Cargando…

Topical hemostatic agents in the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis

Background and study aims  Novel topical hemostatic agents have shown promising results in treating patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). However, data are limited even in published meta-analyses as to their role, especially compared to conventional endoscopic approach...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alali, Ali A., Moosavi, Sarvee, Martel, Myriam, Almadi, Majid, Barkun, Alan N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10125779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37102185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1984-6895
_version_ 1785030097578754048
author Alali, Ali A.
Moosavi, Sarvee
Martel, Myriam
Almadi, Majid
Barkun, Alan N.
author_facet Alali, Ali A.
Moosavi, Sarvee
Martel, Myriam
Almadi, Majid
Barkun, Alan N.
author_sort Alali, Ali A.
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Novel topical hemostatic agents have shown promising results in treating patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). However, data are limited even in published meta-analyses as to their role, especially compared to conventional endoscopic approaches. The aim of this study was to perform a highly comprehensive systematic review assessing the effectiveness of topical hemostatic agents in UGIB in different clinical settings. Methods  We performed a literature search of OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Knowledge databases through September 2021. Studies assessing the efficacy of topical hemostatic agents in UGIB were included. Main outcomes were immediate hemostasis and overall rebleeding. Results  A total of 980 citations were identified and 59 studies with a total of 3,417 patients were included in the analysis. Immediate hemostasis was achieved in 93 % (91 %; 94 %), with similar results according to etiology (NVUGIB vs. variceal), topical agent used, or treatment strategy (primary vs. rescue). The overall rebleeding rate was 18 % (15%; 21 %) with the majority of rebleeds occurring in the first 7 days. Among comparative studies, topical agents achieved immediate hemostasis more often than standard endoscopic modalities (OR 3.94 [1.73; 8.96), with non-different overall rebleeding odds (OR 1.06 [0.65; 1.74]). Adverse events occurred in 2 % (1 %; 3 %). Study quality was overall low to very low. Conclusions  Topical hemostatic agents are effective and safe in the management of UGIB with favorable outcomes when compared to conventional endoscopic modalities across a variety of bleeding etiologies. This is especially true in novel subgroup analyses that assessed immediate hemostasis and rebleeding among RCTs and in malignant bleeding. Due to methodological limitations of available data, additional studies are needed to ascertain their effectiveness more confidently in the management of patients with UGIB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10125779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101257792023-04-25 Topical hemostatic agents in the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis Alali, Ali A. Moosavi, Sarvee Martel, Myriam Almadi, Majid Barkun, Alan N. Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Novel topical hemostatic agents have shown promising results in treating patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). However, data are limited even in published meta-analyses as to their role, especially compared to conventional endoscopic approaches. The aim of this study was to perform a highly comprehensive systematic review assessing the effectiveness of topical hemostatic agents in UGIB in different clinical settings. Methods  We performed a literature search of OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Knowledge databases through September 2021. Studies assessing the efficacy of topical hemostatic agents in UGIB were included. Main outcomes were immediate hemostasis and overall rebleeding. Results  A total of 980 citations were identified and 59 studies with a total of 3,417 patients were included in the analysis. Immediate hemostasis was achieved in 93 % (91 %; 94 %), with similar results according to etiology (NVUGIB vs. variceal), topical agent used, or treatment strategy (primary vs. rescue). The overall rebleeding rate was 18 % (15%; 21 %) with the majority of rebleeds occurring in the first 7 days. Among comparative studies, topical agents achieved immediate hemostasis more often than standard endoscopic modalities (OR 3.94 [1.73; 8.96), with non-different overall rebleeding odds (OR 1.06 [0.65; 1.74]). Adverse events occurred in 2 % (1 %; 3 %). Study quality was overall low to very low. Conclusions  Topical hemostatic agents are effective and safe in the management of UGIB with favorable outcomes when compared to conventional endoscopic modalities across a variety of bleeding etiologies. This is especially true in novel subgroup analyses that assessed immediate hemostasis and rebleeding among RCTs and in malignant bleeding. Due to methodological limitations of available data, additional studies are needed to ascertain their effectiveness more confidently in the management of patients with UGIB. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10125779/ /pubmed/37102185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1984-6895 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Alali, Ali A.
Moosavi, Sarvee
Martel, Myriam
Almadi, Majid
Barkun, Alan N.
Topical hemostatic agents in the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis
title Topical hemostatic agents in the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis
title_full Topical hemostatic agents in the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Topical hemostatic agents in the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Topical hemostatic agents in the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis
title_short Topical hemostatic agents in the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis
title_sort topical hemostatic agents in the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10125779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37102185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1984-6895
work_keys_str_mv AT alalialia topicalhemostaticagentsinthemanagementofuppergastrointestinalbleedingametaanalysis
AT moosavisarvee topicalhemostaticagentsinthemanagementofuppergastrointestinalbleedingametaanalysis
AT martelmyriam topicalhemostaticagentsinthemanagementofuppergastrointestinalbleedingametaanalysis
AT almadimajid topicalhemostaticagentsinthemanagementofuppergastrointestinalbleedingametaanalysis
AT barkunalann topicalhemostaticagentsinthemanagementofuppergastrointestinalbleedingametaanalysis