaged in all approaches. The most often used methods are workshops in the collaboration approach papers, and interviews in the involvement and consultation approach papers. Topics addressed in all approaches are: the problem, device requirements, design choices, testing, and procedural aspects of involvement. Reported challenges entail issues related to sampling, analysis, social dynamics, feasibility, and the limited number of topics that can be addressed. Conclusion: Participatory approaches reported in literature can be categorised in three overarching approaches that have comparable methodological characteristics. This suggests that if researchers want to apply a participatory approach it is not necessary to adopt a pre-determined approach, such as ‘participatory action research’ (PAR). Instead, they can independently determine the degree of participation, stakeholders, methods, topics, and strategies to account for challenges, making sure the participatory approach fits their research question and context. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2022-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10125077/ /pubmed/37579489 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6839 Text en © 2023 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Scoping Review Woudstra, Kas Reuzel, Rob Rovers, Maroeska Tummers, Marcia An Overview of Stakeholders, Methods, Topics, and Challenges in Participatory Approaches Used in the Development of Medical Devices: A Scoping Review |
title | An Overview of Stakeholders, Methods, Topics, and Challenges in Participatory Approaches Used in the Development of Medical Devices: A Scoping Review |
title_full | An Overview of Stakeholders, Methods, Topics, and Challenges in Participatory Approaches Used in the Development of Medical Devices: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | An Overview of Stakeholders, Methods, Topics, and Challenges in Participatory Approaches Used in the Development of Medical Devices: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | An Overview of Stakeholders, Methods, Topics, and Challenges in Participatory Approaches Used in the Development of Medical Devices: A Scoping Review |
title_short | An Overview of Stakeholders, Methods, Topics, and Challenges in Participatory Approaches Used in the Development of Medical Devices: A Scoping Review |
title_sort | overview of stakeholders, methods, topics, and challenges in participatory approaches used in the development of medical devices: a scoping review |
topic | Scoping Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10125077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37579489 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6839 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woudstrakas anoverviewofstakeholdersmethodstopicsandchallengesinparticipatoryapproachesusedinthedevelopmentofmedicaldevicesascopingreview AT reuzelrob anoverviewofstakeholdersmethodstopicsandchallengesinparticipatoryapproachesusedinthedevelopmentofmedicaldevicesascopingreview AT roversmaroeska anoverviewofstakeholdersmethodstopicsandchallengesinparticipatoryapproachesusedinthedevelopmentofmedicaldevicesascopingreview AT tummersmarcia anoverviewofstakeholdersmethodstopicsandchallengesinparticipatoryapproachesusedinthedevelopmentofmedicaldevicesascopingreview AT woudstrakas overviewofstakeholdersmethodstopicsandchallengesinparticipatoryapproachesusedinthedevelopmentofmedicaldevicesascopingreview AT reuzelrob overviewofstakeholdersmethodstopicsandchallengesinparticipatoryapproachesusedinthedevelopmentofmedicaldevicesascopingreview AT roversmaroeska overviewofstakeholdersmethodstopicsandchallengesinparticipatoryapproachesusedinthedevelopmentofmedicaldevicesascopingreview AT tummersmarcia overviewofstakeholdersmethodstopicsandchallengesinparticipatoryapproachesusedinthedevelopmentofmedicaldevicesascopingreview |