Cargando…

Kosteneffektivität von Case und Care Management bei älteren Populationen in Deutschland: Eine systematische Literaturübersicht

Background Despite trends toward longer-lasting health, the complexity of older people’s health problems is increasing, raising the need for interprofessional care in all settings. A lack of coordination among providers risks fragmented care, leading to a repetition or gaps in services, conflicting...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brinkmann, Carolin, Radic, Marija, Kasprick, Lysann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10125341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36126951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1845-1054
Descripción
Sumario:Background Despite trends toward longer-lasting health, the complexity of older people’s health problems is increasing, raising the need for interprofessional care in all settings. A lack of coordination among providers risks fragmented care, leading to a repetition or gaps in services, conflicting treatment recommendations, medication errors and higher costs. Accordingly, new integrated models of care are needed that are based on patient needs. Case and Care Management (CCM) is currently being tested in Germany in a variety of settings to improve care. Aim of the study: The aim of the present study was to analyze the results of health economic evaluations of CCM interventions in Germany in populations over 60 years of age compared to standard care. Material and Methods The study is based on a systematic literature review conducted via Pubmed and Livivo and supplemented by a comprehensive hand search. The primary studies included for analysis were assessed using the CHEERS statement and narratively synthesized. Results A total of five cost-effectiveness studies were included, predominantly based on randomized controlled trials. Results regarding cost effectiveness were mixed. Individual studies found significant differences on effectiveness and cost endpoints. Conclusions The mixed, small number of studies does not currently provide a clear picture of whether CCM interventions have health economic advantages over standard care. Further research is indicated. Innovation fund projects on the topic area are expected to generate new evidence in the future.