Cargando…

Policy by Pilot? Learning From Demonstration Projects for Integrated Care: Comment on "Integration or Fragmentation of Health Care? Examining Policies and Politics in a Belgian Case Study"

Analysis of policy implementation for chronic disease in Belgium highlights the difficulties of launching experiments for integrated care in a health system with fragmented governance. It also entreats us to consider the inherent challenges of piloting integrated care for chronic disease. Sociomedic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Gore, Radhika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10125225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35942955
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7152
_version_ 1785029989253513216
author Gore, Radhika
author_facet Gore, Radhika
author_sort Gore, Radhika
collection PubMed
description Analysis of policy implementation for chronic disease in Belgium highlights the difficulties of launching experiments for integrated care in a health system with fragmented governance. It also entreats us to consider the inherent challenges of piloting integrated care for chronic disease. Sociomedical characteristics of chronic disease –political, social, and economic aspects of improving outcomes – pose distinct problems for pilot projects, particularly because addressing health inequity requires collaboration across health and social sectors and a long-term, life-course perspective on health. Drawing on recent US experience with demonstration projects for health service delivery reform and on chronic disease research, I discuss constraints of and lessons from pilot projects. The policy learning from pilots lies beyond their technical evaluative yield. Pilot projects can evince political and social challenges to achieving integrated chronic disease care, and can illuminate overlooked perspectives, such as those of community-based organizations (CBOs), thereby potentially extending the terms of policy debate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10125225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101252252023-04-25 Policy by Pilot? Learning From Demonstration Projects for Integrated Care: Comment on "Integration or Fragmentation of Health Care? Examining Policies and Politics in a Belgian Case Study" Gore, Radhika Int J Health Policy Manag Commentary Analysis of policy implementation for chronic disease in Belgium highlights the difficulties of launching experiments for integrated care in a health system with fragmented governance. It also entreats us to consider the inherent challenges of piloting integrated care for chronic disease. Sociomedical characteristics of chronic disease –political, social, and economic aspects of improving outcomes – pose distinct problems for pilot projects, particularly because addressing health inequity requires collaboration across health and social sectors and a long-term, life-course perspective on health. Drawing on recent US experience with demonstration projects for health service delivery reform and on chronic disease research, I discuss constraints of and lessons from pilot projects. The policy learning from pilots lies beyond their technical evaluative yield. Pilot projects can evince political and social challenges to achieving integrated chronic disease care, and can illuminate overlooked perspectives, such as those of community-based organizations (CBOs), thereby potentially extending the terms of policy debate. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2022-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10125225/ /pubmed/35942955 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7152 Text en © 2023 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Gore, Radhika
Policy by Pilot? Learning From Demonstration Projects for Integrated Care: Comment on "Integration or Fragmentation of Health Care? Examining Policies and Politics in a Belgian Case Study"
title Policy by Pilot? Learning From Demonstration Projects for Integrated Care: Comment on "Integration or Fragmentation of Health Care? Examining Policies and Politics in a Belgian Case Study"
title_full Policy by Pilot? Learning From Demonstration Projects for Integrated Care: Comment on "Integration or Fragmentation of Health Care? Examining Policies and Politics in a Belgian Case Study"
title_fullStr Policy by Pilot? Learning From Demonstration Projects for Integrated Care: Comment on "Integration or Fragmentation of Health Care? Examining Policies and Politics in a Belgian Case Study"
title_full_unstemmed Policy by Pilot? Learning From Demonstration Projects for Integrated Care: Comment on "Integration or Fragmentation of Health Care? Examining Policies and Politics in a Belgian Case Study"
title_short Policy by Pilot? Learning From Demonstration Projects for Integrated Care: Comment on "Integration or Fragmentation of Health Care? Examining Policies and Politics in a Belgian Case Study"
title_sort policy by pilot? learning from demonstration projects for integrated care: comment on "integration or fragmentation of health care? examining policies and politics in a belgian case study"
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10125225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35942955
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7152
work_keys_str_mv AT goreradhika policybypilotlearningfromdemonstrationprojectsforintegratedcarecommentonintegrationorfragmentationofhealthcareexaminingpoliciesandpoliticsinabelgiancasestudy